Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 10:33 am
Page 19 of 173
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 10:36 am
If we vote for no euphemisation will future votecounts say we kill people
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 10:38 am
Your entrance posts seem a little more proactive than what I thought would be normal for you NK15. That yawn in particular seemed like posting for the sake of posting. Am I wrong?
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 10:39 am
I think proactive is the wrong word, replace with simply active.
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 10:44 am
For future reference, 451 is interesting.
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 10:45 am
I disagree
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 10:46 am
For future reference, N_M in uninteresting.
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 10:47 am
For current reference, your mum is uninterestingIn post 456, House wrote:For future reference, N_M in uninteresting.
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 10:49 am
In other news, IC is a weird selection for a power role.
I'd say it's potentially much worse than Mason.
I'd say it's potentially much worse than Mason.
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 10:53 am
It makes sense with the stumps, we have 3 conftown voices
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 10:55 am
One of which can likely be Strongman killedeven with a doctor, if it exists.In post 459, Not_Mafia wrote:It makes sense with the stumps, we have 3 conftown voices
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 10:56 am
Let's not discuss thatIn post 458, House wrote:In other news, IC is a weird selection for a power role.
I'd say it's potentially much worse than Mason.
It might conceivably not even be one of the selections by a stump as I don't believe Jingle said the setup would be balanced with town having only the selected PRs
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 11:01 am
Like, please do not at any point question decisions that the stumps may or may not have made with regards to power roles, as getting them to defend those choices is akin to rolefishing
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 11:06 am
^ Boring
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 11:06 am
subtleIn post 446, Moongrass wrote:That's what I got from the role PM too haha.In post 432, jjh927 wrote:We're voting to euphemise people? Like, to make a euphemism of them?
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 11:10 am
The unsubtle subbuttle
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 11:21 am
Scum.In post 460, House wrote:One of which can likely be Strongman killedeven with a doctor, if it exists.In post 459, Not_Mafia wrote:It makes sense with the stumps, we have 3 conftown voices
Town.In post 462, jjh927 wrote:Like, please do not at any point question decisions that the stumps may or may not have made with regards to power roles, as getting them to defend those choices is akin to rolefishing
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 11:23 am
Have I won yet?
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 11:25 am
Shade without a vote is sus.In post 466, Moongrass wrote:Scum.In post 460, House wrote:One of which can likely be Strongman killedeven with a doctor, if it exists.In post 459, Not_Mafia wrote:It makes sense with the stumps, we have 3 conftown voices
How brown is your nose right now?In post 466, Moongrass wrote:Town.In post 462, jjh927 wrote:Like, please do not at any point question decisions that the stumps may or may not have made with regards to power roles, as getting them to defend those choices is akin to rolefishing
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 11:26 am
Why would I need to suck up to a player I don't know? What are you implying?
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 11:28 am
VOTE: House
Serious vote
Serious vote
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 11:30 am
Took you long enough.
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 11:30 am
Oh, mistake on the author of the post.
My bad.
My bad.
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 11:33 am
I like VOTE: NK15 better.
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2021 11:39 am
What's up with disparaging you for doing something with what little content there is though?