Page 19 of 52
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:44 pm
by SleepyKrew
lol
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:28 pm
by Uphill
↑ kondi2424 wrote:I'm fine with a 1v1 with Uphill. Any takers?
But you're voting sleepy
↑ kondi2424 wrote:@implosion: Uphill isn't getting anywhere with his tunneling on Mattman and I instead of actually scumhunting, and apparently I'm a waste of a slot as well, so I think it would do good.
1) I did get somewhere with Mattman.
2) My votes on you and Mattman are "actually scumhunting", because you both can be scum, and the votes are culling information useful for determining whether or not this is indeed the case
3) How the fuck am I tunneling? I've been in this game not even 48 hours, and have voted three different people. That's like, anti-tunneling.
Wosstoo wrote:Also, Uphill is pissing me off.
Good.
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:59 pm
by kondi2424
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 3:17 pm
by Regfan
Weirdalexv replaces Kondi2424, everyone give him a warm welcome!
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 3:20 pm
by SodaSpirit17
oh hey it's that alex dude. lol sorry bout lynching you, but technically it was either that or nl to win.
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 6:31 pm
by Furcolow
unvote
for now
i will give the replacement a chance to make up for the terrible lurker
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 6:42 pm
by Furcolow
implosion's #414 attacks 2 people on the triangle wagon of being scum (highly unlikely 2/4 are scum for MS voting trends imo)
inb4 me using imo is a scumtell in his eyes (poking fun that his case on soda, to me, is town thought process)
also, if you look at his motivation in pushing soda (at 3 votes vs. triangle's 4) makes me happy to join the triangle wagon. feels like a weak chainsaw. implosion's scum game > implosion's town game. I wouldn't be surprised if he's scum here.
tl;dr implosion is mudslinging on the triangle wagon, while pushing the soda wagon
Mattman's omgus is voteworthy
vote: mattman
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 6:42 pm
by Furcolow
↑ implosion wrote:Also:
step one, read case.
step two, vote soda.
step three, ???
step four, profit.
botched south park quote
+scumpoints
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 6:43 pm
by Furcolow
↑ SodaSpirit17 wrote:ah holy crap. sorry about the lack of me. and i was prodded in a game so yea. kinda had to post before it was too late. im actually on benadryl right now so i might pass out randomly lol. anyways lemme catch up.
oh shit, maybe implosion is right LOL
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 6:44 pm
by Furcolow
↑ Mattman wrote:So reckoner, why do you think soda has been more scummy than triangle?
↑ xRECKONERx wrote: ↑ Mattman wrote:So reckoner, why do you think soda has been more scummy than triangle?
↑ SleepyKrew wrote:Reck is defscum. No way town Reck would vote a lurker after tunneling on triangle so hard.
are you two reading a different game where these magical things happened or something
LOL
LOL
LOL
hahaha
i cant
stop
laughing
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 8:49 pm
by Force of Nature
↑ Pine wrote:I want to say that 403 is too blatantly scummy to be scummy, but from what I've observed I am uncertain that Mattman is competent enough to be that clever. In other words, as much as I want to dissect the WIFOM of OMGUSing that badly, I don't know if it's possible.
pinescummeta wrote:Your unwillingness to do so is so anti-Town that I have a hard time seeing actual scum doing it, which forces me to conclude that you're probably just remarkably stubborn Town.
Pinescummeta and Pine townmeta aren't hugely different stylewise. Guess I'll have to look at specific stuff.
But that's for tomorrow.
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:18 pm
by Force of Nature
Last time Reck used that face picture he was scum.
It feels a little unlikely that all he'd say about me is he dislikes the fact that another head popped in for three posts.
What about my content?
And it's a little weird that he's dismissive of impressions based on tone (post 376).
I just think townreck would be putting a tiny bit more effort into pushing the lynch he wants / explaining why.
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 12:51 am
by wierdalexv
Hi, just dropping in. I'll have to read after school today, as I have to eat breakfast in a couple of minutes.
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 3:54 am
by Yates
I have nothing to add other than that my vote stands but I was prodded so I'm posting.
Also, sorry that you had to take over for someone that posted scummy, wierdalexv. You have an uphill climb right now.
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:02 am
by Pine
↑ Force of Nature wrote:Pinescummeta and Pine townmeta aren't hugely different stylewise. Guess I'll have to look at specific stuff.
But that's for tomorrow.
Thank you?
At least I think that's a compliment.
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 5:03 am
by xRECKONERx
↑ Force of Nature wrote:Last time Reck used that face picture he was scum.
It feels a little unlikely that all he'd say about me is he dislikes the fact that another head popped in for three posts.
What about my content?
And it's a little weird that he's dismissive of impressions based on tone (post 376).
I just think townreck would be putting a tiny bit more effort into pushing the lynch he wants / explaining why.
I've used this face picture a bunch of times, are you seriously trying to turn that into a scumtell?
And I'm p sure I've talked about your content already which is why you're on my scumlist
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 5:49 am
by Force of Nature
I don't care about the face picture, that was just amusing to me.
All you've said about me is that you didn't like head #2 popping in for a few posts and that you don't regard me as an upper tier player.
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:05 am
by xRECKONERx
Actually you're right, I haven't said anything.
I'm just generally uneasy about your slot due to the confusion from earlier but now that I'm looking at it closer, I see no reason for you to be the lynch for today. I don't like the fact you're sitting on the Soda wagon because like I said, Soda is a VI and a VI wagon just seems like one of those
it's easy, too easy
situations on D1.
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:57 am
by Pine
I disagree, Reck (about the Soda wagon). It was formed for excellent reasons, and I feel those reasons haven't gone away. Soda's been guilty of opportunistic voting, sheeping in a scummy way, bad reactions to having a wagon on him (major AtE when it happened), and generally lurking whenever people aren't paying attention to him.
There's a reason my vote hasn't moved off of him since page four. He's either scum or a liability, and nothing he's said makes me want to reconsider that opinion. Same applies to SleepyKrew - scum or liability. Either are good choices for a D1 lynch, and so is Triangle (though less on the "liability" angle, and more on the "likely to be scum" angle.)
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:00 am
by Force of Nature
Haha, I feel similarly about Reck voting Triangle for such a long time.
P.edit:
Pine keeps making me think he's scum.
My inner kittens are divided on him, which is a bit awkward.
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:02 am
by xRECKONERx
FUCKING FINE.
I'LL THROW MY VOTE DOWN ON THIS VI SHIT BUT WHEN YOU TURN OUT TO BE WRONG YOU FUCKING OWE ME A TRIANGLE LYNCH.
DEAL?
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:05 am
by Pine
↑ xRECKONERx wrote:FUCKING FINE.
I'LL THROW MY VOTE DOWN ON THIS VI SHIT BUT WHEN YOU TURN OUT TO BE WRONG YOU FUCKING OWE ME A TRIANGLE LYNCH.
DEAL?
I support this product and/or service.
You're adorable, FoN.
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:14 am
by xRECKONERx
I want a handshake from FoN too before this happens.
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:21 am
by Force of Nature
Actually I'm starting to want to vote Triangle myself.
Reck, who are Triangle's partners?
Right now I think Pine + ???
If you can fill in some possibilities for the ????s I'll feel better about this.
I don't really have enough non-town-reads if you're town, so something's broken.
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:21 am
by Force of Nature
UNVOTE: