Mafiascum.net

In post 444, BBmolla wrote:

In post 428, Rail Tracer wrote:because fuck you, stop ignoring me, bbmolla

?

What am I ignoring?

In post 399, Rail Tracer wrote:HEY BBMOLLA,

I KNOW YOU'RE READING MY POSTS, SO STOP AVOIDING 219

In post 447, ooba wrote:Out of game, but what's with the Saki hate?

People are just dicks.

In post 451, Viera Assassin wrote:

In post 447, ooba wrote:Out of game, but what's with the Saki hate?

People are just dicks.

or maybe everyone just hates your playstyle but you aren't doing anything at all this game so you'll be dying soon.

In post 219, Rail Tracer wrote:i'm still not seeing how you think i'm town for the vote on you.

i think the second part of mnemonic's first post looked townish. why is it scummy?

and why did sk's claim make you think scum? i assumed you had some other reason, given you citing his "posting" as the reason when i asked about it earlier... (see 56)[/quote]

In post 218, BBmolla wrote:Cause you are town and the people calling you scum are silly. Your vote just made it final.

^It's just your postings. You aren't scared of shit. You're scumhunting. etc.

In post 116, mnemonicdevice wrote:VOTE: dopog

This isn't random. He is by far the most scummy person so far.

This is townish?

I could vote you and say the same thing and not have any reasoning. It's just a hidden random vote.


In regards to claim, last like 3/4 miller claims have been by scum. His first page posts were all dreadful contributing to my doubt in him being town. Recent shit is all town as hell.

In post 452, theloveofneroandmollie wrote:

In post 451, Viera Assassin wrote:

In post 447, ooba wrote:Out of game, but what's with the Saki hate?

People are just dicks.

or maybe everyone just hates your playstyle but you aren't doing anything at all this game so you'll be dying soon.

I don't plan on doing anything because the discussion so far has been mediocre
and the playerlist isnt doing anything to help my apathy

Lamento que usted rodó escoria.

REGARDING SAKI:

There are two types of townies- those that actually help the town to win and those who . Saki is the latter.

N could bring back and replace Saki with him and I'd be cool with that.

I'd take the original shotty, if that's easier to pull off.

In post 454, Viera Assassin wrote:

In post 452, theloveofneroandmollie wrote:

In post 451, Viera Assassin wrote:

In post 447, ooba wrote:Out of game, but what's with the Saki hate?

People are just dicks.

or maybe everyone just hates your playstyle but you aren't doing anything at all this game so you'll be dying soon.

I don't plan on doing anything because the discussion so far has been mediocre
and the playerlist isnt doing anything to help my apathy

N, when are you checking in

what are you talking about I am awsum

also N is probably still asleep but he should be around tonight.

eta: hi andy!

Hey mollie! I'll be back later- going to see my doctor.

To be fair, I'm posting more than Mollie but Saki complaining about the lack of "good" town discussion while not adding to the discussion and claiming that the "lack of discussion prevents him from adding to the game is especially derptastic.

+

he's not voting confirmed Kat scum.

In post 460, theloveofneroandmollie wrote:not adding to the discussion

adding to the discussion = taking part in the discussion
why would i do the latter if i hate the discussion?

In post 461, Viera Assassin wrote:

In post 460, theloveofneroandmollie wrote:not adding to the discussion

adding to the discussion = taking part in the discussion
why would i do the latter if i hate the discussion?

what do you not like about the discussion?

tbh it is slightly less dumb than most of the discussions I have seen/participated in on this site.

this head isn't as sure about kats being scum as I was 5 minutes ago (I am a sucker for aTe) but the only other person who is tweaking my scumdar is rail tracer and I don't want to go after them cos I love that hydra. also if they are pinging it probably means they are town but hard to say.

so following the nero head on his read.

well dopog is still pinging, oobi not so much anymore

In post 462, theloveofneroandmollie wrote:what do you not like about the discussion?

players.
bunch of meta
bunch of disoriented people pointing fingers at each other flailing randomly
buddying that doesn't involve me
my inability to keep up with it given school

derps calling me out for lurking/not doing anything when there's actual lurkers actively lurking in-thread
bunch of reasons

Well, if you have a town wincon then I don't understand why you don't help in finding scum ergo I'm having a hard time believing that you have a town wincon.

Hi. Ermmm sorry finding it hard to get back into the game after busyness. Think I may just post some of what I had down before;

@Rail; My responses in quotes;

In post 144, Rail Tracer wrote: you think pushing a wagon

keeps rvs going

? in what world? and why do you think my fluff posting was me trying to "look helpful" when that clearly isn't the case at all.

dopog wrote:Would it be more helpful if I said I equate eearly fluff posting/empty votes with rvs and look helpful = early activity?

if your thinking is that i was trying to get SK lynched, why do you think i would admit i don't even find him scummy, and that i'm not voting him for any good reason? and why do you think i unvoted? surely if my plan were a lynch on SK the easier method for achieving this is to pretend i find something scummy about him, no?

dopog wrote:Read the next sentence in that post : S Like I said; obv you weren't going to get him lynched off of that but I think that the push s indicative of the mindset. That is; pushing lynches on players you know are not scum/not your scumteam

i do think SK could be town. i was gut reading him as town from his first post. and i am genuinely surprised that there are people who think he's scum.

dopog wrote:Ok this is hard to discern. But then his first post was before you voted him woo....

you're not correctly analysing it because you have this silly idea that my play makes sense as scum but you haven't really explained how it does.

If you cherrypick stuff out of an argument maybe it doesn't make sense yeah ok....
I mean why push a wagon on someone you think is town? Serious or not it doesn't matter. There are almost ZERO circumstances I can conceive it as coming from town... And if you say reaction fishing Idek I'd be pretty heated at that haha because your votes didn't seem to be dictated by it (except maybe the one on BBmolla)...

So basically; "Knowing" people are town from beginning of the game => scummy. Wanting to push lynches on people you know (or think) are town (whether or not they happen (cause rvs, bussing, compromise, any number of reasons, etc.) => scummy
So yeah your play does make sense as scum...


Burning question;
@BBmolla; what are your reads on ooba, DeasVail and myself?

~~~~

This is more recent stuff;

@Shadowy Prison; I don't know how I can respond to a vote on you where the only stated reason presupposes someone else as scum. Not liking a no response after a vote in that context means either that's some confirmation bias on something wrong in the first place or I dunno really....

mnemonicdevice has provided nothing of substance and yeah trying to look outside the omgus he is pretty scummy still I reckon

My read on Kats is super null - strong stances but then yeah being rather abrasive and crap
If I have time I'll check the meta just wondering if it is actually scum motivated.

byebye

In post 465, theloveofneroandmollie wrote:Well, if you have a town wincon then I don't understand why you don't help in finding scum ergo I'm having a hard time believing that you have a town wincon.

I find scum differently than normal on this account.
I'll lurk through the first 500 posts or so and analyze later.
Sadly I don't have anything that's finished to prove that.

If I'm getting people who're replacing out because of that then I might as well get out.
Better that N has to find one replacement in the place of two or possibly more

In post 439, theloveofneroandmollie wrote:

In post 434, DeasVail wrote:Andy, at the moment I get the feeling that your Katsuki read is an attempt to go against the trend rather than actually being genuine. And before someone asks, this is quite independent of Katsuki's alignment.

Well the confidence in his Katsuki townread doesn't match all that well with his reasoning, given the high level of suspicion against Katsuki. I can think of town reasons for this (else I'd be tunneling them), but I can think of scum reasons too.

In post 466, dopog wrote:@BBmolla; what are your reads on ooba, DeasVail and myself?

All bleh.

In post 466, dopog wrote:mnemonicdevice has provided nothing of substance

and yeah trying to look outside the omgus he is pretty scummy still I reckon

People who write like this cause my brain to explode. Also. What town would say "and yeah trying to look outside of the omgus he is pretty scummy"

This guy has gotta go.

@DV: Or my post could read like this: THANKS for noticing. Why didn't you mention any of the other 5 people? Except in a sarcastic tone of voice.

VOTE: dopog

Saki might have to go soon too.

I'm already going.