Mafiascum.net

Everytime Shelly posts, I feel like they're pocketing me now.

In post 450, Flavor Leaf wrote:Everytime Shelly posts, I feel like they're pocketing me now.

don't worry it's comfy

In post 449, unwnd wrote:I think you're overreacting to light pressure and you may be a type of player who wants to lecture but not vice-versa lol

i do very bad against pressure as either alignment.

I'm pretty sure andres can back that up.

anyways can you read my *bullet points* and respond if you like people pushing that way

I think I would prefer if Andres could tell me what that means himself before I determine how I feel about it

However, I will ask you why you are associating me+johnny+nopoint? That team just doesn't make sense at all. You'd have to think me/Nopoint are scum theatering and then Johnny is trying to seem disengaged while affronting a town-read on me based on style alone

In post 363, nopointinactingup wrote:I find the way johnny plays as scum is lurking and opportunism and I got a sense of it in his recent posts.

In post 364, PlusJOYED wrote:johny nullscum trying too hard to start stuff

Lol #takes

In post 453, unwnd wrote:However, I will ask you why you are associating me+johnny+nopoint? That team just doesn't make sense at all. You'd have to think me/Nopoint are scum theatering and then Johnny is trying to seem disengaged while affronting a town-read on me based on style alone

i said its a very rudimentary solve because it doesn't quite work associatively

but I can totally see you/nopoint as a team. the lack of further engagement after the initial push is notable.

there's a vote on nopoint but you quickly switch to FL once he does his eyecatching selfvote

In post 454, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Lol #takes

Sorry these are just funny to me cuz they're literally back to back

I don't even think I could call it scum theater frankly, Nopoint told me that my reasons didn't make sense and that was a bit of a blow to me personally cause I try my absolute hardest to make sure my points are clear and concise. I said it before a bit earlier and I'll say it again: I tend to bullshit a bit of my reads in order to garner reactions, creating heightened accusations in order to see what make people tick. The action itself of calling out Nopoint in that matter was much more important than anything else, and I got a reaction out of it which is what my intent was in the first place.

You just did the same thing (:

I read Johnny as coming from an "attention span of a puppy dog" kinda way here

In post 458, unwnd wrote:I don't even think I could call it scum theater frankly, Nopoint told me that my reasons didn't make sense and that was a bit of a blow to me personally cause I try my absolute hardest to make sure my points are clear and concise. I said it before a bit earlier and I'll say it again: I tend to bullshit a bit of my reads in order to garner reactions, creating heightened accusations in order to see what make people tick. The action itself of calling out Nopoint in that matter was much more important than anything else, and I got a reaction out of it which is what my intent was in the first place.

You just did the same thing (:

your vote was a "reaction vote"?

why do you care about how clear you are moreso than a lot of things?

do you scumread nopoint?

In post 410, JohnnyFarrar wrote:So at the tail end of page 11 is this impenetrable conversation between andres and unwnd that I just can't read into at all. Every time I try I end up putting my phone down.

This actually made me laugh. It’s really great shade.

In post 458, unwnd wrote:You just did the same thing (:

wdym?

I voted FL before the selfvote etc

I then voted you. From a hypothetical town!you pov we are not scum theatreing

What do you think looks more daunting for scum

1. A naked blank vote with no reasoning attached at all
2. An effective summary of why you are voting someone and then proceeding to do so

In post 462, shellyc wrote:

In post 458, unwnd wrote:You just did the same thing (:

wdym?

I voted FL before the selfvote etc

I then voted you. From a hypothetical town!you pov we are not scum theatreing

You gave me a reaction

As in

Right now

It's what I wanted

this seems a really convoluted way of scumhunting in that you scumhunt by apparently making fake reads and finding reactions?

In post 463, unwnd wrote:What do you think looks more daunting for scum

1. A naked blank vote with no reasoning attached at all
2. An effective summary of why you are voting someone and then proceeding to do so

the naked vote

its fine to naked vote

especially a naked vote on scum in which scum don't know why they were scumread

In post 459, Flavor Leaf wrote:I read Johnny as coming from an "attention span of a puppy dog" kinda way here

Sorry bouncing back and forth between catching up and what's currently happening because I wanna wrap my head around this game

In post 465, shellyc wrote:this seems a really convoluted way of scumhunting in that you scumhunt by apparently making fake reads and finding reactions?

They're not fake, they're just excessive. I let my mind wander a bit and start going through the motions of what an action could mean and just put it all out there, especially on D1.

Make no mistake, I was not just haha fake-accusing Nopoint for laughs, I was very much (pinged) by him and then I just went through the process of coming up with a bunch of reasons as to why I felt that way. I don't simply believe in my bullshit and then hand it to people, I very much think that Nopoint's way of accusing dunn was scummy, but then the further interaction got ruined when

He literally just said 'i dont understand' lol

do you, of this day, still scumread nopoint?

In post 467, shellyc wrote:especially a naked vote on scum in which scum don't know why they were scumread

Why so they can just ignore you? Give them reasons to squirm and feel uncomfortable. One vote isn't gonna do shit

I dont want to know your methodology of scumreading, I want to know what your actual takes are