Mafiascum.net

I seriously don't think a Cheery wagon is more likely than a Zebe one or an Aptil one.

Actually, what does everyone think of:
- Zebe
- Aptil
- Cheery

In post 397, BBmolla wrote:Zebe

randomly

saying one of top 4 posters is scum and then voting one is scummy as shit.

Which you see as the scummy part:
1. Me calling someone scum.
2. Accused being one of the top posters.
3. My vote "afterwards".

Also, the . Why so?

In post 392, BBmolla wrote: Uh

why?

349, 358, 362.

In post 394, Does Bo Know wrote:^^^^THIS guy knows what's up.

In post 384, Does Bo Know wrote: ^^This guy gets it.

In post 387, Does Bo Know wrote:Zebe. Opportunistic vote, inventing more reasons to vote me

than needed

to try justifying his vote.

Alright. Really, did you get your scumread on me only because of 349? It sounds like your only argument supporting ScumZebe is that my case is not reasonable. What would be a good case then? With not "too much" reasoning?

@Kalimar: Ok, you're showing up now. I had no idea when you'd come back, and DBK desperately needed my vote. I'm a impatient person. I want to see you trying to get reads on the higher volume posters.

Shouldn't KBW slot already be replaced? That annoys me.

There's a difference between finding new evidence that others have missed

And trying harder to find more "scumtells" to make your vote sound more justified.

I believe it's the second one.

By "than needed" I mean that I can understand why I'm under scrutiny for "buddying" ETL, but some of the other stuff just doesn't compute, and considering the timing on my wagon plus your crap reasons, I feel like you were taking advantage of the situation.

Ugh, 384 and 394 are just floating there in my last post.

In post 450, Does Bo Know wrote:I seriously don't think a Cheery wagon is more likely than a Zebe one or an Aptil one.

Actually, what does everyone think of:
- Zebe
- Aptil
- Cheery

Are these your scumreads? What did happen to Wake read from 387?
I feel you're just buddying. You got quickly convinced about Cheery and Aptil scumreads (Although Cheery getting my scumdar to alert too).

You are scum and need to die.

I want an Aptil wagon because the content thus far has been subpar. I don't have much of a scum read on Aptil yet.

I want to hear what everyone thinks about Cheery because I can't tell whether he's scummy or is just dumb.

I do think Wake is about as scummy as Aptil, but the difference between his tunneling and your "case" on me is that his might be confirmation bias. Maybe he'll snap out of it. But the longer he doesn't, the more suspicious I become of him.

Order of scum reads that you were curious about:
- Zebe
- Wake
- Aptil/Cheery

However most everyone had already given thoughts on Wake, so I felt it would be superfluous to ask again.

In post 452, Does Bo Know wrote:There's a difference between finding new evidence that others have missed

And trying harder to find more "scumtells" to make your vote sound more justified.

I believe it's the second one.

By "than needed" I mean that I can understand why I'm under scrutiny for "buddying" ETL, but some of the other stuff just doesn't compute, and considering the timing on my wagon plus your crap reasons, I feel like you were taking advantage of the situation.

What I've been saying all along is that I can't find any indication of you wanting a read from Wake while demanding conclusions and whatnot. And of course the ETL sheeping stuff, which I shouldn't even have to mention anymore.

This is what I see, call it crap all you want. Does someone else want to comment my case?

Can you rephrase the "What I've been saying" sentence because I don't understand it.

In post 401, Mr_Blonde wrote: 1st quote: You list Gam and Kalimar as your scum reads because you don't see a reason for their votes besides wagoning? Why is that necessarily scummy?

2nd quote: You list Gam as scummier than Kalimar because he has more posts, but you keep your vote on Kalimar.

1: Not necessarily scummy, but it's the only apparent reason I saw.
2: Yes. There was already voting pressure from ETL and DBK, I think it was necessary to form a wagon. I was still forming my basic reads at that time.

@DBK: Gah. "You are scum and need to die."
I did't see that you really wanted to get a Wake read. However, you still vote him and demand conclusions from him.

I apologize that my wording can be unclear at times. My English can get floppy when I'm tired.

I was voting him to pressure conclusions out of him, mainly.

I for one am humored by his attempts to dismiss my pressure on him. His latest spin is calling it tunneling.

Hopefully tomorrow I'll have more time to apply extra pressure.

Me: "Hey Wake, you're tunneling and I'm explaining why your scumtells against me aren't really scumtells."

You: "Lol tunneling, lemme tunnel you more later tho."

In post 451, Zebe wrote:Which you see as the scummy part:
1. Me calling someone scum.
2. Accused being one of the top posters.
3. My vote "afterwards".

Also, the bolded part. Why so?

Because it came at a time when the tide started heading towards DBK and seemed pretty un-natural.

Plus he's pretty fucking town, so for you to have him a scumread suddenly is wierd.

In post 450, Does Bo Know wrote:I seriously don't think a Cheery wagon is more likely than a Zebe one or an Aptil one.

Actually, what does everyone think of:
- Zebe
- Aptil
- Cheery

All solid votes.

Hmm just realized something. Looking over Cherry's ISO I saw that lucky dice-rolled Aptil. That explains his reaction on it somewhat. Still hypocritical from a content/gameplay level but it makes more sense at least.

Anyway UNVOTE:

VOTE: Cherry

Checking in here, I'm a bit behind.

In post 448, Mr_Blonde wrote:His stance on you regarding BB's gambit. I seriously don't see how he came to that conclusion when reading the same posts.

And why does that make me a good wagoning choice?

Don't you mean why does that make you a good lynching choice

Because those are totally the same thing

I mean that's what you told me so

In post 60, Cheery Dog wrote:

In post 37, Does Bo Know wrote:Anorway said a Night 0 cop is possible.

Just waiting on Wake.

Since when does night 0 even exist.

Would like to see the mod post if this is the case publicly in thread

Until then
UNVOTE:
VOTE: does bo know

In post 435, Cheery Dog wrote:21 - wanting to assume that anyone creating something outside the norm is scum faking. Even of it was a conspiracy thought.

Also the revelation of the mod's answer about night 0 actions.

---

Wagon => lynch.

Looking at your ISO these seem to be the posts that give you the scum read on DBK. Can you explain your thoughts here a little more?

busy busy busy.

Since DBK has been spurned by ETL he has actually got down to saying his own thing. so ok, liking it more, but still not overly convinced

UNVOTE:

In post 454, Does Bo Know wrote:I want to hear what everyone thinks about Cheery because I can't tell whether he's scummy or is just dumb.

I really cant say, his posts have been challenging and the content is not overly questionable in my opinion, so I don't fully understand the reason for the wagon that is starting to form.

but I was curious that Zebe welcomes input form Kal but opts to ignore Aptil?

Uhm, I'll catch up after Christmas guys.