Mafiascum.net

In post 447, TheIrishPope wrote:Bacde, I understand your confidence, and I'm pretty sure Ghostlin is scum, but why didn't you vote him when I was voting him?

I didn't notice when you were voting him

did you vote him before he made the vengeful comment and back when I thought you were scum?

that might explain it

TIP I need you to claim "vengeful" or "not vengeful" right now

Yeah way back when you were voting me; before the venge comment.
I am not a vengeful.

@TNE why did you unvote TheIrishPope when he said that "stuff would go down" when he reached L-1?

what did you think he was softing?

In post 448, Bacde wrote:

In post 441, TheIrishPope wrote:Vegito, when you flip scum (because you will be lynched), I expect an apology from you.
PEdit: That was L-1? Really? I thought only two of us were voting.

why would scum apologize for playing to their win condition?

Because it's just lipservice. He knows I'm not scum.

Ffery I think you're going to be sorely disappointed when you realize your meta tells on both myself and Nacho are worthless.

I could buy Vegito being scum

The nacho side looks good but Majiffy keep screwing it up

Vegito if you are actually town then move your vote to ghostlin NOW

I'm not voting a town read.

You should listen to nacho

Why is ghostlin a townread for you?

In post 453, Vegito wrote:Ffery I think you're going to be sorely disappointed when you realize your meta tells on both myself and Nacho are worthless.

The Nacho tell is not precisely a scum tell, which is why I want to talk with him some more.

p-edit. and...post 456 has a townish feel to it.

In post 347, Vegito wrote: 1) Ghostlin is town for posts 215/216. Like really obvtown. As in scum doesn't make those kinds of posts.

Maybe you should consider reading my posts.

In post 459, fferyllt wrote:p-edit. and...post 456 has a townish feel to it.

You don't say.

Maybe you should consider that I don't have all the posts in this game memorized

Why would a scum who is trying to get town-TIP lynched not make posts 215/216?

In post 462, Bacde wrote:Maybe you should consider that I don't have all the posts in this game memorized

One would think that a player who is trying to get a scumread lynched would read what an active replacement has been saying about why said scumread is town. Particularly since said active player has had to restate it now.

In post 463, Bacde wrote:Why would a scum who is trying to get town-TIP lynched not make posts 215/216?

The tone is all wrong.

One would think that if you are this confident about Ghostlin being town then you would have no problem repeating why. Particularly since if you need to repeat yourself so much then maybe it wasn't a good argument in the first place?

I'm certain you've never made a post with a tone like that as scum? I just feel like if I was scum and TIP was town, I'd probably vote TIP for the "right to remain silent" post and use the same reasoning and tone that Ghostlin did.

In post 465, Bacde wrote:One would think that if you are this confident about Ghostlin being town then you would have no problem repeating why.

One would think that players in a game would have a bit of motivation looking into things if they're town.

In post 465, Bacde wrote:Particularly since if you need to repeat yourself so much then maybe it wasn't a good argument in the first place?

That doesn't follow.

In post 465, Bacde wrote:I'm certain you've never made a post with a tone like that as scum?

Me too? Why is this a question? Are we just using the wrong punctuation now?

In post 465, Bacde wrote:I just feel like if I was scum and TIP was town, I'd probably vote TIP for the "right to remain silent" post and use the same reasoning and tone that Ghostlin did.

Cool hypothetical with no real grounding in reality, bro.

Its interesting to me that you are more motivated to try to tear my post apart rather than try to understand it.

I understand it completely. I understand that instead of dealing with the fact that I have a townread and you won't be changing that, you're instead trying to destroy my town reads. Where's the pro-town motivation in destroying the town reads of other townies? Thought so.

Are you seriously asking me what my motivation is for trying to understand why you have a townread on my top scumread?

Where in "you should have no problem repeating yourself" and "maybe it wasn't such a good argument in the first place" is you 'trying to understand' my town read? Because it really doesn't look like 'trying to understand' at all.

I mean the only direct responses to the reasons I gave for why Ghostlin is town has been "well i'm certain you've never done that as scum?" (posturing, also worthless), and "If I was in his position I would do exactly that as scum" which is also worthless.

To extend beyond that, neither of those statements show any intent to attempt to understand, and show full intent in saying "your read is wrong stop townreading that person stop it".

I don't understand why you are so insecure about me raising objections to your townread that now you have to somehow turn this into a me-being-scum-motivated scenario

I figured if you actually townread ghostlin that you'd have good reasoning beyond my objections

Me saying that Ghostlin is doing things I would have done if I were scum is not worthless, actually

whole lotta no u going on itt.

I'm not insecure about my read. It's a big warning sign when someone tries to dismantle a town read with baseless arguments.

I gave good reasoning. Your "objections" are 'nuh uh' and 'i'd do that'.

I don't know your alignment. How am I supposed to take your word when you're pushing the person I have a town read on, and your argument against said town read is 'nope!'?