Mini 410 - McDonald's Mafia [Game Over!]


Forum rules
User avatar
StallingChamp
StallingChamp
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
StallingChamp
Goon
Goon
Posts: 531
Joined: September 29, 2006

Post Post #450 (ISO) » Sun Mar 25, 2007 4:33 am

Post by StallingChamp »

Your failure you answer my question a posed 2 posts ago is noted.
Show
[color=red][b][i]GO SENS GO[/b][/i][/color]

[url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5295]Mini 441[/url] - Night 2

High School Mafia coming soon to a Mini Theme Queue near you!
User avatar
Amb
Amb
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Amb
Goon
Goon
Posts: 273
Joined: January 22, 2007

Post Post #451 (ISO) » Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:57 pm

Post by Amb »

Unvote Now a ranger


My vote was cast in annoyance over a trivial irrelevant to the game issue. (See gender tags and compare to the 'Her' references)
User avatar
DeanWinchester
DeanWinchester
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
DeanWinchester
Goon
Goon
Posts: 410
Joined: January 11, 2007

Post Post #452 (ISO) » Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:33 pm

Post by DeanWinchester »

StallingChamp wrote:Your failure you answer my question a posed 2 posts ago is noted.


Is that at yellow bounder or me?
User avatar
pete d
pete d
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
pete d
Goon
Goon
Posts: 489
Joined: September 24, 2006
Location: 123 Fake Street

Post Post #453 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 12:15 am

Post by pete d »

NAR wrote: Pete D: seems like he doesn't know what he's talking about and accuses people without stating a good reason why. calls everyone scummy, although he is in fact acting very scummy (1). He also pressures a lot of people for no apparent reason. I have no idea why he voted on me. He said he voted on me for reasons previously mentioned.... and he didn't even state any reasons (2). Dragon voted on Pete to make him close to lynch, but maybe that was to rid Pete of suspicion later (3)?
1) i do not call everyone scummy. the people who i have called scummy so far are: SC early on day 1 (I;ll admit that I wasn;t thinking very well or paying enough attention on day 1, and i apologise), DW on day 1 and 2, Amb on day 2 (
unfos
btw) and NAR / zarvok on day 2.

2)
pete d (2 separate posts) wrote:I'll put a vote: Zarvok for now, he defended DoS yesterday and tried to keep pressure on me (as did DoS); also threw some Fos's around.

the fact that we are now most likely looking for scumbuddies changes things somewhat. I'm thinking of a Zarvok/Dean pair, for several reasons. Zarvok for interactions with DoS yesterday; Dean for attacking my reasons for voting Zarvok earlier; asking PP for a claim, but then not waiting and going lynch -1; fishing for SC to full claim when there was no reason too; general role-fishing whilst remaining opposed to mass claiming.
3) what a load. DoS pushed for my lynch all day, as did your predecessor.

NaR's whole analysis strikes me as complete garbage. however, I will
unvote
to consider the PP / DW issue.
User avatar
Pink Princess
Pink Princess
Bloodthirsty Babe
User avatar
User avatar
Pink Princess
Bloodthirsty Babe
Bloodthirsty Babe
Posts: 694
Joined: February 14, 2006

Post Post #454 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:36 am

Post by Pink Princess »

Apologies for my weekend absence. Busy girl.

Replacing NaR sound like a great idea, his last post gave me the impression he didn't even read the game.

I read through the wagon and didn't catch any new brilliant insights. I think there's not a lot of content to work with when it comes to yellowbounder or Zarvok/NaR.

Amb's participation levels/thoughts and input seemed to have dropped - Amb, what's up?

That's all, it's early.
User avatar
Machiavellian-Mafia
Machiavellian-Mafia
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Machiavellian-Mafia
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2076
Joined: April 11, 2006
Location: Florence, Italy

Post Post #455 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 2:32 am

Post by Machiavellian-Mafia »

yellowbounder are you suspicious of anyone else at the moment besides NAR?
The end justifies the means.
User avatar
yellowbounder
yellowbounder
/cows
User avatar
User avatar
yellowbounder
/cows
/cows
Posts: 846
Joined: May 18, 2006
Location: International

Post Post #456 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:18 am

Post by yellowbounder »

In Day 1 there was a niggling suspicion about Amb, since I was slightly suspicious of why a Doc would claim on Day 1. I'm not sure about anyone at the moment no.

And StallingChamp, I can find no definitive point where you talked about DoS, you mentioned it before and after my post.

And
Vote: StallingChamp
. Last time I checked, not bothering to read through the thread was bad form, if nothing else. So, my vote visits you.
User avatar
DeanWinchester
DeanWinchester
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
DeanWinchester
Goon
Goon
Posts: 410
Joined: January 11, 2007

Post Post #457 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:09 am

Post by DeanWinchester »

I think we need a vote count to see where every thing Is at right now.
Also I think its time to seriosly DISCUSS a mass-claim.
We have four poeple that havn't claimed. Should we press them to claim?
I think we might as well, considering where we are at.

I also would still like to here back from glork on whether or not he thinks it's possible there is a paranoid/naive cop and a real cop.
User avatar
Glork
Glork
Burdened by Proficiency
User avatar
User avatar
Glork
Burdened by Proficiency
Burdened by Proficiency
Posts: 14106
Joined: July 13, 2005
Location: Dance into the fire

Post Post #458 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:19 am

Post by Glork »

Uh, yellowbounder, pay attention. StallingChamp is pretty much the most confirmed player around, as he's the one who busted DoS's false claim on Day One.
Green Shirt Thursdays


Get to know a Glork!
User avatar
StallingChamp
StallingChamp
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
StallingChamp
Goon
Goon
Posts: 531
Joined: September 29, 2006

Post Post #459 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:24 am

Post by StallingChamp »

yellowbounder wrote:And StallingChamp, I can find no definitive point where you talked about DoS, you mentioned it before and after my post.

And
Vote: StallingChamp
. Last time I checked, not bothering to read through the thread was bad form, if nothing else. So, my vote visits you.
I think it would be pretty obvious I meant when I busted DoS's claim.

Also, call it OMGUS if you want, but I will
Vote: Yellowbounder
. That post alone pretty much makes me sure you are scum. First of all, I never said I didn't, or wouldn't reread the thread. Turns out I have reread it all several times (some of which I already proved in-thread), I just didn't have time at THAT EXACT TIME. Besides, seems you didn't reread either, since you weren't clear what I meant by commenting on DoS when I flat-out busted him. Also, in all modesty, I'm pretty sure that I am the most confirmed player, and I have reason to believe that it was either Glork or I targetted last night, Glork for his scum-catching skills, me for pretty much proving my innocent.

Also, just a shout out to everyone in general, from how I busted DoS, and with some of the responses, I do consider myself pretty confirmed. If this is wrong, please correct me so that I will stop saying that :P .
Show
[color=red][b][i]GO SENS GO[/b][/i][/color]

[url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5295]Mini 441[/url] - Night 2

High School Mafia coming soon to a Mini Theme Queue near you!
User avatar
DeanWinchester
DeanWinchester
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
DeanWinchester
Goon
Goon
Posts: 410
Joined: January 11, 2007

Post Post #460 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:26 am

Post by DeanWinchester »

I just totally got ignored by glork.
I guesse the Paragon of mafia hunters is just to cool for me.
User avatar
StallingChamp
StallingChamp
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
StallingChamp
Goon
Goon
Posts: 531
Joined: September 29, 2006

Post Post #461 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:28 am

Post by StallingChamp »

EBWODP: Ok, just saw Glork's post, and that confirms my thoughts in the last sentence.
Show
[color=red][b][i]GO SENS GO[/b][/i][/color]

[url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5295]Mini 441[/url] - Night 2

High School Mafia coming soon to a Mini Theme Queue near you!
User avatar
Glork
Glork
Burdened by Proficiency
User avatar
User avatar
Glork
Burdened by Proficiency
Burdened by Proficiency
Posts: 14106
Joined: July 13, 2005
Location: Dance into the fire

Post Post #462 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:29 am

Post by Glork »

Sorry, DW, I'm in something of a hurry, and I was just skimming over things really quickly -- I missed your question.

At this time, I do not think that there would be a sane/paranoid cop in addition to a regular one. Adding a second and (more importantly) a *useless* cop is overall a detriment to the town. And with probably 3 scumbags and 1 neutral player already, the town doesn't need the pain of dealing with multiple cops of questionable sanity. I really do think that PP is the play of the day. And I don't think we need anybody else to claim. There's a lot of info to go out there and grab, if only we can come to a consensus on what to actually *do*.
Green Shirt Thursdays


Get to know a Glork!
User avatar
StallingChamp
StallingChamp
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
StallingChamp
Goon
Goon
Posts: 531
Joined: September 29, 2006

Post Post #463 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:33 am

Post by StallingChamp »

I'd still rather not move my vote off of YB, but meh.
Show
[color=red][b][i]GO SENS GO[/b][/i][/color]

[url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5295]Mini 441[/url] - Night 2

High School Mafia coming soon to a Mini Theme Queue near you!
User avatar
Glork
Glork
Burdened by Proficiency
User avatar
User avatar
Glork
Burdened by Proficiency
Burdened by Proficiency
Posts: 14106
Joined: July 13, 2005
Location: Dance into the fire

Post Post #464 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 11:59 am

Post by Glork »

...and YB is probably the other person I'd be willing to swing vote at this point. *shrug*
Green Shirt Thursdays


Get to know a Glork!
User avatar
Machiavellian-Mafia
Machiavellian-Mafia
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Machiavellian-Mafia
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2076
Joined: April 11, 2006
Location: Florence, Italy

Post Post #465 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:49 pm

Post by Machiavellian-Mafia »

I prefer lynching YB over PP at this point since YB is scummy and has not claimed while we can let PP prove her claim.
The end justifies the means.
User avatar
The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
The Central Scrutinizer
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3100
Joined: August 18, 2006
Location: Illinois

Post Post #466 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 2:01 pm

Post by The Central Scrutinizer »

Machiavellian-Mafia wrote:I prefer lynching YB over PP at this point since YB is scummy and has not claimed while we can let PP prove her claim.
I agree with this, sort of. I still think Zarvok/NAR were more suspicious.
"You might very well think that; I couldn't
possibly
comment."
User avatar
StallingChamp
StallingChamp
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
StallingChamp
Goon
Goon
Posts: 531
Joined: September 29, 2006

Post Post #467 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 2:11 pm

Post by StallingChamp »

Pretty sure NAR is just a really bad player.
Show
[color=red][b][i]GO SENS GO[/b][/i][/color]

[url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5295]Mini 441[/url] - Night 2

High School Mafia coming soon to a Mini Theme Queue near you!
User avatar
Amb
Amb
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Amb
Goon
Goon
Posts: 273
Joined: January 22, 2007

Post Post #468 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:36 pm

Post by Amb »

If you are wondering about participation - I have been on holiday - and away from my PC. Coming in in dribs and drabs. To be honest, im struggling a tad as well to be motivated when my death is up soon (be it by overnight kill or lynch)
User avatar
pete d
pete d
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
pete d
Goon
Goon
Posts: 489
Joined: September 24, 2006
Location: 123 Fake Street

Post Post #469 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:13 pm

Post by pete d »

SC wrote:Pretty sure NAR is just a really bad player.
but then you've still got Zarvok's interactions with DoS on Day 1.

@MM: how can PP prove her claim? if she is scum, she'll just make up a result and pretend to be naive or paranoid or whatever.
User avatar
Machiavellian-Mafia
Machiavellian-Mafia
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Machiavellian-Mafia
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2076
Joined: April 11, 2006
Location: Florence, Italy

Post Post #470 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 11:34 pm

Post by Machiavellian-Mafia »

pete d wrote:@MM: how can PP prove her claim? if she is scum, she'll just make up a result and pretend to be naive or paranoid or whatever.
e.g. she gets guilty result and the person gets lynched and turns out scum.

If she continues to give suspicious results we can evaluate her at that later point. My main point about PP is that she should get a chance to prove herself when her claim has legit flavor and the counterclaimer didn't even say she's scum.
The end justifies the means.
User avatar
Glork
Glork
Burdened by Proficiency
User avatar
User avatar
Glork
Burdened by Proficiency
Burdened by Proficiency
Posts: 14106
Joined: July 13, 2005
Location: Dance into the fire

Post Post #471 (ISO) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:20 am

Post by Glork »

What the counterclaimer thinks has nothing to do with it. If Dean is telling the truth, his opinion is no better or worse than anybody else's. I don't see why you're insistent on putting so much weight on "but the counterclaimer says there could be two!" The
only
thing that says to me is "if PP *does* turn up scum, DW is definitely scum, and he's trying to pre-emptively explain himself." Still, everything I'm seeing points to PP being scum right now.
Green Shirt Thursdays


Get to know a Glork!
User avatar
yellowbounder
yellowbounder
/cows
User avatar
User avatar
yellowbounder
/cows
/cows
Posts: 846
Joined: May 18, 2006
Location: International

Post Post #472 (ISO) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:20 am

Post by yellowbounder »

Amb wrote:If you are wondering about participation - I have been on holiday - and away from my PC. Coming in in dribs and drabs. To be honest, im struggling a tad as well to be motivated when my death is up soon (be it by overnight kill or lynch)
Cheer up, it's not all that bad.
Glork wrote:What the counterclaimer thinks has nothing to do with it. If Dean is telling the truth, his opinion is no better or worse than anybody else's. I don't see why you're insistent on putting so much weight on "but the counterclaimer says there could be two!" The only thing that says to me is "if PP *does* turn up scum, DW is definitely scum, and he's trying to pre-emptively explain himself." Still, everything I'm seeing points to PP being scum right now.
Can you tell me why you find PP so scummy, enough to make you to vote a claimed cop?
User avatar
Amb
Amb
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Amb
Goon
Goon
Posts: 273
Joined: January 22, 2007

Post Post #473 (ISO) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:50 am

Post by Amb »

No the holiday in the sun by a lake and several volcanoes was actually pretty good. I want to go back already
User avatar
Glork
Glork
Burdened by Proficiency
User avatar
User avatar
Glork
Burdened by Proficiency
Burdened by Proficiency
Posts: 14106
Joined: July 13, 2005
Location: Dance into the fire

Post Post #474 (ISO) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:59 am

Post by Glork »

yellowbounder wrote:Can you tell me why you find PP so scummy, enough to make you to vote a claimed cop?
I have already done so, and I've even elaborated on that explanation. Go figure it out for yourself. :roll:
Green Shirt Thursdays


Get to know a Glork!
Locked