Mafiascum.net

about to go to a dnd game so wont be on much, have been session prepping for the past 2 hours ish but gun to my head

votato is scum and I read this game wrong

quick has been watching and not replying, showing an interest in the game but only has not chosen to type because he thought I didn't care. Anthony was noob town


@mod can you confirm that anthony has been replaced?

I think the lynch sequence is between


tl - nash - votato and that solves it. Could def be talking out of my ass but my gut is just hitting so hard on this

I've also been kind of baiting this as I feel like town votato would call out the faulty logic in the jk confirms you "ish" claim

In post 451, Mikul wrote:I think the lynch sequence is between


tl - nash - votato and that solves it. Could def be talking out of my ass but my gut is just hitting so hard on this

I would flip the order, but people have different reads.

Anthony has just basically not been here. How many posts do they have? I feel like VT might replace out.

I feel like Anthony was either over cautious Scum or just Newb Town. Not much else in their ISO, but they did make a good point about Arthur being Town:

In post 85, Anthony87 wrote:I'm hesitant to L-2 Arthur for only one reason (and if someone wants to show me why this is meaningless, then I have no problem voting), does him trying to make sure the vote against him is counted seem anti scum?

In post 444, Mikul wrote:@TL

Why are you willing to lynch in that order when you just posted this less than a day and a half ago?

199

Because I didn't put votato ahead of Anthony? Good point and I don't have a good reason for it, i'd kinda forgotten about that POE after thinking so much about the vote POE... hoorey, now let's wind up that Mikul confirmation bias even more...

My main point stands thought:

Anybody to the right of Brass would require some convincing, but there are absolutely scenarios where Anthony or votato or both are scum.

In post 428, LicketyQuickety wrote:I think it's pretty clear at least one of TL/votato is Scum. I think TL has made some posts that are hard(er) to fake as Scum, so that leaves me thinking votato is Scum. So Scum are in those three between TL/votato/nash. I really think the way votato dropped off means he's Scum since he doesn't actually have legit reasons for why I am Scum and can't defend that position.

excuse you? yes, me dropping off while on VLA is totally AI. i did defend why you're scum. i picked one game to link, but pretty much every game ive been with you was the same, except when you lurked in all your games and got replaced. but whenever youre active your playstyle is the same.

and quick why is anthony town to you?

In post 446, Mikul wrote:My senses are tingling so hard with this TL / Votato scum team


Votato is actively engaging in another game all day and has not defended himself vs quick. In that scenario TL would carry out the nk so the jk on votato likely did nothing

yeah i was active elsewhere today while there were no posts in this game, but i wasnt active else where while you all were posting. plus lurking isnt really in my scum meta, with one exception that involved a uniquely inactive game (more inactive than this game by far). i dont think id lurk again, even in that instance. it was my first scumgame. lurking just isnt AI for me.

In post 452, Mikul wrote:I've also been kind of baiting this as I feel like town votato would call out the faulty logic in the jk confirms you "ish" claim

i have called out the faulty logic, and i keep telling you it doesnt mechanically confirm me. at the same time, the more you trust me the better. its really nice for town when you falsely mechanically confirm a townie.

In post 454, LicketyQuickety wrote:Anthony has just basically not been here. How many posts do they have? I feel like VT might replace out.

PR hunting. this is a scum mindset

In post 455, LicketyQuickety wrote:I feel like Anthony was either over cautious Scum or just Newb Town. Not much else in their ISO, but they did make a good point about Arthur being Town:

In post 85, Anthony87 wrote:I'm hesitant to L-2 Arthur for only one reason (and if someone wants to show me why this is meaningless, then I have no problem voting), does him trying to make sure the vote against him is counted seem anti scum?

the best analysis quick can do, even after a flip is "town would be unlikely to say this non-gamesolving thing" quick is not town here.

After cogitating on the Brass replacement for a while I find it odd that he disappeared after he was asked for reads, a request which he would've seen (it was less than an hour after his last post).

To me, town would've acquiesced to the request - even if you aren't enjoying the game, it's a bit of a dick move to not do it. Conversely, there is massive scum motivation to not help out prior to bailing.

Then this post from his replacement.

In post 379, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm more or less caught up.

votato pushing Anthony is Scummy, but I am not sure votato wouldn't do that as Town.

I think this games solves with one more flip.

Going to:

VOTE: votato at this time.

The bit that bothers me is the confidence that the game will be solved tomorrow. This is some kind of crowd-pleasing effort that is utter BS - it can't possibly be genuine because it's simply not true. Especially not true since in the same post they put a vote on someone who is generally being read as town or null.

I'm getting to the same place as votato, but for different reasons.

Urgh. I just skimmed that thread you linked votato...

My logic about LQ doesn't stack up because they effectively said the exact same thing in D1 of that game. Just a weird confidence thing I guess... ignore my previous read...

You are very right about the completely different styles though. So different that it's hard to say it's super AI though.

In post 463, Town looter wrote:After cogitating on the Brass replacement for a while I find it odd that he disappeared after he was asked for reads, a request which he would've seen (it was less than an hour after his last post).

To me, town would've acquiesced to the request - even if you aren't enjoying the game, it's a bit of a dick move to not do it. Conversely, there is massive scum motivation to not help out prior to bailing.

Then this post from his replacement.

In post 379, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm more or less caught up.

votato pushing Anthony is Scummy, but I am not sure votato wouldn't do that as Town.

I think this games solves with one more flip.

Going to:

VOTE: votato at this time.

The bit that bothers me is the confidence that the game will be solved tomorrow. This is some kind of crowd-pleasing effort that is utter BS - it can't possibly be genuine because it's simply not true. Especially not true since in the same post they put a vote on someone who is generally being read as town or null.

I'm getting to the same place as votato, but for different reasons.

In post 461, votato wrote:

In post 454, LicketyQuickety wrote:Anthony has just basically not been here. How many posts do they have? I feel like VT might replace out.

PR hunting. this is a scum mindset

This is a bad misrep, vota. We have two claims already.

In post 463, Town looter wrote:After cogitating on the Brass replacement for a while I find it odd that he disappeared after he was asked for reads, a request which he would've seen (it was less than an hour after his last post).

To me, town would've acquiesced to the request - even if you aren't enjoying the game, it's a bit of a dick move to not do it. Conversely, there is massive scum motivation to not help out prior to bailing.

Then this post from his replacement.

In post 379, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm more or less caught up.

votato pushing Anthony is Scummy, but I am not sure votato wouldn't do that as Town.

I think this games solves with one more flip.

Going to:

VOTE: votato at this time.

The bit that bothers me is the confidence that the game will be solved tomorrow. This is some kind of crowd-pleasing effort that is utter BS - it can't possibly be genuine because it's simply not true. Especially not true since in the same post they put a vote on someone who is generally being read as town or null.

I'm getting to the same place as votato, but for different reasons.

Brass replaced out of all of his ongoing games. Even if that wasn't the case replacing out is NAI and I don't like how you're picking sides in the 1v1.

Brass is currently my strongest townread followed by votato (outside of the conftowns), and I'm not placing my vote there today.
LQ made a decent point about votato, but it isn't enough to override my view on that slot. Hope Anthony's replacement confirms before the deadline.

I will be on V/LA til the 5th. I'll be able to post a small amount from my phone here and there but the post will likely be of bad quality and riddled with spelling errors. I'll stay caught up but probably stick mostly to a few sentences. Ydrasse needs to make a convincing case for himself not to be lynched as he is my top candidate for now. I'm not so convinced town looter is scum except for my gut rubbing me the wrong way about him.

An extension would probably be good especially since people are gonna be vla for the weekend

ill post when i’m home.

In post 470, Ydrasse wrote:ill post when i’m home.

if there’s anything ppl want me to talk about immediately i’d appreciate the questions so i can get a footing here.

Don't mind me, I need the pagetop.

.