Mafiascum.net

In post 436, Replacement for Sujimichi wrote:or someone needing twice as many votes to be lynched.

14?

In post 414, Dunnstral wrote:As soon as I started calling certain people scum there was a perceptible shift in the way people started treating me

Want to point out your results?
And do you think those reactions were from scum? (because your call-outs were glorious)
Or is there perhaps a slight chance for reactions to be based on your posts being shaky?

In post 417, Dunnstral wrote:You and UnaB and it looks bad for you and neutral for UnaB

There's a notable lack of responding to things from Isis where I expect one

Hoopla's push on me is bad

So you had been questioned about this already. A decent assessment I'd say.
Why do you think notsciences reactions looked bad while mine only neutral?
Was it the actual content-matter provided, or just how you expect town!Una to react vs town!notscience to react?

That following notscience-Dunn -interaction is def. not S/S if you ask me.
From post 414 to 427.
Def. worth a look later as well.

Quick throwaway stream of consciousness before I have to focus on work.

Galron hopping off the gera-wagon at this time.
Perhaps because they really don't "feel it" anymore. Might be because of the notscience-Dunn -interaction?
Maybe because Hoopla DIDN'T want to leave the wagon?
Also noteworthy - didn't replace the vote yet with anything. Might need an existing wagon to join.

In contrast: Hoopla is unwilling to leave the wagon, and claims it's a hot one..!
I'd argue that it was stalled down right before reaching the L-1 and claim levels of temperature.
Again, could mean nothing. But could also be just scum!Hoopla wanting the claim..?

I'm thinking there's something here with the existing wagon.
Because if you look at the latest votecount, ALL OTHER VOTES are spread out.
Could this be an all-town wagon on a mislynch, and scum are trying to scatter and stay off?

yep, she's a beaut. so much town powering that wagon, you wouldn't know what to do with her. sad to see her go.

good job everyone, beautiful production!

UNVOTE:

VOTE: dunnstral

it's time

Hey not,

Scum on the leading wagons? Honestly on Gera's wagon my only town read in Una. Galron and Bob are both lacking in substantial town content, I feel very little about Popo and hoopla is confusing me - I listened to klick hype about hoop after their last game, but basically declaring a wagon of slots I see as on the scummy side of null, and the dedication to a quite weak wagon is odd.

Dun is also a scum-lean.

I've been asked about reading klick separately: in face to face I can tell he's scum from looking at him. In the last game we had healthy paranoia to each other - but slightly differently to how klick is portraying, especially at the end of day one we weren't communicating very well and this turned into his scum-reading me, but it got resolved. His drunk posting last night looked town , but his scum-reading of me super worries me, especially after all the theoretical chats we've had about playstyle. But it isn't day one unles si got low-key wagoneed at some point.

I think hoops asked me something else, coming up.

Oh, it was about the Gera wagon. It's ass because l don't see much reason to scum read him (and a flurry of votes seemed to come after bon referenced his meta, which is questionable), I can't see much good reason for most people's positioning on the wagon and also as I've said, my reads on the wagon are not town filled.

Still catching up, getting tipsy made me sleepy, not posty

....drunk klick looks a lot more town than sober klick and I agree with a lot of what he's saying. Ugh.

Bellaphant moving me to a scumlean there means she is scum.

It's pretty much exactly what I expected for her to do if she was scum. Let's kill her.

In post 460, Bellaphant wrote:....drunk klick looks a lot more town than sober klick and I agree with a lot of what he's saying. Ugh.

please give me a detailed analysis of klick's drinking persona, so i can read said posts through the correct lens.

what kind of drunk is he?

giggly and playful? depressive? philosophical? reckless?

Bad interactions between Bellaphant and Notscience as well

Is Klick a cuddledrunk?

As a meta read of Dunn I'd judge him town from what he's posted thus far fwiw, whereas blind to username I would scumbin the account with everyone else.

It's not something where I'm going to filibuster at E1 though.

personally, i am high on life 24/7

but i have a lot of field expertise with alcohol vis à vis using it as a truth serum.

you'd never believe the sordid confessions, and juicy secrets people have revealed to me over the years.

perhaps i attract them or draw them into me, but i suspect it's simply that i have a safe enough presence that allows people to bare all.

In post 467, Hoopla wrote:i suspect it's simply that i have a safe enough presence that allows people to bare all.

Is this the user whose posts I skimmed for two years so I could scroll wheel down and get the avatar with so much blood offscreen quicker?

those were the days

I remember playing with dun years back when I (and he) were fairly new and being impressed, so I guess I'm also reading the slot through 'this isn't what I expect'.

Klick is a cuddle sober, tbf. He's generally happy and giggly drunk, but I'm wondering if the wine got him out of his head enough to post more naturally.

In post 470, Bellaphant wrote:I remember playing with dun years back when I (and he) were fairly new and being impressed, so I guess I'm also reading the slot through 'this isn't what I expect'.

Klick is a cuddle sober, tbf. He's generally happy and giggly drunk, but I'm wondering if the wine got him out of his head enough to post more naturally.

does the fact that his tone changed to a more natural state when drunk suggest he is perhaps repressing something while sober...

perhaps some horrible secret.

...

perhaps some sick, twisted agenda?

See I did wonder that but it feels a bit tinhat? I think his confidence to disagree with you while tipsy felt more natural and I quite liked him drunkly town-binning not sci.

In post 374, Hoopla wrote:

In post 373, geraintm wrote:This is awkward hoopla. The post you think gives him town cred.for, I thought was bobbins....

why was it bobbins?

well, first explain to me what bobbins is, because i like this word and want to steal it for future use.

then explain why it was bobbins.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bobbins

Just a British phrase meaning something is pants
I think a bobbin is something to do with sewing, but It is just a way of saying something isn't much good.

I said in my post 87 that I thought popopo was clutching at straws with their post. I thought they were, for a post in the 1st 100, reading way too much into nothing. I hate people making grand statements about the game Day 1, because you just don't have the info. so that was why I thought it was a bad post. and then youcame along and said it was a good post!

In post 379, Hoopla wrote:
more likely, it was scum-pushed.

was I one of the people pushing the wagon on Bob?