Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2021 7:13 pm
i feel like im pocketed this game and it makes me uneasy
I'm not satisfied with this whatsoever. It's not just that you're not calling anyone scum, but it's that you lack the scum hunting/town hunting effort that I see you have in the town games of yours that I've looked at. When you are town you poke and prod around, analyzing gameplay, coming to conclusions with reasoning. Even when you have gut reads you have some specific post to cite as to why. This isn't your town game.In post 445, ItalianoVD wrote:I have my reads the way I do because I do, just like everyone else has their reads.
Something just seems a bit off about you Baltar, I can’t pinpoint it. Interactions and posts, etc. I can say the same thing about Lotus and Lunar. Although Midwaybear has seemed pretty townie so far.
I really really don't like this post, even aside from his sudden/shallow progression from Duchess scum to GC scum. You say that you are okay with an elim on anyone from your lim pool, which ok that's not scummy in itself. But, it's as if you are already giving up on trying to solve people. There are so many alignments up in the air and you yourself don't have anything solid on anyone. This is such an awkward time to settle on shooting inside your poe.In post 415, ItalianoVD wrote:I’ve reread the gameIn post 379, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:italiano who would you vote for if you had to vote somewhere?
Limpool {RLotus, Lunar, Green Crayons, Baltar}
Townleaning {RTP, Andres, Duchess??)
Everyone else is pretty null
So what I did irt to the Green/Duchess interaction is I read both sides as different alignments and Duchess was the most likely town between the two. In a t/s connection I couldn’t see Duchess as scum and Green as town. It could be a t/t connection, but after rereading the interaction multiple times, I feel like Duchess was more pure than Green was, so would town . It also isn’t that likely it’s a s/s bus connection on Day 1, so...
VOTE: Green Crayons
Although I’d be okay with anyone within my limpool.
what is the "(bolded)" referring to here?In post 440, ItalianoVD wrote:Aww my bad you’re right. I meant to post this (bolded) in 435. This is what I had in my notes, just for got to include it in the original post. That’s why I thought I answered it.In post 436, VP Baltar wrote:Where? Am I missing something?
Okay? I never said you were def scum, just in my limpool. It just means that I’m more comfortable eliminating within my limpool than the players in the other categories.In post 417, VP Baltar wrote:I thought I was a reaction test for you, Italiano? I'm def scum now?
rtp, i don't want to be chasing after you the whole game, but like, this is getting tiring. is there a concrete reason you're ignoring me?In post 431, Datisi wrote:@rtp do you mind elaborating on what universes you're keeping track of and why you feel andres is scum? also i spent like 10 minutes typing up the italiano thing :c
alright, i can vibe with that.In post 438, Green Crayons wrote:palate cleanser. felt getting sucked into a duchess vortex and wanted to break my vote away to force my attention away.In post 413, Datisi wrote:talk to me about your vote on dunn?
Baltar had just mentioned something about Dunn acting like lurker scum from prior scum game, which is a good enough to vote for me rn bc 1. voting lurkers is good for the soul, 2. Baltar pings me town, 3. i assume the meta analysis isn't wrong otherwise Dunn would say so, and 4. it wasn't Duchess.
Why did you feel compelled to answer for Italiano here?In post 432, midwaybear wrote:I mean this is probably just a POE thing.
I'm going to revisit Duchess, probably IRL tomorrow.In post 458, Datisi wrote:do you have anyone that actively pings you scum? (other than maybe duchess, i guess.)
to clarify: I don't think either has pushed the game forward.In post 462, Green Crayons wrote:it feels like they have contributed the same in terms of pushing the game forward
after being called out by Baltar, it was like pulling teeth to get him to engage and provide any sort of content. tbh not entirely sure which way that cuts in terms of alignment, setting aside whatever meta argument about Dunn and activity levels, but it certainly isn't pro-town even if it doesn't qualify as scum, so atm I'm happy to keep my vote hereIn post 458, Datisi wrote:i've seen dunn lurk as either alignment, but he definitely hasn't impressed so far.
Who are your townreads?In post 462, Green Crayons wrote:I'm going to revisit Duchess, probably IRL tomorrow.In post 458, Datisi wrote:do you have anyone that actively pings you scum? (other than maybe duchess, i guess.)
I'm getting scum pings from RTP and Harumi. Not sure if they are tied together, but they have both repeatedly ignored my direct inquiries; even though they have starkly different activity levels, it feels like they have contributed the same in terms of pushing the game forward; and RTP's preemptive claim of a secret town tell for Harumi doesn't sit right with me (particularly bc he refuses to engage on it).
In post 342, Green Crayons wrote:In post 328, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:i honestly do not feel i will be much trusting harumi for reads rather than just a town mindset - but the tell I had noticed was they were clueless. Like overtly clueless. With newer/not as skilled/assertive players, coming off as brazenly clueless is a towntell.In post 325, Duchess wrote:RTP, what do you think of Harumi's readslist? And are you able to share what your towntell was about earlier?In post 287, Green Crayons wrote:If RTP is going to reveal his town tell for Harumi, can he also explain his thinking behind revealing the existence of a Top Secret reason to think she was town (which would seem to discourage additional votes on Harumi), but not revealing what that reason was because he wanted to see if the wagon would build:
ignoring direct inquiries means not having to explain your actions/readsIn post 466, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:And whats scummy about the actions youve stated, i.e. whats the scum motivation?
......In post 470, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:I already revealed it.
I'll quote it when im not at work
But discred me more will ya?
I think imma do trustfalls when i get home and analyze isos
Can you identify which posts of mine are not attempting to push the game forward?In post 471, Green Crayons wrote:ignoring direct inquiries means not having to explain your actions/readsIn post 466, Reformed Toxic Player wrote:And whats scummy about the actions youve stated, i.e. whats the scum motivation?
not pushing game forward means not potentially taking heat by pushing town vote, like lurker or active lurker status
your town tell with Harumi tbd I want to hear your response first