In post 449, Elscouta wrote:Many scumtells are also done as town. Mafia would be a sad game otherwise That "scum can do it easier" is good enough for me in a day1 wagon (and much better than VT claiming / being useless, which is done indistinctively by town and scum). Also I think you downplay the tell a bit. "Reading someone has town, then giving a reason that could not be the reason for the read in a very short timeframe" is a bit more that "not paying attention to the game".
Memory errors like that are common in humans.
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 7:15 am
by Shadoweh
Oh okay, then you're just sheeping Tierce and I'm dumb, thanks for pointing that out. ._.
In post 416, SpyreX wrote:However chamber reading Els's games and noticing a different in style of posting and then probing to see why feels waay more town motivated then scum mostly because, even if he did find something, scum-chamber trying to push a lynch through on HE TYPE DIFFERENT would be the most uphill and eye pulling kind of thing ever.
Is this assuming from chamber's posting, or did you follow up on the claimed work and look at Elscouta's games and notice a different posting style yourself?
In post 442, Shadoweh wrote:I got the impression it was made up to be annoying in the first place, but I agree that it was pretty terrible. That's better reasoning then I expected actually. And it's easy to forget about people when they aren't posting. :V
Why is it better than expected when he almost literally c/p'd Tierce's reasons?
Albert: Still waiting on that Dan explanation.
ActionDan or sirdanilot?
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 7:57 am
by Natirasha
In post 430, Tierce wrote:There's three votes on you, Natirasha. Why even talk about claiming?
Tongue->Cheek
In other news, Aegor's vote is actively bad and a good place to find scum.
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 8:03 am
by Desperado
[quote="In post 454, PeregrineV"]ActionDan or sirdanilot?[/quote
Sirdanilot. He promised an explanation on Reck or Sirdan but not both. I want him to deliver.
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 8:30 am
by Plum
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 8:42 am
by Desperado
Unvote
Vote: Natirasha
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 8:44 am
by Natirasha
Hey Desp, what's up?
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 8:46 am
by Desperado
You aren't doing shit.
And you keep reaching out to SSK even though he's been consistently suspicious of you all game and hasn't responded to them.
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 8:48 am
by Natirasha
Do I ever do shit, Desperado?
And what does SSK have to do with me? All it does is prove he can't actually read me.
And what does SSK have to do with me? All it does is prove he can't actually read me.
1. Yes, you do.
2. You aren't even acknowledging him batting your hand away. It looks like scum avoiding something and hoping it just goes away. Why is SSK town?
What fucking measure do you guys actually measure 'doing something' by? Because, guess what, let's look at one such person who is currently complaining about me "doing nothing", shos. Go look at his ISO? You know what he's done? FUCKING NOTHING. He's berated people for using a public neighborhood thingy and sat there complaining about me. That's been the approximation of his interactions for the last like 15 pages. This is despite me being arguably BETTER and MORE USEFUL here than in our last game together, where I literally said "I'm just going to lurk until LyLo". Then did exactly that.
If you're expecting long-form responses from me, ha ha ha ha, well tough shit. If you're expecting content? Read. I'm giving it. Do I joke around? Sure, absolutely, but that's not all there is. I've pretty clearly outlined my stances. If you don't like my face? Either avoid playing with me, suck it up, or WotC me out of the game. Don't sit there and complain about me playing -as I always play-.
Follow it up with a thousand other people on the outskirts just quietly chiming in saying "hey Nat's not doing anything" should make you think something's off about this push on me.
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 9:54 am
by TheIrishPope
"You're calling me out for something? Look at this other guy!"
Guys, typical scum play right here
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 9:56 am
by Natirasha
In post 462, Desperado wrote:2. You aren't even acknowledging him batting your hand away. It looks like scum avoiding something and hoping it just goes away. Why is SSK town?
In post 462, Desperado wrote:2. You aren't even acknowledging him batting your hand away. It looks like scum avoiding something and hoping it just goes away. Why is SSK town?
You just said that all it proves is that SSK can't read you worth shit. Which means he's town, right?
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:43 am
by Natirasha
No? It just means he can't read me worth shit.
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:52 am
by chamber
Now that red whine is over, I can say that natirasha's play here doesn't look at all like his play there to me.
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:05 pm
by JacobSavage
In post 409, PeregrineV wrote:Do you speculate they are in a town-town, town-scum, or other type of neighborhood?
Honestly currently I'd go with town-town, CES is halfway between null and chamber for me personally.
In post 449, Elscouta wrote:"Reading someone has town, then giving a reason that could not be the reason for the read in a very short timeframe"
Why would it have to be a short time-frame?
Chamber what was different there and here?
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 8:11 pm
by Shadoweh
In post 470, chamber wrote:Now that red whine is over, I can say that natirasha's play here doesn't look at all like his play there to me.
What was Nat in red whine?
Today I learned Nat can bite. I would WotC you back in. When I say I want things to be done I just mean to at least try and present something that's meant to be read and understood by other people. Most people seem to be very bad at posting things like that. I thought your big post was p good though.