Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 2:01 pm
VOTE: Andante
what makes you say thatIn post 451, PawnsGambit wrote:You know there is likely 3 scum and not 5 right?
In post 449, Robert M Hunter wrote:When I read this, my mind immediately jumped to the possibility ofIn post 362, Andante wrote:Serious question though, why is Osuka trying to control the game?Andante-scum being salty about osuka controlling the game. My scum read on this player slot remains unchanged.
your scumread of andante hinges on osuka being town, but for the second time you fail to provide any backup for why you actually believe the latter to be true. "being funny, generally" is NAI. admitting (jokingly or otherwise) to getting ATE'd and not doing any actual player analysis outside of that is questionable.In post 449, Robert M Hunter wrote: I am so entertained byosuka's posts that I would resist voting him even if he confessed.
this strikes me as rather flimsy reasoning. he doubles down, sure, but refuses to engage with questions directed at him or back up his reasoning with anything concrete. it reads to me like scum wanting to look confident but scared to overcommit.In post 449, Robert M Hunter wrote: Surprise, I'm (cautiously still) movingPawnout of the litter box into the kitten drawer. I see a whole lot of attention-grabbing terrible logic and cornered animal lashing out. His bad pushes get backlash but he doubles down like a townie instead of letting go like a good little scum.
struggling to decipher thisIn post 449, Robert M Hunter wrote:Salsabil Faria.I have formed an opinion on this player slot but it could be the kind of reason that will get me modkilled.
interesting, considering you never so much as mentioned his name in either post outside of the "kittens" list itself. the initial townread stems from 2 posts of VFP's: a random vote for osuka (one of the first posts in the thread) and a post asking if they were conftown yet. what evidence do you have which suggests to you that VFP is town?
touché. looks like most are 3-scum, a couple had 2 or 4 and none had 5. i still don't see readlist distribution not matching likely actual distribution as much of a problem this early thoughIn post 453, PawnsGambit wrote:Look at the number of scum in the last 10 mini normal 13 player games.
Number of scum reads > Actual number of scumIn post 451, PawnsGambit wrote:You know there is likely 3 scum and not 5 right?
okay let's assume for a second pawns and i are scum buddiesIn post 408, VFP wrote:I'm going to focus here tomorrow with some read updates.
PawnsGambit deserves some pressure here.
Out right refusing to discuss reads and now just ignoring posts to them.
Adding nothing and apparently getting away with doing so?
VOTE: PawnsGambit
New player trying to stay close and call their scum buddy Osuka town the whole time, following in the footsteps, or just trying to buddy to a town Osuka thinking this will protect them?
Regardless attention should be here.
how would he? only thing i can think of is if he's scumIn post 410, Robert M Hunter wrote:Do you know that osuka is town, by any chance? If so, please let us all know, this would be very useful information.In post 408, VFP wrote:I'm going to focus here tomorrow with some read updates.
PawnsGambit deserves some pressure here.
Out right refusing to discuss reads and now just ignoring posts to them.
Adding nothing and apparently getting away with doing so?
VOTE: PawnsGambit
New player trying to stay close and call their scum buddy Osuka town the whole time, following in the footsteps, or just trying to buddy to a town Osuka thinking this will protect them?
Regardless attention should be here.
call me pocketed but isn't this a perfectly appropriate response for 413?In post 414, PawnsGambit wrote:I can tell Osuka is trying to sort people by conversing with a wide variety of players. This to me is genuine scum hunting.
No such energy since I’m Town but you don’t know that. I’m skeptical of being pushed when I’ve gathered some stubborn votes because there’s probably Scum there. That’s more where it’s coming from.In post 356, Save The Dragons wrote:you also seems suspicious about what the cat said of you. it's that same "why are you targeting me" nervous energy.
This really should happen.In post 391, Andante wrote:My thoughts on this game right now... are complicated. I have a job interview in a bit and after that I'm gonna sit down and organize thoughts on everyone, I didn't realize how fast this would get this chaotic lol
Why are you stuck on an early post that doesn’t really mean much? So I mistakenly assumed a vote was more serious than it was, realized the error of my ways and moved on. What’s the big deal?In post 395, Asteria wrote:@Andres, please tell me why you took that post so seriously:
Please elaborate. I’m dying to see what kind of nonsense you come up with.In post 454, Asteria wrote:I didn't find anything particularly townie in the rest of their iso.
i must have completely missed it because all i see are one liner posts and you never actually elaborate on why you think robert is scumIn post 430, PawnsGambit wrote:This is a pretty stupid approach to mafia.In post 427, InsidiousLemons wrote:not asking you to have hard reads, asking you to back up the claims you've already made.
if you'd like to talk about robert as well, go ahead. i'm all ears
p-edit i am actually defending everyone im not voting. i think everyone is town except the person im currently voting, at all times
I've already made my case on robert.