Mafiascum.net

When did I cast aspersions at you?

--PA

In post 445, Annie Edison wrote:I'll try to type something up more finite after I finish dinner/while we watch LCS

I uh. Ban kennen.

In post 450, Medea the Alien wrote:When did I cast aspersions at you?

--PA

In post 263, Medea the Alien wrote:Very interesting that you breezed right by this without an interest in dancing. You lose about a million points here for that.

In post 276, Medea the Alien wrote::twitch:

In post 322, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 318, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 312, Medea the Alien wrote:Sure. In his ISO up to the point where I posted, there was nothing interesting going on. Not what I'd expect from a player of Lukewarm's caliber. It looked way more like setting up his persona than being useful. Could be shooting the shit, but I was interested in what you'd seen that you didn't feel positively about at that point.

OK, I'm not sure why you led with talking about their read on you then.

His first three posts felt weak, the latter two are jokey in nature.

I do think he is kind of suspicious at this point.

I mean, if you look at it, I made 3 posts in pretty quick succession at the start of the game when there was not much going on, then got off to have lunch.

I am back now. What do you think about my posts since then?

They are still questionable to me at a point where some other people aren't. Not so much that I'm thinking about voting you right now.

In post 368, Here There Be Dragons wrote:even if i were 100% locked on cabdscum which im not, i would say pls don't end the day until we figure out what we're doing with the shard. even if we decide not to use it, it should be intentional

gonna see if i can convince std and/or myself this actually is something.

I say we use the shard somewhere intentional. Reevaluate tomorrow: If the mafia kill is missing, we don't use the shard anymore.

Luke, did you read the sample mafia pm and what did you see in it?

In post 452, Snarky Fishes wrote:

In post 450, Medea the Alien wrote:When did I cast aspersions at you?

--PA

In post 263, Medea the Alien wrote:Very interesting that you breezed right by this without an interest in dancing. You lose about a million points here for that.

In post 276, Medea the Alien wrote::twitch:

A) you ignored Cabd's sally that was quite a toss of info; that's not an aspersion so much as a WTF from what I expected from you here if town. We have other theories at the moment.

B) I twitched at the reminder of Maplewood, which you and half the player list here knows I have good reason to feel icky about from a completely non-gameplay POV.

--PA

In post 451, Medea the Alien wrote:

In post 445, Annie Edison wrote:I'll try to type something up more finite after I finish dinner/while we watch LCS

I uh. Ban kennen.

That was really bad lmao

I just want to see impact on shen

Someone help, I'm about to tunnel on Titus, ~again~

-Bell.

In post 448, Medea the Alien wrote:

In post 447, Snarky Fishes wrote:

In post 446, Medea the Alien wrote:

In post 443, Snarky Fishes wrote:

In post 436, Medea the Alien wrote:

In post 434, Snarky Fishes wrote:Cabd's 367 was all I got, though, and you didn't react to that post, that I noticed anyway.

You didn't really ask for more and we are currently quite busy so it's a bad way to start day one but doing our best. What else did you want from her or from us?

If I got her crumb correctly, then the reference was to a situation where a timing read was more accurate than a tonal one.

seeing the crumb =/= fully understanding it.

Bell has less tolerance for ambiguity and "waiting is" than I do. I have three different possible interpretations.

Pick the most useless one.

heh.

You're running of time to have a good reason not to be old woman yells at clouds about our wagon~

Bus one of your partners and we'll talk.

-Bell.

In post 454, Dunnstral wrote:Luke, did you read the sample mafia pm and what did you see in it?

I did look at it at the start of the game, and I saw the alternate win condition.

This comment did make me look back, and realize that I missed the alternative option for the night kill. I missed that on the first read

You could tunnel AA9 instead who has pretty evidently showed she's not actually trying to read me!

ninja
Ik i was already townreading ffery but thats town bell too

In post 459, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 454, Dunnstral wrote:Luke, did you read the sample mafia pm and what did you see in it?

I did look at it at the start of the game, and I saw the alternate win condition.

This comment did make me look back, and realize that I missed the alternative option for the night kill. I missed that on the first read

Yeah. Nobody pointed out 376 after the fact.

That was my progression in post 141 and 230

In post 455, Medea the Alien wrote:

In post 452, Snarky Fishes wrote:

In post 450, Medea the Alien wrote:When did I cast aspersions at you?

--PA

In post 263, Medea the Alien wrote:Very interesting that you breezed right by this without an interest in dancing. You lose about a million points here for that.

In post 276, Medea the Alien wrote::twitch:

A) you ignored Cabd's sally that was quite a toss of info; that's not an aspersion so much as a WTF from what I expected from you here if town. We have other theories at the moment.

B) I twitched at the reminder of Maplewood, which you and half the player list here knows I have good reason to feel icky about from a completely non-gameplay POV.

--PA

I didn't respond to it. I noticed it.

rolecrumbing, infotossing specifically for my eyes doesn't somehow make you town.

I'm not voting you. It's a really long bridge from not-voting to trusting.

Seriously though,
Dunnstrall, are you town again?

In post 393, Annie Edison wrote:I find myself with varying degrees of townreads on the Medea wagon. And ffery. And manatee. And Dunn. And you.

I don’t think scum is all in (Medea, AA9, Titus, Spiffy)

Mind you not all of them are like take it to the bank reads. I’m just probably cutting too much slack ans trying to figure out where.

In post 442, Annie Edison wrote:I want a bit more about your read on me. I'm trying to read in that pool of four and see if that gamestate view makes any sense (basically had it down to Medea, you, AA9, spiffy) or if im cutting breaks somewhere i shouldnt

ninja-
ah

I feel like I was one of the earliest to actually explain some of their reads though? So thats kinda a weird take

The problem is you have Manatee is your townreads

In post 464, Snarky Fishes wrote:Seriously though,
Dunnstrall, are you town again?

Every game, yes

In post 462, Dunnstral wrote:That was my progression in post 141 and 230

Ohhh

I thought that annie was referring to your post 99, but this makes much more sense.

In post 99, Dunnstral wrote:I didn't realize that scum had an alternative win condition.

In post 377, ArcAngel9 wrote:

In post 90, ManateeGal wrote:i am hesitant abt shards bc from my understanding a certain amount turns a player demonic and mafia win w 7 demonic players

What about sending shards to mafia, since they are already are demons so sending shards doesn't affect them?

I believe the mafia wins when convert at least 7 more town players into demons. Is my understanding of the setup is accurate? can someone validate and confirm on this?

Misunderstanding the setup, or TMI?

In post 468, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 377, ArcAngel9 wrote:

In post 90, ManateeGal wrote:i am hesitant abt shards bc from my understanding a certain amount turns a player demonic and mafia win w 7 demonic players

What about sending shards to mafia, since they are already are demons so sending shards doesn't affect them?

I believe the mafia wins when convert at least 7 more town players into demons. Is my understanding of the setup is accurate? can someone validate and confirm on this?

Misunderstanding the setup, or TMI?

I believe it is more like misunderstand the set up, or town slip, or "town slip"

Because we already know that there are human scum

Look Dunn and aa9, we can't all fake town slip. It really will just give us all away smh

town-dunn, town-sleez,

maybe-town luke, maybe-town annie

I feel like pooky's medea push is performance art. it doesn't feel authentic. dunno if that's AI.

In post 130, Dunnstral wrote:

Spoiler: ManateeGal

In post 46, ManateeGal wrote:

In post 45, Sleez wrote:People are being scummy already but I only have one vote.

interesting

In post 53, ManateeGal wrote:

In post 48, Sleez wrote:

In post 46, ManateeGal wrote:

In post 45, Sleez wrote:People are being scummy already but I only have one vote.

interesting

What's interesting about it?

your phrasing

In post 64, ManateeGal wrote:

In post 55, Sleez wrote:

In post 53, ManateeGal wrote:

In post 48, Sleez wrote:

In post 46, ManateeGal wrote:

In post 45, Sleez wrote:People are being scummy already but I only have one vote.

interesting

What's interesting about it?

your phrasing

Not the fact people are being scummy?

no...? considering theres been like 3 pages and you havent outlined who youre talking about

In post 90, ManateeGal wrote:i am hesitant abt shards bc from my understanding a certain amount turns a player demonic and mafia win w 7 demonic players

In post 93, ManateeGal wrote:i'd assume the number of players that start demonic is 4-5 if 7 demonic players for a maf win

-53 is a bad response because I don't think the "phrasing" is the interesting part, or what that entails
-64 is scummy for asking about this and the response feels off.
-90 is worded like mafia write things and this is an easy angle for scum to take when discussing this mechanic
-93 seems like bad reasoning

Overall I think scum

VOTE: ManateeGal

53 is a bad explanation but Im chalking it up to newbie
64 I dont get why asking for another player's scumreads is scummy
90 I can kinda see
93 Just seems like newbie not good at setup spec

209 is a thing though.

In post 472, Annie Edison wrote:64 I dont get why asking for another player's scumreads is scummy

It's the "there's no case" thing

Ive read that post like five times and I can only now kinda see what youre saying

I just think its an issue in manatee's phrasing, like it literally reads to me as "youve had three pages who were you scumreading here"

Like I dont htink its asking for a case at all