Mafiascum.net

Is there anyone who doesn't want to have a buddy?

VOTE: profii

Lost all my quotes .. weird I remember auto logout taking longer.

Nancy that reaction was super weird. Why are you getting this upset? Why are you trying to guilt people into townreading you? And I think it was directed at gamma where you basically said you either think I'm town or you're scum or something somewhat threatening like that
Unwarranted and does make me feel you're trying to play to your alleged town meta more than it's just a natural response.

RCE - what did wisdom say that changed your mind?

And what's with all the BoP on wisdom.. I remember him being more of a late game player. He posts lots of jokes and one word posts and naked reads/votes without explanation in d1. Wisdom am I misremembering?


Creature is in this game? Wut ..just noticed. Hi creature what do you think of wisdom this game? Gamma? RR?
Anybody else you want to talk about..


Amz can you state a reason or reasons for your vote?

Whoever voted cheeky is on to something. I'd expect more posts by now.

Pedit - no I get paranoid by buddies during the game. I'm all for it after.

You should buddy the other pokemon that would be entertaining

Haven't been in a fast game in a while. Bottom of page 11.

We still in RVS?

In post 454, Toogeloo wrote:We still in RVS?

How about you vote for a wagon and we'll see

votecount

With 26 alive it takes 14 to lynch.

RCEnigma (4):	Varsoon (17),	Thor665 (61),	Majiffy (197),	BuJaber (262),
DrewVa (3):	BrightEyedFish (192),	Gamma Emerald (268),	Wisdom (289),
Wisdom (3):	DrewVa (295),	Amzela (347),	hebichan (435),
hebichan (2):	Reasonably Rational (57),	CheekyTeeky (69),
Majiffy (2):	Malakitty (42),	Tails (121),
profii (2):	Fortian (111),	pinturicchio (450),
DrippingGoofball (1):	davesaz (56),
BrightEyedFish (1):	Alchemist21 (386),
Reasonably Rational (1):	profii (407),
CheekyTeeky (1):	farside (440),
Not voting (6):	Creature,	Toogeloo,	Chickadee,	DrippingGoofball,	Flavor Leaf (416),	RCEnigma (438),

(expired on 2018-12-04 02:30:00) remain.

I'm glad that both RR and RCE had nothing to say in response to me.
Wild.

In post 455, BuJaber wrote:

In post 454, Toogeloo wrote:We still in RVS?

How about you vote for a wagon and we'll see

d'awww

You know, the nice thing about never playing more than one game at a time is that I don't forget what's going on in regards to me or other things I've been keeping tabs on. I'll almost assuredly never vote in this game until I am absolutely sure no voting shenanigans are afoot, and since I'm pretty well useless to the point of nearly being a Tree Stump, I'll likely be around a while. Problem is, the game gets hard to get invested in when you can't vote, so I found myself glazing over the last 3 pages or so and not really giving a fuck.

I'm mostly just curious how many "serious" votes there are out there, and how many are just sheeps and creeps.

In post 395, Varsoon wrote:Like what were you waiting for?

To finish my reading through the thread.

In post 170, farside wrote: Cheekteeky looks like surface scum hunting. Basically asking questions that give nothing and read as oh I'm going to ask this because i can, not because i want a response.

I've been down this road. It doesn't mean as much as you think it does.

In post 458, Toogeloo wrote:

In post 455, BuJaber wrote:

In post 454, Toogeloo wrote:We still in RVS?

How about you vote for a wagon and we'll see

d'awww

You know, the nice thing about never playing more than one game at a time is that I don't forget what's going on in regards to me or other things I've been keeping tabs on. I'll almost assuredly never vote in this game until I am absolutely sure no voting shenanigans are afoot, and since I'm pretty well useless to the point of nearly being a Tree Stump, I'll likely be around a while. Problem is, the game gets hard to get invested in when you can't vote, so I found myself glazing over the last 3 pages or so and not really giving a fuck.

I'm mostly just curious how many "serious" votes there are out there, and how many are just sheeps and creeps.

You have a vote restriction in your role pm?

Sorry guys still busy atm will contribute later. BuJaber is there a reason you keep shading me without voting?

In post 197, Majiffy wrote:

In post 121, Tails wrote:Yay!

VOTE: Majiffy

Hu da hell r u

A fluffy masochist.
I've brought the whip. Have you brought the safe word?

In post 457, Varsoon wrote:I'm glad that both RR and RCE had nothing to say in response to me.
Wild.

I called you cute, certainly not nothing.

In post 221, RCEnigma wrote:This is just a miscommunication in tone because it is a forum setting. And it's redundant already.

Admittedly I didn't look at the Hebi games that we're brought up, I think that's a legitimate read from RR so despite the non-issue between them and bef, RR is town.

Your suit is looking shiny Mr. Knight.

In post 458, Toogeloo wrote:

In post 455, BuJaber wrote:

In post 454, Toogeloo wrote:We still in RVS?

How about you vote for a wagon and we'll see

d'awww

You know, the nice thing about never playing more than one game at a time is that I don't forget what's going on in regards to me or other things I've been keeping tabs on. I'll almost assuredly never vote in this game until I am absolutely sure no voting shenanigans are afoot, and since I'm pretty well useless to the point of nearly being a Tree Stump, I'll likely be around a while. Problem is, the game gets hard to get invested in when you can't vote, so I found myself glazing over the last 3 pages or so and not really giving a fuck.

I'm mostly just curious how many "serious" votes there are out there, and how many are just sheeps and creeps.

Your claim makes it seem like there could be other vote based roles. Double or hidden voters maybe. I wouldn't put it past A50.

In post 465, Tails wrote:

In post 221, RCEnigma wrote:This is just a miscommunication in tone because it is a forum setting. And it's redundant already.

Admittedly I didn't look at the Hebi games that we're brought up, I think that's a legitimate read from RR so despite the non-issue between them and bef, RR is town.

Your suit is looking shiny Mr. Knight.

Jealous you don't have a spiffy buddy?

In post 457, Varsoon wrote:I'm glad that both RR and RCE had nothing to say in response to me.
Wild.

Honestly, I read your posts and was like hmm, that's more substance than most d1 pushes, I'll look into it when I have time,and also damn I enjoy player Varsoons posting style.

The looking into it just hasn't happened yet.

-Cerb

Bujaber - FL made a good point about grabbing attention. The back and forth with Nancy was exactly that, Don't think Wisdom has anything to gain from the exchange. The pressure on Nancy is nice and Wisdom may not have set it in motion but he did jumpstart it. Sad FL called Nancy town so early.

He also shut Varsoon down which was pretty sweet.

In post 255, RCEnigma wrote:

In post 253, DrewVa wrote:In post 228, pinturicchio wrote:
In post 221, RCEnigma wrote:
This is just a miscommunication in tone because it is a forum setting. And it's redundant already.

Admittedly I didn't look at the Hebi games that we're brought up, I think that's a legitimate read from RR so despite the non-issue between them and bef, RR is town.

I second this with violence.

Also, I agree that RR's read on Hebi was the first detectivesque post and not mine. I believe that RR's effort to take us out of RVS is very clear right now, and I like that. And by like it, I mean "I want you to be town" like it.


This post strikes me as pockety.

~Nancy

I thought so too. Let Dva know you guys can pocket me instead.

But seriously, I hope RR is keeping track and seeing what I'm seeing.

6 people not voting and 4 wagons with only one vote each.
I see some people who need to be more interesting or learn to sheep.
I also just skipped ten pages and feel fine about it.

In post 458, Toogeloo wrote:

In post 455, BuJaber wrote:

In post 454, Toogeloo wrote:We still in RVS?

How about you vote for a wagon and we'll see

d'awww

You know, the nice thing about never playing more than one game at a time is that I don't forget what's going on in regards to me or other things I've been keeping tabs on. I'll almost assuredly never vote in this game until I am absolutely sure no voting shenanigans are afoot, and since I'm pretty well useless to the point of nearly being a Tree Stump, I'll likely be around a while. Problem is, the game gets hard to get invested in when you can't vote, so I found myself glazing over the last 3 pages or so and not really giving a fuck.

I'm mostly just curious how many "serious" votes there are out there, and how many are just sheeps and creeps.

You asked an unnecessary question you should know the answer to. If you are town you can still contribute without voting. I was sympathetic to you getting the role, but you're going to have to pull your weight like the rest. Otherwise you look like 3rd party only interested in staying alive.

In post 462, CheekyTeeky wrote:Sorry guys still busy atm will contribute later. BuJaber is there a reason you keep shading me without voting?

"Keep shading you" sounds worse than the reality. So it's you who's shading me... The first time I mentioned you it had nothing to do with your play. The guy who voted RR over you had seemingly more reasons in his post to suspect you than RR yet he voted RR, it was bad and needed addressing. The second time yeah it's worrying that you're not posting much this game given your usual tendency. However I'd rather keep my vote on RCE. I have more reasons to suspect him than you.

In post 469, RCEnigma wrote:Bujaber - FL made a good point about grabbing attention. The back and forth with Nancy was exactly that, Don't think Wisdom has anything to gain from the exchange. The pressure on Nancy is nice and Wisdom may not have set it in motion but he did jumpstart it. Sad FL called Nancy town so early.

He also shut Varsoon down which was pretty sweet.

For the record this is your best post so far