Mafiascum.net

Lynching

With 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to lynch.

january

(2): Vorkuta, Zenith

GeorgeBailey

(2): DrDolittle, skitter30

Jamelia

(2): january, tictac

Zenith

(1): GeorgeBailey

Not Voting

(2): Suspicious, Jamelia

Deadline:

(expired on 2019-10-27 08:30:00).

[/area]

It's not entirely but the fact that you're being evasive isnt helping.

A lot of how i form reads is by gauging whether or not a person is out of their scumrange
(Or, in this queue, gauging whether a behavior is likely to come from a new town player or not)

You feel kinda townie but i dont know what your scumrange is. If you're a new player with little experience i'd probably be straight up townreading you. But with more context - how good your scumgame is - i probably would not be, so i'm trying to get that context that would enable me to form a more accurate assessment of how townie you're being *for you*

But you're not answering so

Why do you think this is a trap question?

In my experience, that kind of question is used to force a player to explain how they approach the game from a town/maf/etc. perspective, and it's used to have the player make a perceived slip that can translate into a lynch. It's been used against me as mafia and it's been used against me as town; it could be different here, but I'm used to it being a tactic.

My scum game is inconsistent because I like to toy with meta, since everyone loves to put so much stake into it. If anything, I'm more blunt as town when I get down to making accusations and I don't care as much about upsetting people if I push them/I don't go for the easy mislynch.

You can see my previous game if you need a comparison.

Ok. I'll see if i can check that game out after work

It wasnt a trap question, but i dont townread u anymore either

Since this is a Plotinus game I'll post cute bunny-pics for folks who vote Jam
People who don't vote for Jam don't get no bunny-pics

@january: Here is yours

This is but a small sample of what I can offer folks

In post 443, Suspicious wrote:Part of your push on Jam is that they haven't passed any reads/did not confidently read tic as either scum or town.

I think you’re misreading every single thing i’ve said lol

i’m not pushing on jamelia for not having reads

i’m pushing on jamelia for seemingly townreading tictac - we both agree that jamelia was giving tictac a “townpass” in that one post, right?

i’m saying jamelia is scum because they townread tictac for no reason.

i brought up jamelia having no previous reads to support my argument that Jamelia has no reason to townread tictac

jamelia assumes the person with “bad logic” tunneling her is town - why? because he’s mafia

does this finally make sense to you or are you just trying to sound dense

sorry wrong pronoun
** jamelia assumes the person with “bad logic” tunneling is town - why? because he’s mafia

In post 443, Suspicious wrote: You also did much the same at the start of the game in #83 when you questioned Suspy's vote on Bailey, stating it was a weak/baseless read, which ignored the actual reasoning provided.

is that what you thought i was doing the whole time lol

i wasn’t questioning your vote for being wishy-washy weak (like what you’re saying my reads are)

i was questioning it for being weak - as in it has bad logic to support the read

And, for what it's worth, all I can gather from your own reads are a scumlean on Suspy, townlean on Zenith, and scumread on Jam, with a potential side of Vork.

good for you! you guessed my reads congrats! do you want a bunny as a reward?

it’s not like you’ve made your reads that much stronger lol

the only one that matters right now is that i clearly scumread jamelia - the rest are subject to change but hey let’s vote jamelia and figure it out later

Y’all are going hard on me being lynched when I haven’t done anything scummy.

I am not sure why you are trying to rush a lynch on me. What’s the urgency of lynching me?

In post 441, Vorkuta wrote:

In post 439, january wrote:does either person voting me have any reason behind the vote or are they both still votes for pressure even though we're at a point where we should be actually voting to lynch

Yeah- posts like these.
I'll consolidate when/if necessary, but no

lol

any posts before that? or did you just forget why and you’re just making up stuff now

Lol between you and Zenith both, can we cut the petty insults? I almost want to lynch out of spite.

So we have tictac posting pictures of bunnies for me to be lynched
January trying to rush lynch me

I’m genuinely curious how this makes sense

In post 456, january wrote:

In post 443, Suspicious wrote:Part of your push on Jam is that they haven't passed any reads/did not confidently read tic as either scum or town.

I think you’re misreading every single thing i’ve said lol

i’m not pushing on jamelia for not having reads

i’m pushing on jamelia for seemingly townreading tictac - we both agree that jamelia was giving tictac a “townpass” in that one post, right?

i’m saying jamelia is scum because they townread tictac for no reason.

i brought up jamelia having no previous reads to support my argument that Jamelia has no reason to townread tictac

jamelia assumes the person with “bad logic” tunneling her is town - why? because he’s mafia

does this finally make sense to you or are you just trying to sound dense

When did I townread Tictac and give them a pass? I said they’re going to have an egg on their face when I get lynched and flip green. Whether they’re town/mafia doesn’t matter in this scenario. If they’re town, they’re going to look dumb for hard lynching someone who isn’t mafia. If THEY’RE mafia, they’re going to look bad for hard lynching me and an unnecessary target on their back.

Regardless. If they’re town and I get lynched, they’re gonna blame ME for “not being a cooperative town”, and won’t see why their analysis of me is dreadfully flawed. At this point nothing is going to change in my opinion.

I’m still trying to figure out who I’m personally leaning toward. I need to analyze this more

There's a marked difference in Jam behavior that coincides w the replacements arriving.
My thinking on that: Skitt is a much better coach than CJ was.

@susp ya don't want a bunny? I'm sad.
I only dole them out for Jam-votes tho, not for guessing reads.

Or maybe jan offered to post one herself? In that case I must object. Bunnies are my thing.

In post 464, tictac wrote:There's a marked difference in Jam behavior that coincides w the replacements arriving.
My thinking on that: Skitt is a much better coach than CJ was.

@susp ya don't want a bunny? I'm sad.
I only dole them out for Jam-votes tho, not for guessing reads.

Replacements came when I was prodded. So I got emailed. And so I came back on the website because I felt ready to come back.

I can’t argue with you anymore about this

Sure, i would be, but i'm not scum here

What do you think of susp, tictac?

In post 464, tictac wrote:There's a marked difference in Jam behavior that coincides w the replacements arriving.
My thinking on that: Skitt is a much better coach than CJ was.

@susp ya don't want a bunny? I'm sad.
I only dole them out for Jam-votes tho, not for guessing reads.

VOTE: january

How am I doing, chief?

I'm p sure january is town, even if i disagree with most of their reasoning

I'm not a superfan, kinda been pairing him w zen tho, that 'chainsaw for jam' thing was mostly a joke.
He does get activity cred that's viable on day 1 tho.

In post 469, skitter30 wrote:I'm p sure january is town

and I agree w most of her reasoning

I can look into susp more, but i dunno if i wanna go there day1

I kinda doubt this is happening in the next 36 hours but i would like to note how i'm reading him ^