Page 19 of 183

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:06 pm
by lilith2013
oh

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:07 pm
by lilith2013
In post 447, Infinity 324 wrote:
In post 445, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 443, Infinity 324 wrote:It's 2 minutes, maybe I'm reading too much into this?
You're definitely reading too much into it
Ok I believe you, vote stays
Why?

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:08 pm
by Infinity 324
In post 451, lilith2013 wrote: Why?
In post 433, Infinity 324 wrote:I find scum more likely to say "I may be bad but not scum" since people don't like to admit they're wrong. "feels a little off" is way down in confidence from where you were just a second ago too.
This reasoning still applies, I think tgp is trying to get read as "bad town"

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:11 pm
by lilith2013
In post 433, Infinity 324 wrote:I find scum more likely to say "I may be bad but not scum" since people don't like to admit they're wrong. "feels a little off" is way down in confidence from where you were just a second ago too.
can you explain where he said "I may be bad but not scum"? and also what makes you think the second post is less confident than the first post? I'm reading them as the opposite.

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:13 pm
by the worst
vote count 1.15


JacksonVirgo (3)
: lilith2013, petapan, Hoopla
lilith2013 (3)
: PenguinPower, skitter30, Uncrowned
TheGoldenParadox (2)
: Infinity 324, davesaz
Uncrowned (1)
: DrippingGoofball
skitter30 (1)
: Dunnstral
PenguinPower (1)
: TheGoldenParadox

Not voting
: Something_Smart, Pine, JacksonVirgo

Deadline: (expired on 2020-11-02 21:15:00)


mod notes
:
- skitter30 v/la Fridays & Saturdays
- quack

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:14 pm
by Infinity 324
In post 422, TheGoldenParadox wrote: penguin you can call my takes bad but calling me scum for them is a terrible take yourself
This is not quite "I may be bad but I'm not scum" but it's close enough. "Feels a little off" is something you'd use to describe a post from someone you were otherwise townreading, not a hard scumread usually.

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:14 pm
by TheGoldenParadox
quack? duckie we're nowhere CLOSE to a pagetop

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:14 pm
by TheGoldenParadox
oh lmao i'm stupid ~

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:15 pm
by davesaz
In post 446, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 444, davesaz wrote:In the last 4 pages, 1 of which appeared while I was reading, I think TGP looks like scum.
VOTE: TGP
Talk about it a little bit?
In post 448, skitter30 wrote:Oh i also have some scumping on dave, i forgot to say that
I think Dunn's response looks better than skitter's.

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:16 pm
by the worst
i quack when i please.

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:17 pm
by Something_Smart
TGP:
In post 442, Something_Smart wrote:
In post 413, TheGoldenParadox wrote:sorry, let me rephrase this with some more clarity. basically, i think JV's wagon began with town (lillith and petapan) and i think hoopla is scum that jumped on it. because hoopla put a vote down there, it makes me townlean on JV.
Why was Hoopla's vote jump scummy?

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:19 pm
by lilith2013
skitter, why do you think SS is towny?

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:19 pm
by skitter30
In post 449, lilith2013 wrote:@skitter what did you not like about my vote on JV?

what information do you expect to get from a wagon that interacting with me wouldn't give?
I actually dont have much thoughts on your jv vote!
Or more accurately, the jv vote by itself is fine and i dont have an opinion on it, but the lack of contributing real content (i.e. in that you only made an rvs vote) at a stage of the game where there was actually real things to talk about felt kinda scummy from you

Idk if i'm necessarily expecting a particular bit of information from wagoning you, so much as it was a: 'i'm trying to get your attention and lets see what you'll do next!' type vote
Also i'm like soulreading you as scum off your entrance so decided to vote you till i got more to work with, which would hopefully be prompted by being voted

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:20 pm
by skitter30
In post 458, davesaz wrote:I think Dunn's response looks better than skitter's.
That's fine!

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:21 pm
by skitter30
In post 461, lilith2013 wrote:skitter, why do you think SS is towny?
Feels a bit more invested/involved than i think scum!him would be

I am really sad to say that i think you rolled scum this game :(

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:25 pm
by skitter30
It's even worse in that there's next to no way i'm getting you voted out today, probably

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:26 pm
by davesaz
In post 370, TheGoldenParadox wrote:how are we at 15 pages
i swear
i didn't get the daystart pm that long ago

the entire lilith wagon feels manufactured and VOTE: penguinpower is pinging me especially hard, as is hoopla for what boils down to opportunistic wagon hopping.
Starts off highly apologetic. Why such emphasis?
In post 394, TheGoldenParadox wrote:i think JV is town, because it seems like their wagon started as a town-driven CW to lillith before hoopla jumped onto it.
This early in the game I don't think that thinking of wagons as CWs is a town oriented mindset. In the town mindset it's a CW if and only if you suspect the target of the 1st wagon. In the early game we have multiple wagons which are on unknown alignments and we don't know whether the 2nd one is in response to the 1st one unless it's either stated directly as such or if there are signs that it's competitive.
In post 413, TheGoldenParadox wrote:
In post 394, TheGoldenParadox wrote:i think JV is town, because it seems like their wagon started as a town-driven CW to lillith before hoopla jumped onto it.
sorry, let me rephrase this with some more clarity. basically, i think JV's wagon began with town (lillith and petapan) and i think hoopla is scum that jumped on it. because hoopla put a vote down there, it makes me townlean on JV.
Indirectly scumreading Hoopla but nowhere in this ISO is it made clear why Hoopla would be a scumread.
In post 422, TheGoldenParadox wrote:jackson wagon was hot and new
lillith wagon was an rvs wagon based essentially solely on the fact that they were first in the PL

penguin
you can call my takes bad but calling me scum for them is a terrible take
yourself
This is indicative of scum caught for the wrong reason. Though it is pretty weak for that tell coming from someone who hasn't really been under heavy suspicion. I'm not the only one who thought this.
In post 432, TheGoldenParadox wrote:apologies town driven cw is probably the worst way i could have worded it ever

a new wagon started by town that scum!hoopla jumped on
Again with the apologies. I don't think I have played with TGP enough times to be able to say for certain, but this is pretty early in the game to be so worried about how one's posting looks and it seems perhaps out of character.

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:27 pm
by petapan
In post 466, davesaz wrote:Indirectly scumreading Hoopla but nowhere in this ISO is it made clear why Hoopla would be a scumread.
it's in his first post? "opportunistic wagon hopping". strong noob vibes.

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:29 pm
by lilith2013
In post 462, skitter30 wrote:
In post 449, lilith2013 wrote:@skitter what did you not like about my vote on JV?

what information do you expect to get from a wagon that interacting with me wouldn't give?
I actually dont have much thoughts on your jv vote!
Or more accurately, the jv vote by itself is fine and i dont have an opinion on it, but the lack of contributing real content (i.e. in that you only made an rvs vote) at a stage of the game where there was actually real things to talk about felt kinda scummy from you

Idk if i'm necessarily expecting a particular bit of information from wagoning you, so much as it was a: 'i'm trying to get your attention and lets see what you'll do next!' type vote
Also i'm like soulreading you as scum off your entrance so decided to vote you till i got more to work with, which would hopefully be prompted by being voted
So you think that voting me while I'm away is going to make me come back and produce content?

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:30 pm
by TheGoldenParadox
In post 460, Something_Smart wrote:TGP:
In post 442, Something_Smart wrote:
In post 413, TheGoldenParadox wrote:sorry, let me rephrase this with some more clarity. basically, i think JV's wagon began with town (lillith and petapan) and i think hoopla is scum that jumped on it. because hoopla put a vote down there, it makes me townlean on JV.
Why was Hoopla's vote jump scummy?
It wasn't directly that scummy (outside of the fact that i believe wagon hopping like that is inherently slightly more likely to come from scum trying to find a miselimination to join) but i was pinged by the subsequent Penguin interaction with that.

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:30 pm
by davesaz
In post 467, petapan wrote:
In post 466, davesaz wrote:Indirectly scumreading Hoopla but nowhere in this ISO is it made clear why Hoopla would be a scumread.
it's in his first post? "opportunistic wagon hopping". strong noob vibes.
Eh, fair enough. I'm used to much more though it is extremely early still.
I'm certain TGP has been in enough games to not be considered in that category. I'm just not sure I have a strong meta handle yet.

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:30 pm
by lilith2013
In post 464, skitter30 wrote:
In post 461, lilith2013 wrote:skitter, why do you think SS is towny?
Feels a bit more invested/involved than i think scum!him would be

I am really sad to say that i think you rolled scum this game :(
I don't have any townpings from SS from so far, which... based on my read meter for him, means he's probably scum.

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:32 pm
by skitter30
It was an attempt at telepathic communication inducing you to return

More seriously tho it obviously wouldnt make you come back, but would give me a way to read you once you did

@lilith

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:33 pm
by skitter30
In post 434, skitter30 wrote:Ok how do you get from that thought to 'this is town-indicative for jv'
So it doesnt get lost in the shuffle ^

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:34 pm
by the worst
quack