Page 19 of 67

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 1:44 am
by Brian Skies
In post 406, Wondertime wrote:
In post 366, Bitmap wrote:VOTE: Eragon

I support this. The first few pages were just fluff posting from Eragon.
SO WHY AREN'T WE KILLING THIS?
Are you advocating Bitmap's or Eragon's death here?

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 1:45 am
by Brian Skies
In post 408, Espeonage wrote:They theory. Why didn't Adorable OMGUS Brian if they thought it was a naked serious vote with no real reasoning.

Does it mean Adorable is scared?

Like the closest thing to analysis is a soft omegas without a vote.
Adorable did actually OMGUS vote me.

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 1:53 am
by Brian Skies
In post 421, Farkran wrote:I think you need to elaborate better on your read of Eragon. And Shadowless.

Also, while i might agree with you on Adorable, i think the proper way to address the issue would have been asking Adorable to elaborate their reads first. Why do you assume there should have been suspicion? Do you have any suspicion towards Xtoxm, Norway and Bitmap?
No, I don't.

I feel like I've already been fairly straightforward regarding Adorable's reads. It doesn't have to do with me thinking Xtoxm, Norway, or Bitmap being suspicious, but me thinking Adorable threw out easy townreads without reasoning and hasn't pushed anything resembling an fos or scumread up to this point.

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 2:06 am
by Farkran
In post 452, Brian Skies wrote:
In post 421, Farkran wrote:I think you need to elaborate better on your read of Eragon. And Shadowless.

Also, while i might agree with you on Adorable, i think the proper way to address the issue would have been asking Adorable to elaborate their reads first. Why do you assume there should have been suspicion? Do you have any suspicion towards Xtoxm, Norway and Bitmap?
No, I don't.

I feel like I've already been fairly straightforward regarding Adorable's reads. It doesn't have to do with me thinking Xtoxm, Norway, or Bitmap being suspicious, but me thinking Adorable threw out easy townreads without reasoning and hasn't pushed anything resembling an fos or scumread up to this point.
What about my other questions?

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 2:07 am
by Brian Skies
What did you ask me?

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 2:09 am
by Farkran
In post 421, Farkran wrote:I think you need to elaborate better on your read of Eragon. And Shadowless.
In post 421, Farkran wrote: Why do you assume there should have been suspicion?
In post 421, Farkran wrote: Do you have any suspicion towards Xtoxm, Norway and Bitmap?
All of these are independent questions

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 2:10 am
by Brian Skies
I literally just responded to those.

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 2:11 am
by Farkran
...i only see you talking about Adorable? Did i miss anything?

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 2:13 am
by Brian Skies
In post 421, Farkran wrote:I think you need to elaborate better on your read of Eragon. And Shadowless.
I don't need to elaborate on this, so I won't.
In post 421, Farkran wrote:Why do you assume there should have been suspicion?
I don't understand what you're asking here.

I don't believe the slot was scumhunting, hence the 'lack of suspicion from this slot'.
In post 421, Farkran wrote:Do you have any suspicion towards Xtoxm, Norway and Bitmap?
No, but that is not the point.

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 2:16 am
by Farkran
I understand that you're trying to sort Adorable, i was just asking for your stance about those slots, independent of Adorable existence in this game

Now you answered me about bitmap/toxm/norway, thanks

I will come back about eragon and shadowless at a later time

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 2:18 am
by Brian Skies
I appreciate your understanding.

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 3:05 am
by Shadowlesscloud
In post 361, Amrun wrote:
In post 360, Shadowlesscloud wrote:
In post 355, Amrun wrote:
In post 15, Espeonage wrote:
If there is a majority for the student council election before there is a majority for the day's Lynch does the hood happen straight away and is it locked in or still changable?

Does the Student Council have day talk?


If the answer is the election happens whenever that hits majority first and there is day talk, I think it's likely better to do that first as I feel like whoever wins it out of me and bitty likely gets a target on their back.
In post 17, Torque wrote:
Student council election votes are finalized at the end of the day.

Doesn’t seem like a lie.
I’d consider that bastard.

Fake mod announcers are not new to upicks
Upicks *are* bastard. Last game had a role that posted mod announcements that contained false information soooo

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 3:16 am
by Shadowlesscloud
also ngl. I forgot how long phases are on this site aaa

Im not good with reads over long periods of time

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 3:17 am
by Shadowlesscloud
Also i think im in a neighborhood by my self?

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 3:54 am
by Xtoxm
In post 369, Yumeko and Kirari wrote:i wanna fuckin meme but I just fucked up my arm real bad

Y is gonna have to handle our slot for a bit sorry

X when does your ability activate?

-K
at the end of the night like other abilities i'd expect - nothing in my role pm to indicate otherwise

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 4:01 am
by Xtoxm
if shireen's slot reps out without posting, i want it gone
thats rand wolf sub out if ive ever seen it

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 4:07 am
by Xtoxm
Spoiler: rejected pick
Image

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 4:15 am
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 465, Xtoxm wrote:if shireen's slot reps out without posting, i want it gone
thats rand wolf sub out if ive ever seen it
Oh, that slot hasn't posted even once.

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 4:24 am
by Amrun
In post 461, Shadowlesscloud wrote:
In post 361, Amrun wrote:
In post 360, Shadowlesscloud wrote:
In post 355, Amrun wrote:
In post 15, Espeonage wrote:
If there is a majority for the student council election before there is a majority for the day's Lynch does the hood happen straight away and is it locked in or still changable?

Does the Student Council have day talk?


If the answer is the election happens whenever that hits majority first and there is day talk, I think it's likely better to do that first as I feel like whoever wins it out of me and bitty likely gets a target on their back.
In post 17, Torque wrote:
Student council election votes are finalized at the end of the day.

Doesn’t seem like a lie.
I’d consider that bastard.

Fake mod announcers are not new to upicks
Upicks *are* bastard. Last game had a role that posted mod announcements that contained false information soooo

Was this game on mafia scum?

I don’t have an expectation for upicks to be bastard.

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 4:25 am
by Torque
For the sake of not letting out of game issues affect the flow of the game, you guys should read this post below.
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p11606168

So I am going to give Shireen 48 hours from the time PenguinPower posted his response to post here and confirm his spot before replacing them.

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 4:25 am
by Shadowlesscloud
In post 468, Amrun wrote:
In post 461, Shadowlesscloud wrote:
In post 361, Amrun wrote:
In post 360, Shadowlesscloud wrote:
In post 355, Amrun wrote:
In post 15, Espeonage wrote:
If there is a majority for the student council election before there is a majority for the day's Lynch does the hood happen straight away and is it locked in or still changable?

Does the Student Council have day talk?


If the answer is the election happens whenever that hits majority first and there is day talk, I think it's likely better to do that first as I feel like whoever wins it out of me and bitty likely gets a target on their back.
In post 17, Torque wrote:
Student council election votes are finalized at the end of the day.

Doesn’t seem like a lie.
I’d consider that bastard.

Fake mod announcers are not new to upicks
Upicks *are* bastard. Last game had a role that posted mod announcements that contained false information soooo

Was this game on mafia scum?

I don’t have an expectation for upicks to be bastard.
same host but no. i posted the link in chat already

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 4:32 am
by Bitmap
In post 387, Amrun wrote:
In post 386, Yumeko and Kirari wrote:
In post 380, Amrun wrote:Seems like a backward justification of a sheep on Eragon.
Well that's what you asked us for, so...

-Y

No, I didn’t ask you to make a poor vote and then half ass a reason to sheep.

Sheeping is fine, or can be. I don’t like how you went about it.

Bitmap’s similar vote didn’t bother me - it’s all in the execution.
In post 389, Amrun wrote:I didn’t mind the vote; I was just curious at first. I didn’t like their answer to my question.

I think bitmap sheeping you contextually makes sense and bitmap gave Norwegian a TR for being the only one to not flufflpost in that same timeframe so it’s internally consistent. Even if it’s just a random fluff poster to choochoo - works for now (for me).
This makes no sense to me. I think my vote was obviously much more scummier than YK.

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 4:41 am
by Bitmap
VOTE: Adorable

Generally weak reads and their town reads have no real effort behind it and seems like they just ripped them from Farkran. Their interactions with Brian was bad as well.

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 4:45 am
by Bitmap
YK isn't a bad wagon but it seems the premise for that wagon was their vote on Eragon as the second vote and being scummy while I basically got a free pass for being the third vote seemed pretty bad reasoning overall.

@YK:
Who are you townreading and scumreading atm?

Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2020 5:19 am
by Farkran
In post 472, Bitmap wrote:VOTE: Adorable

Generally weak reads and their town reads have no real effort behind it and seems like they just ripped them from Farkran. Their interactions with Brian was bad as well.
In post 473, Bitmap wrote:YK isn't a bad wagon but it seems the premise for that wagon was their vote on Eragon as the second vote and being scummy while I basically got a free pass for being the third vote seemed pretty bad reasoning overall.

@YK:
Who are you townreading and scumreading atm?
I support this line of thought, but i want to clarify that my scumlean of YK has little to do with their vote, which is just part of an overall tendency to look like they're doing things whereas they aren't. It's very early, but all i see them doing is asking questions but not drawing conclusions from answers. There's no depth in their posts, just surface-level busywork. I could say the same about adorable.

I think i have reconsidered my previous read of shadowless, still not hood-worthy though, in my opinion.

@Bitmap do you think Amrun is up to something bad?