Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:13 am
Why not?In post 449, BBmolla wrote:I don't think Majiffy is scum
Why not?In post 449, BBmolla wrote:I don't think Majiffy is scum
So helpful.In post 441, Svenskt Stål wrote:i have restated what i dont understand and dont like about your vote in the thread, read itIn post 439, vezokpiraka wrote:I don't care what other people say. I said thatIn post 437, Svenskt Stål wrote:people keep saying thatdon't understand your reasoning. Please explain in such a way that I would understand.I
In post 446, Majiffy wrote:Waiting for the whole game to be restored before I finish catching up.
lol, you can be townIn post 447, AngryPidgeon wrote:^ AH HA, THE TRIED AND TRUE
PHONEPOSTING
WORK
LURKER
SITE-CRASH SCUMTELL.
SCUM DETECTED.
You do realize I was making fun of DGB.In post 448, Majiffy wrote:AP you ever tried pulling your head out of your ass?
Do tell?In post 454, Svenskt Stål wrote:excuses are scummy
Just go ahead and re-read this quote a few times, then smack your head against your desk for being a derp.
I haven't excused myself from anything.In post 458, Svenskt Stål wrote:scum feels like they have to, town dont
i get overloaded at work for 2 days, i dont excuse myself
majiffy is, repeatedly
She's not the one with backward reads.In post 463, Majiffy wrote:Oh and Mastin is a fucking scumbutt for completely ass-backward reads.
Stuff it up yer bumhole. Molla and I will solve this game together without anyone else's help goddamnit.In post 466, Bulbazak wrote:She's not the one with backward reads.In post 463, Majiffy wrote:Oh and Mastin is a fucking scumbutt for completely ass-backward reads.
Gut. I mean I haven't looked into that much admittedly.
I thinkIn post 410, AngryPidgeon wrote:Attempting to meta mastin will get you nowhere when mastin is arguable the person MOST aware of their own meta on the entire site.
In post 419, Svenskt Stål wrote:cases are not soley to make others vote with you, they are a tool for which others can read you better, so saying that you dont like making cases because no one follows them is bad logic.
Sven's case on Vezok is bad, sure, I'll give you that. But how is the case scummy? Much less 'as hell' on top of it?In post 426, AngryPidgeon wrote:Bulbs post is good. Svens case on Vezok is scummy as hell.
How do scum lie about a reason and then forget it?In post 428, Svenskt Stål wrote:like how do you forget WHY you vote someone?
In post 446, Majiffy wrote:Waiting for the whole game to be restored before I finish catching up.
I am basically opposite with you on both of these. I'm fascinated you're reading it that way. majiffy is sidelining himself, and Sven reads frustrated townie to me - what are you getting?
In post 452, Svenskt Stål wrote:In post 446, Majiffy wrote:Waiting for the whole game to be restored before I finish catching up.lol, you can be townIn post 447, AngryPidgeon wrote:^ AH HA, THE TRIED AND TRUE
PHONEPOSTING
WORK
LURKER
SITE-CRASH SCUMTELL.
SCUM DETECTED.
Indeed, I see my vote's vanished.In post 386, Svenskt Stål wrote:#magicIn post 381, Zdenek wrote:Did you even explain your read on Vezok?
step to me
That's why it's an awesome wagon.In post 393, Svenskt Stål wrote:it is a lazy wagon because i had done nothing up to that point