Mafiascum.net

VC 1.3

popsofctown (4):

Ame, Taly, Robbnva, eyestott

TheFuzzylogic99 (3):

Yshtola Rhul, Taco, popsofctown

Paragon (3):

Aloratom, Rabid Schnauzer, Wiisp

Taco (1):

Paragon

Not Voting:

TheFuzzylogic99

With 12 alive it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline:

(expired on 2020-03-30 07:05:00)

Mod notice

• Rabid Schnauzer asked for a replacement.
  
  
• Robbnva asked for a replacement.
  
  [/color]

Ame, do you see pops play there as scummy or just douchey?

I am still baffled about my joking being displeasurable or upsetting

I have trouble feeling guilty about RS's replaceout if it possibly has some correlation to rolling red here. I also have trouble feeling guilty about not following normative "culture" practices of player for someone who has broken written site rules twice in their replaceout procedure

*play, not player

In post 391, Yshtola Rhul wrote:How confident are you in your reads at this point?

Pretty

In post 412, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:he'll be a liabiliity in lylo (endgame), as he can't be trusted to be telling the truth.

This

Can we talk about something else please? You’re gonna have to redeem yourself for there to be any hope of me changing my vote.
Robbnva, we haven’t talked much. Are you sane?

In post 425, popsofctown wrote:

In post 422, eyestott wrote:There is none, yet you’re claiming that you’ll have a post restriction when Yshtola votes you, even though it wasn’t enforced by the only authority in the game?
And I said halfspeak, not maybespeak

I am hardclaiming that I have a post restriction that would trigger if Yshtola was to vote me

I think it benefits the gamestate to provide this information

It benefits the game state to tell town you’re going to fake a post restriction? Go away scum boy

In post 444, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:

In post 440, eyestott wrote:

In post 438, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:This is ridiculous. I'm going to have mod impose a permanent post restriction on me. Bye.

I regret becoming active in this discussion.

That was me saying I'm replacing out. This is more a kindergarten class than a mafia game.

Don’t blame you tbh

In post 452, popsofctown wrote:I am still baffled about my joking being displeasurable or upsetting

I have trouble feeling guilty about RS's replaceout if it possibly has some correlation to rolling red here. I also have trouble feeling guilty about not following normative "culture" practices of player for someone who has broken written site rules twice in their replaceout procedure

Man you really are a piece of work.

In post 456, eyestott wrote:Can we talk about something else please? You’re gonna have to redeem yourself for there to be any hope of me changing my vote.
Robbnva, we haven’t talked much. Are you sane?

Doesn’t matter if I am or not.

@eyes I haven't read the past few pages but based off a skim I'd say neither!

In post 457, Robbnva wrote:

In post 425, popsofctown wrote:

In post 422, eyestott wrote:There is none, yet you’re claiming that you’ll have a post restriction when Yshtola votes you, even though it wasn’t enforced by the only authority in the game?
And I said halfspeak, not maybespeak

I am hardclaiming that I have a post restriction that would trigger if Yshtola was to vote me

I think it benefits the gamestate to provide this information

It benefits the game state to tell town you’re going to fake a post restriction? Go away scum boy

I've already outlined how I think it has. For someone who has criticized the use of buzzwords, you're dropping the word "fake" and expecting the negative word to prove a negative alignment, but it's more complex than that and you ought to be trying to understand my motivations. What do you think I was trying to accomplish, Robbnva?

I'm not going to be able to read you accurately if you just superficially throw shade

In post 460, Robbnva wrote:

In post 456, eyestott wrote:Can we talk about something else please? You’re gonna have to redeem yourself for there to be any hope of me changing my vote.
Robbnva, we haven’t talked much. Are you sane?

Doesn’t matter if I am or not.

Good enough for me


Anything you wanna discuss?
Pedit: @ame: what, you think that as town, it would be a completely morally clean play to make?

In post 387, popsofctown wrote:

In post 384, Ame wrote:pops do you have a posting restriction that requires Ysha to vote you?

I forget you're a site newb
Let's say that if I do there will be a ban announcement following the game and nomnomnom would need a comoderator for her next two games.

She explained it here so it was obvious she was joking. I think you guys way overreacted.

In post 464, Ame wrote:

In post 387, popsofctown wrote:

In post 384, Ame wrote:pops do you have a posting restriction that requires Ysha to vote you?

I forget you're a site newb
Let's say that if I do there will be a ban announcement following the game and nomnomnom would need a comoderator for her next two games.

She explained it here so it was obvious she was joking. I think you guys way overreacted.

I don’t understand how it was explained there. Is this an injoke or something?

It was explained before that because this is a normal game, post restrictions aren't allowed.
pops is confirming that is the case there.
Para is just being silly, he doesn't really have a restriction nor does pops.

Ame, have you positively identified any Sin Eaters?

eyes can you order these from most preferable to you to least preferable: playing mafia, attending a concert, watching an episode of your favorite show, attending a sports game

Yes Ysha, pops is a Sin Eater, just not for the post restriction thing. I have some hints as to the others but I'm not ready to pursue them just yet.

In post 466, Ame wrote:It was explained before that because this is a normal game, post restrictions aren't allowed.
pops is confirming that is the case there.
Para is just being silly, he doesn't really have a restriction nor does pops.

I think I understand, but pops then refuted what she said there when I talked to her about it

Anyways. Ame. Are you an aphantasic? And you got anything else you wanna discuss?

Pedit: oh you’ve asked me stuff!

In post 468, Ame wrote:eyes can you order these from most preferable to you to least preferable: playing mafia, attending a concert, watching an episode of your favorite show, attending a sports game

If the game of mafia is engaging enough (typically it reaches this point on day two or three), it would be

Mafia, concert, fave show, sports
Yesterday and most of today, mafia was 3rd. When I started getting engaged tonight, it went back up to first. But when rabid replaces out, 4th. Now I’d say it’s second.

Where would you place shopping, reading a book, and going to an amusement park on that list?

The way you speak is so similar to me it's uncanny reading your posts sometimes.

I don't have aphantasia. I'm in cognitive neuroscience and visualization is something I'm particularly interested in. Do you mind if I ask you some stuff later?

I have to prepare for more exams but I'll be back later.

Rob I was really looking forward to playing with you :[