Mafiascum.net

In post 418, House wrote:

In post 416, Thor Ragnarok wrote:VOTE: Gamma

House, why did you move away from your main on Wake? I thought your playstyle there was quite smooth and buttery

Lol

House is not Wake.

In post 448, Bee wrote:

In post 445, House wrote:

In post 440, Titus wrote:

In post 341, ManateeGal wrote:

In post 338, Titus wrote:

In post 331, ManateeGal wrote:is there a basis for the enchant wagon im missing?

mine seems to be based off of lack of content or interactions which is... fine considering what i've done so far.

Why is it fine? What's the problem with pushing awkward, low content slots?

i dont know what youre trying to get at here

You seem to have a problem with the Enchant wagon.

I was toying with the possibility that Manatee & Enchant might both be scum during my catch-up, but ultimately dismissed it as being unlikely on general principle.

What's the principle?

2 scum blundering into competing wagons on d1?

I think Thor knows @titus

In post 445, House wrote:

In post 440, Titus wrote:

In post 341, ManateeGal wrote:

In post 338, Titus wrote:

In post 331, ManateeGal wrote:is there a basis for the enchant wagon im missing?

mine seems to be based off of lack of content or interactions which is... fine considering what i've done so far.

Why is it fine? What's the problem with pushing awkward, low content slots?

i dont know what youre trying to get at here

You seem to have a problem with the Enchant wagon.

I was toying with the possibility that Manatee & Enchant might both be scum during my catch-up, but ultimately dismissed it as being unlikely on general principle.

What principle is that praytell?

In post 450, Titus wrote:

In post 418, House wrote:

In post 416, Thor Ragnarok wrote:VOTE: Gamma

House, why did you move away from your main on Wake? I thought your playstyle there was quite smooth and buttery

Lol

House is not Wake.

Pretty sure he was trolling my signature.

In post 451, House wrote:2 scum blundering into competing wagons on d1?

See situation room. 3 scum were wagoned d1.

I like Ydrasse as town lol

In post 455, Titus wrote:

In post 451, House wrote:2 scum blundering into competing wagons on d1?

See situation room. 3 scum were wagoned d1.

Just because one wife gives her husband carte blanche on extramarital affairs doesn't mean wives sign off on such behavior on a regular basis.

YIKES

maybe that's an overreaction but something tells me that's not gonna strike a good chord with titus

VOTE: House

1) I feel like your anger at Gamma is like.... really fast. It escalated up to "no kill one of us" in a way that doesn't feel organic to me.
2) I don't know how much you've played but you're an older user and I find it kinda unbelievable that you'd dismiss two scum wagons D1 because they happen not an uncommon amount imo.
3) I like Gamma and Manatee as town right now so woo.

In post 457, House wrote:

In post 455, Titus wrote:

In post 451, House wrote:2 scum blundering into competing wagons on d1?

See situation room. 3 scum were wagoned d1.

Just because one wife gives her husband carte blanche on extramarital affairs doesn't mean wives sign off on such behavior on a regular basis.

It's common enough (the scum wagoned, not the affairs). Plus Enchant never really took off. It's too early to tell yes or no. It's just good to push them both.

Your Gamma vote makes me sad.

Anywho, I'm not particularly invested in a read on Enchant. Their posts weren't particularly notable to me during my catch-up, and I've been engaged elsewhere in the thread.

Also what is that comparison. .-.

In post 459, Gamma Emerald wrote:maybe that's an overreaction but something tells me that's not gonna strike a good chord with titus

There were no affairs with my ex marriage.

In post 456, Titus wrote:I like Ydrasse as town lol

I don't think you've ever TR me so I went 'yay' IRL :3

the wagons were also RVS wagons which I feel like have more ability to be SvS

In post 464, Titus wrote:

In post 459, Gamma Emerald wrote:maybe that's an overreaction but something tells me that's not gonna strike a good chord with titus

There were no affairs with my ex marriage.

wasn't sure, just felt like it was a touchy subject

In post 460, Bee wrote:VOTE: House

1) I feel like your anger at Gamma is like.... really fast. It escalated up to "no kill one of us" in a way that doesn't feel organic to me.
2) I don't know how much you've played but you're an older user and I find it kinda unbelievable that you'd dismiss two scum wagons D1 because they happen not an uncommon amount imo.
3) I like Gamma and Manatee as town right now so woo.

It's shit play to refer to ongoing games when addressing a read on somebody because anything that person says in response can lead to a ban.

I don't give a damn if Gamma gets mod confirmed as all innocent child at L-1, I'd hammer him just for ban baiting me.

In post 467, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 464, Titus wrote:

In post 459, Gamma Emerald wrote:maybe that's an overreaction but something tells me that's not gonna strike a good chord with titus

There were no affairs with my ex marriage.

wasn't sure, just felt like it was a touchy subject

If something's triggering, I'll say so but it would have to be conduct/references that are particularly close to what happened fyi.

I appreciate you looking out for me.

In post 468, House wrote:

In post 460, Bee wrote:VOTE: House

1) I feel like your anger at Gamma is like.... really fast. It escalated up to "no kill one of us" in a way that doesn't feel organic to me.
2) I don't know how much you've played but you're an older user and I find it kinda unbelievable that you'd dismiss two scum wagons D1 because they happen not an uncommon amount imo.
3) I like Gamma and Manatee as town right now so woo.

It's shit play to refer to ongoing games when addressing a read on somebody because anything that person says in response can lead to a ban.

I don't give a damn if Gamma gets mod confirmed as all innocent child at L-1, I'd hammer him just for ban baiting me.

House, people make mistakes. You're overreacting here. I'd hate to miseliminate you here, but I will for the game state.

In post 468, House wrote:

In post 460, Bee wrote:VOTE: House

1) I feel like your anger at Gamma is like.... really fast. It escalated up to "no kill one of us" in a way that doesn't feel organic to me.
2) I don't know how much you've played but you're an older user and I find it kinda unbelievable that you'd dismiss two scum wagons D1 because they happen not an uncommon amount imo.
3) I like Gamma and Manatee as town right now so woo.

It's shit play to refer to ongoing games when addressing a read on somebody because anything that person says in response can lead to a ban.

I don't give a damn if Gamma gets mod confirmed as all innocent child at L-1, I'd hammer him just for ban baiting me.

I mean yeah it sucks but also getting that mad about it that fast in conjunction with dismissing two other people and parking there is ??

i think there's groovier reasons to vote house but the house wagon is literally fine. if i had to give it a score out of 10, i'd refuse, and say "it's fine".

i think house will actually generate more quality content if we stop talking about house vs. gamma.

outsourcing all opinions to titus while i'm busy.

In post 470, Titus wrote:

In post 468, House wrote:

In post 460, Bee wrote:VOTE: House

1) I feel like your anger at Gamma is like.... really fast. It escalated up to "no kill one of us" in a way that doesn't feel organic to me.
2) I don't know how much you've played but you're an older user and I find it kinda unbelievable that you'd dismiss two scum wagons D1 because they happen not an uncommon amount imo.
3) I like Gamma and Manatee as town right now so woo.

It's shit play to refer to ongoing games when addressing a read on somebody because anything that person says in response can lead to a ban.

I don't give a damn if Gamma gets mod confirmed as all innocent child at L-1, I'd hammer him just for ban baiting me.

House, people make mistakes. You're overreacting here. I'd hate to miseliminate you here, but I will for the game state.

It's not a mistake. It's behavior that happens all the time.

I can't remember the last game I've read that didn't have a mention of "ongoing game/s". It's bad in general, but when it's being used to prop up a read, it's bad faith because the person being shaded cannot give a fair response without getting themselves banned.

In post 451, House wrote:2 scum blundering into competing wagons on d1?

definitely a thing that happens