I don't like sheeping aquaman sheeping titus in butchering my username.
Dafuq? You haven't got my username right once yet...
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 10:48 am
by Aquanim
↑LoHa wrote:Meanwhile I'll take home the fact that aquaman doesn't know why Titus' vote is on me either and that I'm in his lynch pool because my play is thin. Does my postcount or the substance bother you? I've made two alignment indicative arguments for titusscum, the produce of my thin play. You call me scummy because my play is thin, I'd expect a townie with such a fat play as yours to come up with better arguments to base a lynch on, or at least sheep the ones that make sense.
Are you talkative scum?
You've talked a big game here. Now impress me or die. Give me your reads.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 10:52 am
by Aquanim
In the meantime, everyone should explain their votes for LoHa. There's one vote based on LoHa misremembering who said something (Soren), one vote based on an argument that's already been shot down in flames (Titus), one blatant self-preservation vote (itlepip), and three with no explanation at all (TheLhix, Pisskop, Yakko). Whichever of you are townies should be ashamed of yourselves.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 10:54 am
by itlepip
↑Aquanim wrote:In the meantime, everyone should explain their votes for LoHa. There's one vote based on LoHa misremembering who said something (Soren), one vote based on an argument that's already been shot down in flames (Titus), one blatant self-preservation vote (itlepip), and three with no explanation at all (TheLhix, Pisskop, Yakko). Whichever of you are townies should be ashamed of yourselves.
I'm not.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 10:56 am
by Titus
↑Aquanim wrote:In the meantime, everyone should explain their votes for LoHa. There's one vote based on LoHa misremembering who said something (Soren), one vote based on an argument that's already been shot down in flames (Titus), one blatant self-preservation vote (itlepip), and three with no explanation at all (TheLhix, Pisskop, Yakko). Whichever of you are townies should be ashamed of yourselves.
My arguments have been discredited not shot down.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 11:00 am
by TheLhix
↑Aquanim wrote:In the meantime, everyone should explain their votes for LoHa. There's one vote based on LoHa misremembering who said something (Soren), one vote based on an argument that's already been shot down in flames (Titus), one blatant self-preservation vote (itlepip), and three with no explanation at all (TheLhix, Pisskop, Yakko). Whichever of you are townies should be ashamed of yourselves.
I believe I already stated that my original vote was because of an agreement with Titus. Now, it is a mixture of believing that outburts of LoHa as well as suffering from apparent Alzheimer's makes a decent case. Also, I feel that these make decent excuses for the wagon against him and will not detract from it.
