Look at the last time he posted compared to that random pop-in.
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 7:13 am
by Spiffeh
I mean I know why I don't like it but I want to see if your reasons are similar.
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 7:15 am
by 3dicerolling
↑Spiffeh wrote:I mean I know why I don't like it but I want to see if your reasons are similar.
Well the fact that he posted shows he was following the thread, but I thought he was going to add something (like a response to you), so I'm pretty sure he was active-lurking.
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 7:20 am
by Spiffeh
Yeah that's exactly what I was thinking.
Clearly itlepip is paying attention closely enough to see that my post wasn't meant for here but he can't answer my question or contribute elsewhere?
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 7:23 am
by Spiffeh
CB's chansaw defense of itlepip is looking worse and worse imo especially since he completely dropped his dialogue with me.
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 7:26 am
by Spiffeh
Also yay 3dice is town!
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 7:42 am
by Spiffeh
Seriously @CB/Gork head do you see how itlepip tried to avoid interacting with me by shoehorning your "semantics argument'" shit?
How is that not scummy af?
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 7:49 am
by 3dicerolling
↑Spiffeh wrote:CB's chansaw defense of itlepip is looking worse and worse imo especially since he completely dropped his dialogue with me.
I'll look at it closer. I can't really get a good read on CB.
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 7:56 am
by itlepip
↑Spiffeh wrote:Yeah that's exactly what I was thinking.
Clearly itlepip is paying attention closely enough to see that my post wasn't meant for here but he can't answer my question or contribute elsewhere?
I don't really have an opinion on the whole Anti thing, I personally think that sort of stuff is NAI and even if it is it kinda spoils the game for me so I choose to ignore it. Past that not much has happened aside from a weird semantics argument between Gilgamesh and Notty that I think Gil won but I doubt matters. I have read the last few pages, but I just don't have anything to add and as I learned in another game saying things when you don't have strong opinions of the matter is pretty bad.
Also I did answer your question, in the post before you asked the question. The reason I left that argument is because you were asking the exact same questions over and over and your problems with my responses were minor semantics. If you feel there is anything that is actually a significant scumtell, please post it.
Here is post 261 so you can actually read it and find your answer.
↑itlepip wrote:You just said that my reaction was what caused you to be comfortable with your wagon, so I linked my reaction.
But you asked if that's why I started the wagon. That is not why I started the wagon.
↑itlepip wrote:Really a joke post 3 pages into the game was your scum read?
Yeah. Would you like to point me to something else scummy in those three pages that I didn't address?
First let's not be asinine with each other. Scum reading a joke post that isn't about the game should only ever be a meta read, which I am sure you don't have on me and certainly isn't evidence of scum.
Second
↑Maxous wrote:idk spiffeh, that seems overly aggressive for a weak reason
@CP: not really, no.
This could easily and was pushed.
Honestly going back to the question of why you started the wagon was probably this post. You posted 3-4 times after my joke post without mentioning and then after CB said this you jumped on the wagon and went back to try to find a passable attack.
All of that is fine that early in the game, but 11 pages in having a hard scum read based on a joke is ridiculous. I don't think that my joke post was actually what you think was the scummiest thing this game, so I think you are trying to go back and make excuses and are slipping up.
PEdit:Because it objectively was a semantics argument. I was talking about why you started my wagon and all you did is talk about the difference between why you started the wagon and the evidence that you got for the wagon a few posts later. When you are giving politician answers to my questions instead of actually addressing them, I generally will just move on and drop a vote on you instead of trying to get you to actually answer the question.
Either you think that you were pushing me due to my response to your wagon, which doesn't make sense because you have to have the wagon before I respond to it or the whole wagon was based on that joke post which you admitted was an incredibly weak reason for pushing my wagon. Either way it doesn't hold up and you going on like you had some highground in the argument is making me scumread you.
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 10:36 am
by MarioManiac4
Ack. I don't know why but I can't seem to get any reads :/
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 10:49 am
by CharlotteBebe
@spiff.
you really cant contextually understand why i didnt come back to whatever it was that you were taking issue with wrt itle?
are you being serious with that point?
because it really should be pretty obvious.
and if you were reading anything happening in this game you would know.
>:/
i co-opt arguments that people make that i like/agree with when im town and scum.
so.
i really dont get how youre finding that scummy at all.
i'll try to read into whatever it is youre trying to push about itle from earlier sometime soon, but if youre going to call me scum for procrastinating on something that isnt resonating with me then dont bother reaching out to me about anything because im just going to follow my own reads if you are gonna jump down my throat for bullshit reasons like "not following through with promising something" because thats fucking annoying.
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 10:51 am
by CharlotteBebe
also.
how in heavens name am i chainsaw defending itle?
what?
do you understand what the word chainsaw means?
or are you saying im chainsawing him by saying you look scummier than him in your 1v1? because i still do generally feel like the vibe from those back and forths was town itle and scum spiff. and im also pretty sure im not the only one who expressed that.
this game is frustrating.
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 10:54 am
by CharlotteBebe
like seriously, how are you even trying to hardpush someone as scum for using a word that i used to describe the back-and-forth between the two of you?
that doesnt make any sense.
at all.
Because he's scumreading me while simultaneously not actually reading my posts and passing off a read as gut.
He's not actually reading my posts as I've referred to myself as a knight several times and his post referred to me as a king, which, if you were reading someone's posts closely enough to get a bearing on their alignment and especially if you were trying to divine associative tells from their posting, missing a detail that persisted through the ISO is pretty fucking sketchy.
eh
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 2:31 am
by Cold Pizza
VOTE: itlepip
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 2:32 am
by Cold Pizza
↑CharlotteBebe wrote:like seriously, how are you even trying to hardpush someone as scum for using a word that i used to describe the back-and-forth between the two of you?
that doesnt make any sense.
at all.
Vote itlepip with me.
We can always ask vig to off notsci.
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 4:11 am
by Antihero
19 pages and still......... ZERO townreads... mollie's entrance LOOKS like interested townmollie but i found a way to fuck that up. suzune and itle have that red herring scent, and my only scumread is still shoving easy things on soft targets and keeping a low profile
BUT HE'S SOOPER DOOPER TOWN because he's got notty's fist in his mouth.
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 4:54 am
by Cold Pizza
You can have me as a townread lol
If anything CB is probably my strongest townread here with a really really big gap between my second one.