Page 19 of 91

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 3:41 am
by JarJarDrinks
In post 449, MathBlade wrote:Off to work I go.
When can we expect you to "cut through the bullshit"?

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 5:29 am
by Donempire
In post 393, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 391, Gamma Emerald wrote: Whatever. That's your opinion.

Looks like whiteknighting
lol
In post 395, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 392, Donempire wrote:i said that so i could copy paste your readslist and say i disagree woth all of them. party crasher.
Sounds like a BS excuse.
to you it might but that was my intention.
In post 396, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 393, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 391, Gamma Emerald wrote: Whatever. That's your opinion.

Looks like whiteknighting
Whiteknighting who?
lol2
In post 408, MathBlade wrote:
In post 355, Zachstralkita wrote:LMFAOOOOOO pagetop jacked
Dunnstral wrote:
In post 333, Zachstralkita wrote:I don't take a whole lot of issue with Something_Smart at all, actually.
This is a scummy post by Zach by the way

Willing to believe Mathblade is incompetant for now

VOTE: Zachstral
Of course it is, I love you buddy but your inability to think sometimes upsets me











.........................but I'm the one who's really stupid
Wanted to get out some quick thoughts since work is going to be til late tonight.

I think the scum team is Zach dunn and something smart.

I don't like how Zach is pulling names from thin air and not supporting his reads. The only thing close to a reason is the psychology bit and while scientifically accurate does nothing to demonstrate whether those impulses are logical.

Furthermore if Zach was calling himself stupid and actually meant it then he would spend time asking questions and investigating people to get more signals into his brain to evaluate. Zach seems only interested in mudslinging.

Combining this with Dunn's sudden switch that looks like cross talk when I wouldn't be mislynched. Combined with how Dunn said I wouldn't be run up this gave Zach a place to camp while not doing anything useful.

Something smart when I played with them was pretty antitown. I don't like how they are wording their interactions with jar jar. They seem way more protown than when I played with them. I like it but it is very much off to how I know something smart to be.
until something smart ur reads are decent enough but if ur reading someone scummy for helping town and only that its dumb. meta isnt a good thing when it comes to mafia, at least not above gameplay right now. i hinder the town, fuck with everyone in my town games but i doubt anyone would scumread me for actually helping town, cos unless i have a deathwish or made a batshit plan to bus each of my teammates i wouldnt be helping town as scum. so yeah.
In post 430, iraonavp wrote:It seems like Infinity-234 is town-aligned.

Dongempire, what does your signature mean?
nothing
In post 447, MathBlade wrote:You all will see what I see. And I will cut through the bullshit.
put that to the act wanker

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 6:47 am
by inspectorscout
In post 451, Donempire wrote:wanker
In post 1, inspectorscout wrote:
No personal attacks will be tolerated.
Let's not.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 7:21 am
by Donempire
kay boss

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 8:09 am
by Zachstralkita
In post 434, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 408, MathBlade wrote:I think the scum team is Zach dunn and something smart.
In post 410, Dunnstral wrote:Well games over I guess

Congrats to mathblade naming the entire scum team on page 17
In post 411, Zachstralkita wrote:fuck sake bruv i told u we could have got out of it
Very much dislike this last post from Zach.

I feel like he's trying to inception the idea into Dunn that since math is wrong about him, he's wrong about Zach too.
You're thinking too hard.

In post 447, MathBlade wrote:You all will see what I see. And I will cut through the bullshit.

Better saw yourself in half then pal

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 8:23 am
by Dunnstral
In post 436, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 435, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 414, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 409, Zachstralkita wrote:I can tell you with certainty you're wrong on one of three of those, and that one is me
So you are saying S_S is scum, as Math is right about him and Dunn?
And also don't like this post either as it's misrepping what Zach is saying.
Kinda the point of the post there buddy.
lol?
The point of your post was to misrep what zach typed?

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 8:24 am
by Dunnstral
In post 450, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 449, MathBlade wrote:Off to work I go.
When can we expect you to "cut through the bullshit"?
from the dead thread probably

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 8:24 am
by Dunnstral
In post 454, Zachstralkita wrote:Better saw yourself in half then pal
HAHAHAHAHAHA

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 8:50 am
by Zachstralkita
if im not mistaken Math that amazing confidence you possess, which is actually arrogance, shined brilliantly in Wake's Role Madness where you embarrassed yourself with your reads in regard to myself and Dunnstral's hydra. So did Shaziro.

If anyone cares to know, Dunn said something random offhandedly and those two geniuses turned it into a "mafia crumb" because it was a song lyric. And Dunn said the word blue.

I thought they were joking, but no no no it was a serious read. Which made it even more of a joke to me. But that was the fruit of your genuine detective work.

Yet you're not fazed at all. Really love the tenacity, but it just seems like such a waste. Like you post that, go to work all day, then come back home and still think the same thing? You spent your recreational time formulating bullshit? I'm just telling you in advance, you're going to be sort of disappointed. What is the end result? Because you're not gonna get me lynched. Even if you did, I would flip green. And I think your reads on Dunn and S_S are ludicrous anyway.

Please please please divert your precious precious energy elsewhere, maybe someplace it will be useful. Go wild. Give us some percent equations maybe. Then solve them while we find scum and stuff. I'm telling you, it's gonna be great.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:09 am
by MathBlade
The fact you bothered to look up my prior games means you ar scared.

You are going through the stages of grief that you have to actually play and scumhunt now:

1) Denial someone could read you for vote parking me since RVS.
2) Anger then expressed itself when serious
3) Now you are bargaining with me to try to ask me to shut up while not scumhunting.
4) Awaiting depression then acceptance.

So if I am the VI you claimed you wouldn't be bothered to look up my prior games.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:13 am
by Zachstralkita
Bruh I WAS IN THE FUCKING PRIOR GAME

VALHALLA WAS MINE AND DUNNSTRALS HYDRA

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:18 am
by Zachstralkita
VOTE: Zachstralkita


1) I hold your hand just to help you out
2) You try to lynch one of (me, Dunnstral, Something_Smart)
3) I don't get lynched because I'm the most obvious townie present in this game
4) You have to seek another route or potentially NK me
5) Not before the Day 1 wagon switches to you

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:19 am
by Dunnstral
VOTE: Zachstralkita

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:22 am
by Gamma Emerald
What the hell?

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:23 am
by Zachstralkita
I have faith in Step 3.

Satan take the wheel.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:28 am
by Creature
VOTE: Zachstralkita

Oh good, another scum pulling a gambit.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:30 am
by Zachstralkita
Creature wrote:VOTE: Zachstralkita

Oh good, another scum pulling a gambit.
You just went full MathBlade

you never go full MathBlade

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:34 am
by Transcend
Z is a mislynch

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:35 am
by Transcend
In post 465, Creature wrote:VOTE: Zachstralkita

Oh good, another scum pulling a gambit.
This is a very bad post

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:47 am
by inspectorscout
Vote Count 1.12


JarJarDrinks- [0]
Dunnstral - [1] Mathblade
Zachstralkita - [3] Zachstralkita, Dunnstral, Creature
Creature - [1] Infinity 324
Infinity 324 - [0]
Transcend - [2] AlpacaAlpaca, iraonavp
XnadrojX - [0]
iraonavp - [0]
Mathblade - [0]
AlpacaAlpaca - [1] Transcend
Gamma Emerald - [0]
Dongempire - [0]
Something_Smart - [1] JarJarDrinks


Not Voting - Dongempire, Something_Smart, XnadrojX, Gamma Emerald

Mod Notes – If you're too lazy to get me a pagetop, you'll have to so it with this!

With 13 Alive, It Takes 7 to Lynch.

Day 1 Ends In (expired on 2016-10-26 14:14:38).

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:53 am
by Donempire
In post 458, Zachstralkita wrote:if im not mistaken Math that amazing confidence you possess, which is actually arrogance, shined brilliantly in Wake's Role Madness where you embarrassed yourself with your reads in regard to myself and Dunnstral's hydra. So did Shaziro.

If anyone cares to know, Dunn said something random offhandedly and those two geniuses turned it into a "mafia crumb" because it was a song lyric. And Dunn said the word blue.

I thought they were joking, but no no no it was a serious read. Which made it even more of a joke to me. But that was the fruit of your genuine detective work.

Yet you're not fazed at all. Really love the tenacity, but it just seems like such a waste. Like you post that, go to work all day, then come back home and still think the same thing? You spent your recreational time formulating bullshit? I'm just telling you in advance, you're going to be sort of disappointed. What is the end result? Because you're not gonna get me lynched. Even if you did, I would flip green. And I think your reads on Dunn and S_S are ludicrous anyway.

Please please please divert your precious precious energy elsewhere, maybe someplace it will be useful. Go wild. Give us some percent equations maybe. Then solve them while we find scum and stuff. I'm telling you, it's gonna be great.
let the guy do his thing if he has fun in it. even better for us if he makes good points. also, "kill me im green" cliche continues like anyones gonna claim red.
In post 467, Transcend wrote:Z is a mislynch
why
In post 468, Transcend wrote:
In post 465, Creature wrote:VOTE: Zachstralkita

Oh good, another scum pulling a gambit.
This is a very bad post
why2.0
In post 462, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Zachstralkita
will you ever be usefull

yeah fuck it if we get a speedlynch thatd be fun
VOTE: zach

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:55 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 470, Donempire wrote: yeah fuck it if we get a speedlynch thatd be fun
VOTE: zach
Why do you want the day to end early? Wanna talk with your buddies?

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:57 am
by Zachstralkita
well thats not happening. i intend to retract my vote. i would never lynch town anyway

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:59 am
by Donempire
In post 471, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 470, Donempire wrote: yeah fuck it if we get a speedlynch thatd be fun
VOTE: zach
Why do you want the day to end early? Wanna talk with your buddies?
surprised you took it at face value. yes i do want to talk with my buddies, im going to go out with one of them tomorrow, whats your point
In post 472, Zachstralkita wrote:well thats not happening. i intend to retract my vote. i would never lynch town anyway
k

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2016 10:00 am
by Zachstralkita
My fellows, you must consider looking at the bigger picture.