Mafiascum.net

I really don't see why prof is scum. I'm going to UNVOTE: for now.

In post 450, T3 wrote:I really don't see why prof is scum. I'm going to UNVOTE: for now.

Hmm. One of my top two scum reads coming to the defense of the other.

Am I going to be the one who ends up with a Day 1 hero solve?

In post 448, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:IF NOBODY GIVES ME A GOOD REASON TO TOWNREAD PROFESSOR SCUM SCUM WE ARE GOING TO YEET THIS TO THE MOON

giv me a good reason they scum

In post 391, Not_Mafia wrote:252+ Atk Choice Band Miltank Earthquake vs. 0 HP / 0- Def Drapion: 282-332 (100.3 - 118.1%) -- guaranteed OHKO

Um... erm.. I challenge you to retype that same post WITHOUT looking back at it!

In post 410, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 408, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Drapion + GrandPaMo + Lukewarm HERO-SOLVE?

would u bus d1 if u were scum? is this how this setup would work optimally? sorry im new

He did it with stunning cold blood in the last game.

In post 454, Almost50 wrote:He did it with stunning cold blood in the last game.

IMHO, Drapion is more likely scum than T3 and/or Luke. I trust N_M's reads so I will reassert Gypyx as a scumster here. I no longer SR VPN. Menalque still has his own unique category in my reads.

UNVOTE:

For now. Let me take another look to see where my vote should be

In post 456, Almost50 wrote:IMHO, Drapion is more likely scum than T3 and/or Luke. I trust N_M's reads so I will reassert Gypyx as a scumster here. I no longer SR VPN. Menalque still has his own unique category in my reads.

UNVOTE:

For now. Let me take another look to see where my vote should be

t3 is way more scummier then drap. you can debate luke + drap because honestly u could see how luke is townier than drap. but mmh, can you tell me what drap has done thats more scum?

also you think gypx is scum too? i doubt in that interaction on page 13. i doubt that gypx shitpushes drap in that manner as of a way of bussing. just read that interaction... drap put them in a corner and now they never answered. gypx comes out way scummier in that interaction. this is giving me andante vibes in 2059 >.> where everyone + mafia just started scumreading this one person and i was the only one defending them and they flipped town.

In post 454, Almost50 wrote:

In post 410, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 408, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Drapion + GrandPaMo + Lukewarm HERO-SOLVE?

would u bus d1 if u were scum? is this how this setup would work optimally? sorry im new

He did it with stunning cold blood in the last game.

im scared now:( and lost this game

Placeholder for real content tomorrow.

Early D1 zzzzz

In post 385, VFP wrote:

In post 360, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 345, VFP wrote:I changed my mind on Drapion.
VOTE: ProfessorDrapion

What made you change your mind on me?

Scum want to find the masons here and I think you're trying to do exactly that.

This is not something I even considered. So I looked back over his iso, and I can kind of see it.

Like I can see where his iso could be coming from a "I want to get everyone's town reads quickly and note any time people's reads shift slightly so I can cross reference everything to find the lovers" strategy instead of a "I want to find scum" strategy.

Like half the time someone posts a read, their response is "do you have any more reads" instead of actually talking about the reads themselves

But I am worried that this is just confirmation bias because I already put him in the scum team in my head. Would like to avoid tunneling. Can other people weigh in.

In post 460, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 385, VFP wrote:

In post 360, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 345, VFP wrote:I changed my mind on Drapion.
VOTE: ProfessorDrapion

What made you change your mind on me?

Scum want to find the masons here and I think you're trying to do exactly that.

This is not something I even considered. So I looked back over his iso, and I can kind of see it.

Like I can see where his iso could be coming from a "I want to get everyone's town reads quickly and note any time people's reads shift slightly so I can cross reference everything to find the lovers" strategy instead of a "I want to find scum" strategy.

Like half the time someone posts a read, their response is "do you have any more reads" instead of actually talking about the reads themselves

But I am worried that this is just confirmation bias because I already put him in the scum team in my head. Would like to avoid tunneling. Can other people weigh in.

Spoiler:

In post 96, ProfessorDrapion wrote: Now Bingle, got any other early reads?

In post 106, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 104, Bingle wrote:Hmmm.

Too many scum reads

, not enough time. Monkey get your ass in here, I have need of you.

Hmm?
Where exactly are they?

In post 304, ProfessorDrapion wrote:What’s your current town pool Gramps?

In post 326, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

I would like to request to have Pooky’s Top 3 SR’s and A50’s Top 3 TR’s.

In post 336, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 328, T3 wrote:I do think Lukewarm had a good defense I'll have to think on it.

Ok now here’s what I got for you.

Top 3 Town: Bingle, GrandpaMo, (?)
Top 3 Scum: Lukewarm, Pooky (Soul Read), (?)

In post 379, ProfessorDrapion wrote: You haven’t talked about Mena in here.
What do you feel about them?

Lol.
That second one was in reference towards reads.

I mean I won’t deny that I do want to look at reads.
But if I was going to search for the Masons, I would have went about it differently.

Thus while I can’t prove to you I’m town I can prove (or at least try) to prove that I only had intent for the solve aspect.
No matter my alignment, I want to look Townie and solve. I won’t deny this.

In post 462, ProfessorDrapion wrote:I mean I won’t deny that I do want to look at reads.
But if I was going to search for the Masons, I would have went about it differently.

nd that is?

In post 460, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 385, VFP wrote:

In post 360, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 345, VFP wrote:I changed my mind on Drapion.
VOTE: ProfessorDrapion

What made you change your mind on me?

Scum want to find the masons here and I think you're trying to do exactly that.

This is not something I even considered. So I looked back over his iso, and I can kind of see it.

Like I can see where his iso could be coming from a "I want to get everyone's town reads quickly and note any time people's reads shift slightly so I can cross reference everything to find the lovers" strategy instead of a "I want to find scum" strategy.

Like half the time someone posts a read, their response is "do you have any more reads" instead of actually talking about the reads themselves

But I am worried that this is just confirmation bias because I already put him in the scum team in my head. Would like to avoid tunneling. Can other people weigh in.

Spoiler:

In post 96, ProfessorDrapion wrote: Now Bingle, got any other early reads?

In post 106, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 104, Bingle wrote:Hmmm.

Too many scum reads

, not enough time. Monkey get your ass in here, I have need of you.

Hmm?
Where exactly are they?

In post 304, ProfessorDrapion wrote:What’s your current town pool Gramps?

In post 326, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

I would like to request to have Pooky’s Top 3 SR’s and A50’s Top 3 TR’s.

In post 336, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 328, T3 wrote:I do think Lukewarm had a good defense I'll have to think on it.

Ok now here’s what I got for you.

Top 3 Town: Bingle, GrandpaMo, (?)
Top 3 Scum: Lukewarm, Pooky (Soul Read), (?)

In post 379, ProfessorDrapion wrote: You haven’t talked about Mena in here.
What do you feel about them?

yea i noticed that too. but i didnt say anything just because i thought thats how their towny playstyle is + plus forgetting there were prs in the game lol nd that this wasnt a normal newbie setup. thats why vfp is town honestly. i would probably need to look at drap's other games and do some meta anaylsis... them doing that could just be their town mindset where they are tryna solve interactions and pairs and figure out who mafia is and i do that A LOT. especially in my old community.

In post 460, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 385, VFP wrote:

In post 360, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 345, VFP wrote:I changed my mind on Drapion.
VOTE: ProfessorDrapion

What made you change your mind on me?

Scum want to find the masons here and I think you're trying to do exactly that.

This is not something I even considered. So I looked back over his iso, and I can kind of see it.

Like I can see where his iso could be coming from a "I want to get everyone's town reads quickly and note any time people's reads shift slightly so I can cross reference everything to find the lovers" strategy instead of a "I want to find scum" strategy.

Like half the time someone posts a read, their response is "do you have any more reads" instead of actually talking about the reads themselves

But I am worried that this is just confirmation bias because I already put him in the scum team in my head. Would like to avoid tunneling. Can other people weigh in.

Spoiler:

In post 96, ProfessorDrapion wrote: Now Bingle, got any other early reads?

In post 106, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 104, Bingle wrote:Hmmm.

Too many scum reads

, not enough time. Monkey get your ass in here, I have need of you.

Hmm?
Where exactly are they?

In post 304, ProfessorDrapion wrote:What’s your current town pool Gramps?

In post 326, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

I would like to request to have Pooky’s Top 3 SR’s and A50’s Top 3 TR’s.

In post 336, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 328, T3 wrote:I do think Lukewarm had a good defense I'll have to think on it.

Ok now here’s what I got for you.

Top 3 Town: Bingle, GrandpaMo, (?)
Top 3 Scum: Lukewarm, Pooky (Soul Read), (?)

In post 379, ProfessorDrapion wrote: You haven’t talked about Mena in here.
What do you feel about them?

ur acting like me and i hate it lol

UNVOTE: lukewarm

In post 463, ProfessorDrapion wrote:Thus while I can’t prove to you I’m town I can prove (or at least try) to prove that I only had intent for the solve aspect.
No matter my alignment, I want to look Townie and solve. I won’t deny this.

My entire point is that imo, it does not look like you are trying to solve lol.

I am hoping other people might weigh in on you, so I can tell if it is just tunneling/confirmation bias or not.

Pine I need you to do some townie stuff so I can assemble the Animal Police Department once again.

In post 324, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 323, Gypyx wrote:and anyways, quit deflecting the topic, you're gonna point out these scummy posts of yours or nah?

Deflecting what? LMAO. I answered you.
Read. My. Post.

I said LukeWarm covers it, why are you ignoring Lukewarm, want me to quote it for you? Lol.
Also IMO you could have said what you said without adding the final part to it “or Nah?”
Like adding that final bit to it didn’t look that great, but Maybe it’s just me that feels that way.

welp, i told you i wasn't reading lukewarm that day, did it now, and the case's pretty mixed, some good points, and some big stretches, so idk what to think about it

welp, otherwise i'm writing as i think, so there may be some pointless verbose like that one

pooky, you often play like you're doing rn?

depends on my mood

Whats your mood right now?

pretty good since i rolled TOWN

Wouldn’t your mood be better though if you rolled scum?