Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2020 11:02 am
Wishful thinking it remainsIn post 447, Gypyx wrote:Nah i'll blow the test early it's not real, sorry y'all
I typed that before I read
I typed that before I read
Wishful thinking it remainsIn post 447, Gypyx wrote:Nah i'll blow the test early it's not real, sorry y'all
This pinged.In post 163, pisskop wrote:oh boy. Yea lets just powerlynch something and move on. Narrow down our suspect pool before we sort everyone.
This is dangerous because scum could intentionally no kill for this purpose.In post 357, Gypyx wrote:Also, we don't necessarly *need* to get out all of the scum of a thread by n2, like, if we do it by n3 there will be a nokill which is a pretty clear sign?
It’s Tammy!In post 459, Spiffeh wrote:hi Nacho!
I have already explained my town read on shelly in 393
Anything you want to know specifically?
I like her indignation a bit, but where do you think she’s stream-of-conscious to where it’s not fakable? Could this not be a natural writing style?In post 392, Spiffeh wrote:I don't really get why shelly is being scum read though?
I thought her posting was very stream-of-conscious which I think is hard for newer players to fake as scum (looking at join date to qualify her as as newer player)
And t's reasonable to be put off by Bell's overconfidence and her conviction there looks pretty town too
ONE COOKIE ONE SCUM DOESNT ALWAYS WORK BELL!In post 397, Bell wrote:I just can't fucking sleep.In post 392, Spiffeh wrote:I don't really get why shelly is being scum read though?
I thought her posting was very stream-of-conscious which I think is hard for newer players to fake as scum (looking at join date to qualify her as as newer player)
And t's reasonable to be put off by Bell's overconfidence and her conviction there looks pretty town too
Look I just know Shellyc is almost certainly scum this game because big book of shellyc scum meta.
If it's bullshit and I'm wrong I'm super sorry.
I genuinely, easily could make a good case on them to the point that it's just too easy. I am brimming with thoughts.
Bursting with enthusiasm.
Think of this as a freebie
You get one town bell and one scum.
Get Shellyc. If I must scum case them hard I will do so.
But I will hate you, I will hate all of you.
When I say "stream-of-consciousness" I was referring to the string of posts 214, 219, 221, 228, and 229, etc.In post 432, zMuffinMan wrote:"stream of consciousness" is prob the last phrase id use to describe shellyc
she clearly had a preconceived notion of how she thinks bell plays
It all could be fake-able but I don't feel that wayIn post 462, Imperium wrote:I like her indignation a bit, but where do you think she’s stream-of-conscious to where it’s not fakable? Could this not be a natural writing style?
Wrong. 90% sure.In post 459, Spiffeh wrote:hi Nacho!
I have already explained my town read on shelly in 393
Anything you want to know specifically?
It's serious, she could be town though, I'm no scum hunting God.In post 457, Imperium wrote:Hi titus!
Yeah bell if your scum read on Shelly is serious, please give reasons if not a whole case.
This seemed like kind of a weird take because it felt like to me that about three people kinda independently came in with similar concepts and then discussion ensued. Sirius was the first to sort of but wasn't fleshed out at all. Pooky kinda pinged me at first because he came in with the idea all written out like it was the first time it'd been said, but in fairness he could have been typing it up and didn't read along before he posted it.In post 424, unwnd wrote:In post 550, Dandelion Wine wrote:In post 420, unwnd wrote:In post 544, Dandelion Wine wrote:Town. There's a thing town tammy does that I don't think she can yet replicate, but this would be the game to prove me wrong. As for nacho....I misread him last game but like, I'm not gonna let that stop me from thinking he's townier than rand here, either.Right now most of us over here think you have more scum over there. Do you agree with this consensus? I have seated paranoia especially in light of this, where I feel like one of the players you would feel comfort in have potential to be scum. There's nothing exactly there to like, fully develop a case on though. That isn't my intention either. A case in the sense I would have more to talk about in terms of what they're posting. The feelings I get is certain things I'm unable to put into decent words right now.I guess we can get into mech thoughts, if you'd like. I think that anything other than 3-3 would be suboptimal wifom ploy. I think that the most likely distribution is 3-3.I think at least one person pushing the "yeet scumreads into the reverse timeline" thread is scum.No I don't know which one. I think that if at any point we have two dead scum in your thread and the game is still going without a bunch of ya'll being ICs, that we should straight up murder anyone alive who suggested the plan.
Oh I 10000% agree with the bolded. I thought people were clinging on too quickly to [redacted]'s idea and then they just started to roll with it due how weaker he was in general. I find that's a common tactic for scum to latch onto the ideas of those players because if it goes wrong they can inevitably blame them. Pooky pinged the shit out of me and then fucked off since, that would be my guess for over here. I think good players would choose 3-3 and then underdogs/people who cling to meta to be townread (cough cough shelly) would want to be in a thread with people who they could trick easily. I'm fine with believing it's 3-3 just so I don't get cocky.