Mafiascum.net

In the meanwhile, how about you ask questions like a true townie...

Okay. Why do you all take the easy route rather than pursue other scum? Even if I WAS scum, you'd only have one, and there would be 3 others.

You do realise I have Bert as a scum read too lol.

In post 452, Fegelein wrote:You do realise I have Bert as a scum read too lol.

2/4. Still missing two.

I'll get more reads within due time, thank you very much.

I already posted the final scum team...

Cool

Also my scum team is:

TIP, Fegelein, notscience and me.

Though to be honest thats just whose posted on this page.

In other words, your reads are shit and just because you have a lot of them doesn't mean anything.

This is coming from a guy with 6 posts.

Although I have a gut town read on you.

Also you have provided no content at all again and you should be shot.

Also, I have a creeping feeling that ArcAngel could be lurking scum. She's usually much more active as Town, but could be a case of IRL's.

We're probably shooting TIP today.

If that's not a joke/reaction test, then I'd reconsider on TIP tbh. He plays like this as Town too.

Then again, I haven't seen his scum games.

In post 424, notscience wrote:
Town would look up background information to get to know who they are playing against better, their playstyles, habits, etc. He obviously hasn't. Think of it this way. Town look up that background info to get stronger reads on someone, and it helps scumhunt. Scum don't need to look it up, as all they have to do is take the easy roads. Laziness is in no way a town tell, I'd agree to maybe null but I find it more scummy IMO. If you want to know if someones behaviour is indicative of scum, look up their past games.

i don't do meta. reading the game i'm in is hard enough. i find meta pretty unreliable. i certainly use it in the sense of "hey i have played with this person before and have a sense of their style" or "this person has played with me before and they know my style" but as far as reading past games i have never done it. if i don't know you and you don't know me, then we get to know each other. if you want to read my past games, go ahead, but i don't care that much. lazy, yes. scum, no.

In post 451, notscience wrote:Okay. Why do you all take the easy route rather than pursue other scum? Even if I WAS scum, you'd only have one, and there would be 3 others.

who are your partners?

Oil: not TIP. maybe feg. i did like your "pick a name out of a hat idea." here's a list-

ArcAngel9
Kerberos
borkjerfkin
fegelein

BTW, why do you think me and the other 3 are scum? You've barely expanded on it.

Why am I out of your list again and feg back in?

ArcAngel9
Kerberos
borkjerfkin
fegelein
wisdom

*fixed

Thanks for avoiding my question.

i think its pretty obvious.

it seems everyone wants to push notscience and jacob. the two easiest targets out there. might they be scum? sure. but i don't see any evidence in that direction.

Jacob comes across as an easy target to me, but notscience is beyond scummy at this point.

I might have to ISO myself to remember the list.

Do you see any evidence in any other direction, don?

Prod dodge .. Not sure where the other two heads went in terms of posting, but I'm still on LA til tommorow.

Ill catch up Friday at the latest.

Wisdom wrote:Do you see any evidence in any other direction, don?

not at the moment.

Then why do you scumread whoever scumreads the only leads we have?

Why do you not have me on your list of scumspects, yet ask me who my "partners" are?

That's actually a decent point by science.

OK, Don's getting put in the scum pile, screw the weak Town read from the reaction test.