Mafiascum.net

In post 449, Severa wrote:The idea that scum me cares about your vote on me is stupid.

In post 451, Severa wrote:Town me doesn't actually care either, just so you know.

In post 451, Severa wrote:Town me doesn't actually care either, just so you know.

In post 433, Severa wrote:

In post 430, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think “Severa is trying to dominate the game” is a pretty play based reason

Did I or did I not attempt to dominate the game in literally every game when I've been town? Given that that is obviously true, how can it be a scumtell?

In post 446, Kerset wrote:Isn't that cool that both Fark and severa have same tactic but execute it differently. Even that they didn't know each other, sev quickly recognized what Fark opening was about. Also Fark instantly called first seve claim as bs. Interaction worth to be noted.

In post 435, Severa wrote:Like you called me scum last game for trying to dominate the game. So it's clearly not a good reason to call me scum. Why are you still using a reason as town that over a sample size of over 100 games I do as town 90%+ of the time? That's not honest sorting

In post 436, Severa wrote:Last game here now using your parlance of Masquerade.

In post 444, Bitmap wrote:

In post 442, Salamence20 wrote:Why is anyone even giving SEVERA the time of day until she proves it with a shot.

Hi Salamance qt. How are u? What are your thoughts on Evenstar?

Severa wrote:The idea that scum me cares about your vote on me is stupid.

In post 439, Severa wrote:So like, no, your actual reason for scumreading me is not "because I'm trying to dominate the game." I'm not stupid and the other players in the game aren't stupid. The fact that in a year where I'm running around with a 70% town winrate as people complain about site town winrates falling and you still managed to be the first dude in site history to errantly vig me as town, then later commented that it was the "correct and pro-town play", says that your problem isn't with anything I'm doing in this game. It's with me. And that's not fair to me.

In post 460, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 439, Severa wrote:So like, no, your actual reason for scumreading me is not "because I'm trying to dominate the game." I'm not stupid and the other players in the game aren't stupid. The fact that in a year where I'm running around with a 70% town winrate as people complain about site town winrates falling and you still managed to be the first dude in site history to errantly vig me as town, then later commented that it was the "correct and pro-town play", says that your problem isn't with anything I'm doing in this game. It's with me. And that's not fair to me.

Well I do have a problem with you. You talk about me empirically scumreading you when your town but what about the fact you let scumreads on you screw up your ability to play well and then say the blame is on others? People are allowed to suspect you, and you can’t change that unless your play can radically change. So instead of expecting others to curve around your temperament you should work to fix your habit. “You are the only person you can control” and all that jazz.

In post 458, Bitmap wrote:VOTE: Venus and Mars

In post 448, Evenstar wrote:

In post 397, Severa wrote:Ok, my hood and I have discussed this and I'm going to open this to the floor
My actual abilities are day desperado -> day vig and using combined abilities we can get me up to 100 MP today
I am going to therefore be using the desperado today but I would prefer to use it on someone who, if it fails, is going to actually be useful to town.

So, ignoring my reads momentarily and focusing on the people that I think have some utility as town leader

Evenstar
Farkran
Venus & Mars (Primarily aimed at ND39, but if she continues lurking we're going to lynch rather than desp this slot)
Kerset
Salamence20

How effectively do you think you perform as IC, what are your reads right now, do you have any shot recommendations

... So Severa posts this at 3:45, gets into an argument with Gamma that lasts until 4:19, and then when I post suspecting her based on her differences in tone between this and Magical Girl Mafia she disappears. It's currently 4:55 and there's no sign of her.

When reading high-level players I tend to assume that everything is deliberate. From that perspective, this looks very, very bad. I've never seen Severa

flinch from a suspicion

before. I thought she might be going to fetch her towngames for me, but now it's been like half an hour; Ego Search ought to make it fast for her to just toss me one or two, and she was very definitely still in the thread when I posted my initial read of her.

I feel quite comfortable with this vote right now.

VOTE: Severa

In post 453, Evenstar wrote:

In post 451, Severa wrote:Town me doesn't actually care either, just so you know.

Does town you care about my wasting my time casing you when I could be doing better and more productive things?

In post 198, Severa wrote:Vote Salamence or vote me and get me out of this game all you scrubby scrub scrub WOATs!!!!!

In post 205, Severa wrote:I have a one use day parity cop ability that I used like after a little posting and Salamence20 / TemporalLich are of opposite alignments

In post 216, Salamence20 wrote:This is a cute gambit.

I highly doubt severa is an investigative role, because I am a rolecop

In post 236, Salamence20 wrote:

In post 230, Bitmap wrote:Hot take: Severa and Salamance could be town together?

Unless you believe severa, that means TL is scum right?

In post 254, Alchemist21 wrote:

In post 245, Bitmap wrote:Y'all seriously going to take sheepy mc sheep Alchemist and not push him?

Explain how it’s scummy and maybe they will.

Of course then they’d be sheeping you and you’d have to vote them too.

In post 264, Salamence20 wrote:

In post 244, Farkran wrote:I think only the magia part of salamence claim is bs

The rest is true

Why would I lie about 1 part

In post 268, Severa wrote:Farkran is just... not posting great things.