Mafiascum.net

In post 419, Fish Monger wrote:

In post 33, Fish Monger wrote:Lying maybe, but I trust them to not be Boonskying

But saying they arent gambiting is discourse.

It also has nothing to do with my vote you shot down. Nowhere did I imply my vote had anything to do with gambits.

In post 420, Fish Monger wrote:

In post 417, Chandra Nalaar wrote:that's less than the chance of an average slot being town

I am

not

a mathematician. Its more a confidence interval than a 'chance they are town'. I imply that I have a moderate TR on them for it.

I know I was just being a dick

In post 304, kuribo wrote:There's a huge difference between "Everyone in this neighborhood will investigate as mafia" and "Everyone in this neighborhood is a miller."


There are other kinds of cop besides mafia / not mafia, especially in FakeGod games.

The vast majority of your content is krumpin' over setup details. Things like 'can scum be a miller', 'the non-linearity of space-time, or lack of', and 'If a tree fall in the forest, do you keep the branches after you strip them'.

In post 428, Vecna wrote:Anyways, im just giving you guys the warning im a finnicky guy when I get some modicum of power. I guess its true what they say, those with meager power are more likely to abuse it.

Dont be surprised if I hammer shit out of the blue. Be on your toes, its possible I just suddenly feel like it and decide its good for me to appear a bunch of scummy. Or if I get too cocky and think I might just be a hero. Or just get plain bored.

Hammers at L3? Its a possibility at any time with me around.

woooo, spooky.

Commence the scumreads.

Let people claim before you do this

Other than that, I would probably do the same in your shoes, town or not.

In post 312, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:

In post 27, Marquis wrote:Oh shit I'm a miller forgot to say tghat

I don't see no traces of flour on you. You must be lying.

VOTE: Miller

JJD is a quintuple voter

In post 443, Fish Monger wrote:

In post 173, ofrhz wrote:VOTE: pops

Im here rn to be honest.

Then why is your vote parked on RVS

In post 452, Fish Monger wrote:

In post 304, kuribo wrote:There's a huge difference between "Everyone in this neighborhood will investigate as mafia" and "Everyone in this neighborhood is a miller."


There are other kinds of cop besides mafia / not mafia, especially in FakeGod games.

The vast majority of your content is krumpin' over setup details. Things like 'can scum be a miller', 'the non-linearity of space-time, or lack of', and 'If a tree fall in the forest, do you keep the branches after you strip them'.

Oh shit I'm sorry your highness lemme just go into the wealth of day one information we had to go on bythat point


Or let me expound upon the useless meta of a dozen plus people I've never heard of in my life how bout that


Oooooh wait maybe I can do a catch up post where I ask people meaningless housekeeping questions while trying to pretend they're being mean when it's pointed out how useless that is.

Oh wait you've got that last one covered already damn.

In post 452, Fish Monger wrote:

In post 304, kuribo wrote:There's a huge difference between "Everyone in this neighborhood will investigate as mafia" and "Everyone in this neighborhood is a miller."


There are other kinds of cop besides mafia / not mafia, especially in FakeGod games.

The vast majority of your content is krumpin' over setup details. Things like 'can scum be a miller', 'the non-linearity of space-time, or lack of', and 'If a tree fall in the forest, do you keep the branches after you strip them'.

And you know what I never once Fucking asked if scum can be a miller WHAT I FUCKING ASKED IS IF THE PEOPLE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTIGATE AS SCUM OR IF MILLER IS A ROLE NAME

so stop trying to god damn twist shit around

I fucking hate disingenuous bullshit


Oh he's being mean


Oh he asked if scum can be millers


Oh he said on page four that one of the millers must be scum before more information comes out


Either you done fell on your damn head or you're intentionally twisting my words to come at me so WHICH IS IT and either answer is acceptable

I fell on my head earlier today

In post 267, Gorkington wrote:wow why not just call pine scum and steal ALL MY READS while youre at it :p

I'm not sold on Pinescum.

In post 281, Gorkington wrote:threaten to beat people up if they dont wagon pine that way theyll be too scared of your fists to vote you

Oh? We . . . Gonna have a bad time?

In post 371, Chandra Nalaar wrote:VOTE: fish boy

In post 385, Fish Monger wrote:Okay.

Let's talk TONIGHT

I would have preferred to sort out my hood before having a day; to give me a place to start my reads. At least this miller garbo isnt affecting me too much.

In post 392, popsofctown wrote:i'm very annoyed by the massclaim

Im of the opinion that once the first miller claim came out the rest should have as a matter of course.

Also, says the massclaim is bad, votes somebody who vocalizes that opinion.

In post 398, Bingle wrote:

In post 334, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:I'm an alt of Karl Urban. Only I'm much sexier

Just noticed this. Covering the Eyebrows makes you like 30% as sexy, max.

I have once gotten my eyebrows trimmed. I was called cy-brow in high school, they were so thick and threatening to merge. Plucking them once at a salon and I'm suave years later.

In post 401, Flavor Leaf wrote:That’s lightweight a hatchet

I do not believe in 'hatchet' There is only 'chainsaw'.

In post 409, Vecna wrote:This is not how it is for us guys.

Annnd, this but from pops I ignored as they tangeted around the world, but yea. Is pops accusing FG of making a hood full of millers and then not informing the scum that they are all millers? Sounds . . . like a bastard thing to do to a player.

In post 458, kuribo wrote:I fucking hate disingenuous bullshit


Oh he's being mean


Oh he asked if scum can be millers


Oh he said on page four that one of the millers must be scum before more information comes out


Either you done fell on your damn head or you're intentionally twisting my words to come at me so WHICH IS IT and either answer is acceptable

AANNNND IGNORE

Ignore this, you lying dumbass

In post 461, Fish Monger wrote:

In post 458, kuribo wrote:I fucking hate disingenuous bullshit


Oh he's being mean


Oh he asked if scum can be millers


Oh he said on page four that one of the millers must be scum before more information comes out


Either you done fell on your damn head or you're intentionally twisting my words to come at me so WHICH IS IT and either answer is acceptable

AANNNND IGNORE

All I said in my last post referencing you is that you are lacking reads and real content. Actually thats wrong; that was all implied by the point of 'youre only arguing about setup spec and non sequiturs.'

I think its, taken without meta, scummy. Ive already asked people their opinion of your play from that meta perspective. I do not wish to engage.

In post 406, Vecna wrote:

In post 319, Kagami wrote:

In post 80, Marquis wrote: Marquis
PenguinPower

Chandra Nalaar

Fish Monger

ofrhz
Croag
Kagami
Bingle
Day One Lynch
Vecna
Perry Pelican
Judge Joseph Dredd
Gorkington
popsofctown
kuribo
Flavor Leaf

Pine?

I think this list is almost suspiciously good for post #80, including the aspects that make almost no sense, and I would like to subscribe to marquis's newletter.

A list with 4 reads is too good for post #80?

I had thought the middle group was ordered townish to scummish, and carried a remarkable amount of seemingly impossible insight, but I see that it's just playerlist order. Shrug.

In post 463, kuribo wrote:Ignore this, you lying dumbass

Vote: Fish Monger

lol

have a good day kiddo

Marquis Pelican
PenguinP Gork
--The Rest--
Chandra
Kuribo Flavor
Pops

In post 460, Fish Monger wrote:Also, says the massclaim is bad, votes somebody who vocalizes that opinion

Because once you agree with someone you enter into a life pact and can never suspect each other

Thats taking my point to a very strawmanish extreme. Its a measure of dissonance, and I am voting them as well after all.

"Ignored blocked deleted"
>promptly responds

In post 469, Fish Monger wrote:Thats taking my point to a very strawmanish extreme. Its a measure of dissonance, and I am voting them as well after all.

I was pointing out that your point sucked

In post 464, Fish Monger wrote:

In post 461, Fish Monger wrote:

In post 458, kuribo wrote:I fucking hate disingenuous bullshit


Oh he's being mean


Oh he asked if scum can be millers


Oh he said on page four that one of the millers must be scum before more information comes out


Either you done fell on your damn head or you're intentionally twisting my words to come at me so WHICH IS IT and either answer is acceptable

AANNNND IGNORE

All I said in my last post referencing you is that you are lacking reads and real content. Actually thats wrong; that was all implied by the point of 'youre only arguing about setup spec and non sequiturs.'

I think its, taken without meta, scummy. Ive already asked people their opinion of your play from that meta perspective. I do not wish to engage.

If you don't wish to engage, you shoulda fucking thought about that before you baselessly accused me of being mean (I caught scum-Carl Tuckerson the last game I was in because he did the same shit), you misrepresented a number of my posts, as I've pointed out, and then when you summon me from hell, you're like oh no I'm backing off.

In post 472, kuribo wrote:you baselessly accused me of being mean

I am beginning to get flustered with your shit kid. do you have citations.

In post 442, Fish Monger wrote:change

This shows a very obvious familiarity with my playstyle, I damn sure wasn't being mean to you or anyone else at that point