Mafiascum.net

their = inactives

In post 445, NoPowerOverMe wrote:She got elimed as scum in the game I played with her

In post 372, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Mafia isn't about being nice it's about finding scum.

In post 72, NoPowerOverMe wrote:The roled are random so a vanilla majority is not guaranteed.

In post 71, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Wait no. The watcher has to watch the person being killed. Tracker could get two results though if I am thinking about it correctly.

In post 20, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Echo has a history of getting lynched day 1. I wouldn't recommend it.

Just seeing a lot of low-calorie posting from you that doesn’t mean anything.

In post 450, EchoVision wrote:their = inactives

So diplomatic

3 of those are in the first 100 posts... do you expect game solves in their place?

Of course not. I still believe the gravedigger claim. But I’m exploring nonetheless.

In post 440, Rannygazoo wrote:something

something

What the literal heck are you doing? Are you jesting? Is jester in this role list?

VOTE: Titus

In post 455, Titus wrote:

In post 440, Rannygazoo wrote:something

something

hahahaahaaa

In post 456, Rannygazoo wrote:What the literal heck are you doing? Are you jesting? Is jester in this role list?

VOTE: Titus

Something

In post 430, Rannygazoo wrote:I wasn’t being serious about a policy elim on shelly. I was just remarking that she seems lucky in rolling scum frequently, and then going on to win.

Not a real reason for a day 1 elim, but definitely something to be cautious about if you end up townreading her.

how much u roll scum is not in ur control therefore its a terrible thing to base any argument off of.

In post 434, redcardinal wrote:why mention her being a good policy elim then if you're not serious? rolling scum often has zero bearing on being scummy, you seem to be copying noraa without understanding the core of her argument

I do like this post. Matches my thoughts exactly.

In post 435, redcardinal wrote:also yikes, rereading that one post I did come off pretty aggressive. I meant that to be more casually sarcastic than rude. I do think that overexplaining is good for town though.

In post 436, redcardinal wrote:and on that same note, I don't like titus just jumping right on there with no explanation

For the above two posts, red cardinal is in my TRs. I like the attitude-its very towny and I believe you believe explaining is good.

In post 446, Rannygazoo wrote:That doesn’t mean anything. You can get elimmed in a way that sets up your team to win.

@NPOM do you post fluff in every game?

I dont see the point in bringing a lot of attention a conftown slot(at least rn they are conftown)?

In post 459, Noraa wrote:how much u roll scum is not in ur control therefore its a terrible thing to base any argument off of.

I was talking about how often she wins as scum, not how often the rolls scum. Please don’t misrepresent me like this.

In post 459, Noraa wrote:I dont see the point in bringing a lot of attention a conftown slot(at least rn they are conftown)?

Garbage opinion. No one is conftown.

In post 460, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 459, Noraa wrote:how much u roll scum is not in ur control therefore its a terrible thing to base any argument off of.

I was talking about how often she wins as scum, not how often the rolls scum. Please don’t misrepresent me like this.

we should not have a bias even if she wins more as scum. otherwise out subconscious will eventually basically start thinking wining as scum a lot = is scum a lot.

In post 461, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 459, Noraa wrote:I dont see the point in bringing a lot of attention a conftown slot(at least rn they are conftown)?

Garbage opinion. No one is conftown.

they are basically conftown rn and there's no point in doing anything to that slot unless proven otherwise

In post 461, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 459, Noraa wrote:I dont see the point in bringing a lot of attention a conftown slot(at least rn they are conftown)?

Garbage opinion. No one is conftown.

idk my rolepm says town so I guess I'm in the clear

seriously though I think you're missing the point on purpose. npom is not a good slot to be throwing shade on, pick someone else

I've been accused of having short posts but I think that's a good thing and not a bad thing.

In post 463, redcardinal wrote:

In post 461, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 459, Noraa wrote:I dont see the point in bringing a lot of attention a conftown slot(at least rn they are conftown)?

Garbage opinion. No one is conftown.

idk my rolepm says town so I guess I'm in the clear

seriously though I think you're missing the point on purpose. npom is not a good slot to be throwing shade on, pick someone else

This is a strange post. I explore suspicious activity where I see it. I don’t decide who I’m going to accuse first and then come up with reasons later.-

In post 464, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I've been accused of having short posts but I think that's a good thing and not a bad thing.

why is it a good thing? im not interested in engaging u too much but im curious

I don't shit around.

aha im the opposite. but I suppose having long posts doesnt necessarily mean they "shit around"

In my opinion people aren't as likely to read a long post and it's harder to figure out what your intention is sometimes.

the people won't read it part is very accurate.
intention yeah I could see why.

In post 464, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I've been accused of having short posts but I think that's a good thing and not a bad thing.

Just a side question, why? I think the only faction with a motivation to post short and sparse is scum because it gives town less to read them off of.

In post 469, NoPowerOverMe wrote:In my opinion people aren't as likely to read a long post and it's harder to figure out what your intention is sometimes.

that makes sense if you presuppose that the other townies aren't trying, which given that this is a forum and not town of salem or among us or something I've come to expect at least the effort of reading the game

anyways npom I don't really have a reason to ask you anything relevant to the game since you're voting rannygazoo so thanks

reds sudden switch to ranny is pretty anti-opportunistic if hertas red just as i thought

In post 443, redcardinal wrote:Their 1v1 reads as town v town to me, I don't think scum explains good versus bad play as politely or correctly as shelly did to noraa, and I'm back to townreading noraa based on her reaction to my proposal for a townblock.

meh explaining play is NAI of itself so a slightly streated reason to get TR'd

In post 445, NoPowerOverMe wrote:She got elimed as scum in the game I played with her

i was guiltied