Mafiascum.net

In post 427, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I think some three of the most non active people voting baltar shows that he is town

In post 449, NoPowerOverMe wrote:What does sodding mean?

In post 450, ready2rock wrote:

In post 427, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I think some three of the most non active people voting baltar shows that he is town

nah

Game is just over 24 hours old

In post 454, NoPowerOverMe wrote:So join me then.

In post 456, NoPowerOverMe wrote:So could you but I doubt it.

In post 457, Quick wrote:

In post 456, NoPowerOverMe wrote:So could you but I doubt it.

I'm never Scum with anyone except VP and possibly R2R?

In post 458, votato wrote:

In post 457, Quick wrote:

In post 456, NoPowerOverMe wrote:So could you but I doubt it.

I'm never Scum with anyone except VP and possibly R2R?

you should be scum with me

In post 257, NoPowerOverMe wrote:

In post 256, VP Baltar wrote:Any particular posts or moments where you feel that way?

Where she queestions her read of Blair.

In post 122, NoPowerOverMe wrote:

In post 118, Blair wrote:So I should have asked myself to spew town as well?

I'm not really following. (Also, THAT definitely would be asking for town cred)

You shouldn't "ask yourself to spew town", you should just do things that are pro town rather than go around looking for people that think you are town.

In post 153, votato wrote:

In post 135, NoPowerOverMe wrote:

In post 131, votato wrote:

In post 128, Atarashi Hajimari wrote:

In post 127, votato wrote:as someone else said, the important thing is that you thought you did.

Then can you answer my 117 and 119? Like, this whole wagon positioning argument is really weird.

first, if you want me to respond to posts other than the one you are currently making, be a lamb and use [post] tags.
second, neither of those posts are addressed to me. you want me to answer them?

NPOM's posts werent memorable at all. partly its probably the lack of avatar (a condition that will result in a scum-read if it persists), but it also suggests a lack of content or quality shitposting.

Where do you get off calling your posts being higher quality than mine?

@atarashi: no, i don't buy the wagon positioning argument. its kinda silly pre-flip. i just think that your defense of it is even worse, and does not do anything to defend your actions because your defense said "i didnt do x" when the argument was "you thought you did x." You either need to say "i didnt think i did x" or "x isnt bad". you said neither.

@NPOM: i said nothing about the quality of my posts. and i didnt say yours were particularly bad either. i just said i didnt remember. if you add an avatar youll be more memorable.

@quick: are you really gonna start deathtunneling me already? its a bit early for that, no? i hope you're gonna bring a different playstyle here.

In post 268, Quick wrote:

In post 253, NoPowerOverMe wrote:

NoPowerOverMe
CantLynchAPuppy
Quick
Nauci

VP Baltar
votato

Atarashi
Blair

not enough content: iDannyboy, Gammagooey, ready2rock, mavsfan, PeterPan

How do you group those two together?

In post 295, Nauci wrote:

In post 253, NoPowerOverMe wrote:

Quick

Blair

ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ y tho ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ

In post 337, mavsfan41 wrote:@Quick: most of my reasoning was how you plucked out a post from the past when justifying a vote vs voting at the time of the post. And now you just plucked my post haha.

@Puppy: you have a series of posts 229-231 that was the inception of the Votato interaction (231). Your 229 had a question posed to NPOM. I think the votato read only started cause votato responded first and that’s naturally where the conversation went. Since the 229 post, NPOM has gone quiet and hasn’t actually responded. Wouldn’t this be more suspicious and possibly be seen as NPOM letting another read develop while staying away? Basically what I’m saying is that I think town!votato is more likely to respond where scum would stay back and let something pass.

@NPOM: your Nauci read has developed quite a bit. It goes from RVS with a double down in 92. And still (what I believe is throwing shade) Nauci in 185 to having her as top town read in 253. In those 70 posts, what strikes you as town?

In post 168, Atarashi Hajimari wrote:Also @votato, respond to 157 already

In post 468, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I already said what strikes Nauci as town to me.

In post 468, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I already said what strikes Nauci as town to me.

In post 473, Nauci wrote:

In post 468, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I already said what strikes Nauci as town to me.

There are more parts to that post which you neglected