Aldus you called the vote on me lazy but I don’t think you’re townreading me?
Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2019 4:04 pm
by Alduskkel
Why do I have to townread you to see HH's vote on you as lazy?
For the record, you're squarely at "null" for me right now.
Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2019 4:23 pm
by JJJ
If people are going to keep calling me scummy for trying to get slots that are voting the moderator to actually play the game then I'm not thinking this is gonna be a very productive day.
-X
Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2019 4:25 pm
by Chemist1422
In post 453, JJJ wrote:If people are going to keep calling me scummy for trying to get slots that are voting the moderator to actually play the game then I'm not thinking this is gonna be a very productive day.
-X
May I direct you to today’s date
Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2019 4:27 pm
by Alduskkel
Voting chemist isn't going to make him play the game.
Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2019 4:37 pm
by Alduskkel
Like, explain what scenario you're imagining where your vote on Chemist does something. Because in my experience, voting players who aren't being "productive" doesn't make them produce more content.
In post 453, JJJ wrote:If people are going to keep calling me scummy for trying to get slots that are voting the moderator to actually play the game then I'm not thinking this is gonna be a very productive day.
-X
May I direct you to today’s date
day as in phase
In post 456, Alduskkel wrote:Like, explain what scenario you're imagining where your vote on Chemist does something. Because in my experience, voting players who aren't being "productive" doesn't make them produce more content.
in a perfect world more people join me in voting him until he either does something or gets lynched for just voting the moderator and not really contributing to discussion. I'm really not understanding the lack of acknowledgement towards pressure from this player list.
-X
Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2019 9:37 pm
by Alduskkel
Well, this isn't a perfect world. Plus, lynching people for reasons like that isn't really any more likely to hit scum than a random lynch. So I don't see how your Chemist vote is a real attempt at scumhunting.
Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2019 10:20 pm
by Datisi
Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2019 11:33 pm
by Iconeum
VOTE: aldus
L1
Claim
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2019 2:58 am
by JJJ
In post 458, Alduskkel wrote:Well, this isn't a perfect world. Plus, lynching people for reasons like that isn't really any more likely to hit scum than a random lynch. So I don't see how your Chemist vote is a real attempt at scumhunting.
ok so by your logic you are implying that even in a perfect world where a chemist wagon becomes a thing he is just gonna continue to vote the moderator and contribute nothing?
Therefore you are completely denying that vote/wagon pressure is even a thing and by that same logic implying that chemist will do nothing this game unless he decides he wants to. So how would that be a bad lynch?
-X
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2019 4:40 am
by Uncrowned
After rereading, I'm kind of concerned about this wagon on Aldus. I was suspicious of it earlier, since I liked Ico's thought of it trying to get on what it thought could be an easy wagon, but now I'm having second thoughts. Can someone give a brief case on something I'm missing in it's ISO that could be triggering?
I don't think it's a particularly strong town slot here, but I've seen some posts I kind of like.
Here's what I'm going to do:
I'm going to give
intent to hammer
to ensure we get a claim
But I'm also going to put my current vote elsewhere. I like the Emps slot, so my vote there is useless atm.
VOTE: Chemist
I'm self-aware enough to know this is a bad look, but I need something from the Chemist slot. Maybe this vote does nothing, but a counterwagon here is semi-useful at the least imo.
(Also please correct me Aldus if I'm using your pronoun wrong, I'm not experienced with it)
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2019 4:42 am
by Uncrowned
I also agree with HH that if Chemist isn't going to be productive, he's somewhat anti-town in the sense that our read accuracy is damaged a bit.
Content from that slot would be very useful rn imo
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2019 6:14 am
by emps
woo yeah lets go pg 19 7 days till deadline lets get a claim allldussss
In post 453, JJJ wrote:If people are going to keep calling me scummy for trying to get slots that are voting the moderator to actually play the game then I'm not thinking this is gonna be a very productive day.
-X
In post 453, JJJ wrote:If people are going to keep calling me scummy for trying to get slots that are voting the moderator to actually play the game then I'm not thinking this is gonna be a very productive day.
-X
In post 461, JJJ wrote:So how would that be a bad lynch?
because it doesn’t help us lynch scum unless chemist is coincidentally scum
[quote="Uncrowned”](Also please correct me Aldus if I'm using your pronoun wrong, I'm not experienced with it)[/quote]Icon’s pronoun is “it,” not me. My pronouns are he/him/his. How’d you get us confused?
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2019 12:55 pm
by Uncrowned
Ah geez my bad lol
This is why I shouldn't play mafia at nearly 3am
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2019 2:49 pm
by Alduskkel
I'm just gonna come out and say that anyone who doesn't read or at least look at Micro 900 isn't doing their due diligence in reading me, Menalque, Iconeum, or emps.
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2019 5:39 pm
by JJJ
In post 472, Alduskkel wrote:I'm just gonna come out and say that anyone who doesn't read or at least look at Micro 900 isn't doing their due diligence in reading me, Menalque, Iconeum, or emps.
I'm not going to read Micro 900 but also I don't really think you're flipping scum which is why I'm not voting you. I've played enough with the other three to have a decent grasp of their metas.
-X
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2019 5:41 pm
by JJJ
If you do flip red I'm powerlynching chemist though