Mafiascum.net

VOTE: Connordragon07

My interpretation is that there isn't enough appetite for flow trap today. Let me know if I am wrong. This is my next best suggestion.

I would say that voting Connordragon07 seems reasonable due to Post 424 where he says that he thought that we miseliminated RegRider. This could be a legitimate slip or he could have been so confident that RegRider was Town, that he thought that it was mislim. However, I am propably going to wait a while for Connordragon07's response and then decide whether or not I should vote him.

I'm curious to hear more from RegRider, especially their thoughts on Connordragon and their reaction to the long sought-after readslist from Cheeky.

In post 451, RH9 wrote:I would say that voting Connordragon07 seems reasonable due to Post 424 where he says that he thought that we miseliminated RegRider. This could be a legitimate slip or he could have been so confident that RegRider was Town, that he thought that it was mislim. However, I am propably going to wait a while for Connordragon07's response and then decide whether or not I should vote him.

Not really sure if Snivy would remember but when I played with them on Mafia.gg, I was extremely against voting without evidence. RVS is fine for me since we're just messing around and nobody's gonna be condemned during it, but unless Cop had info/it was pretty much confirmed townies left I just wouldn't hammer unless I rolled mafia. Just used to ToS logic where it isn't optimal to condemn someone D2 unless somebody had significant info or just outright refused to claim on the stand.

Votecount 1.8

RegRider(2)

~ DaTacoX(40), camelCasedSnivy(97)

Connordragon07(2)

~ CheekyTeeky(48), Prism(62)

MargotRosa(1)

~ flow trap(76)

flow trap(1)

~ MargotRosa(14)


Not Voting (3): Connordragon07(24), RegRider(18), RH9(58)

With 9 alive it takes 5 to eliminate.

Day 1 deadline is in (expired on 2021-09-27 18:24:47)

FLAVOR

During the day this room really lights up.

In post 449, Prism wrote:My flow trap read is based off of my prior experience with them in Newbie 2051: Iceland. It is difficult to explain to others except that I don't think they townread me so easily.

In post 386, Prism wrote:I also am puzzled at that flow trap placement because that read on me from flow trap is deeply troubling from a meta perspective. Flow trap's last game with me they watched me control an entire game start to finish as scum, and turn myself into a UTR the second I felt like being one.

There's being eager to try again but townreading me with this little content is really out there.

I mean, you acted quite different

In post 456, flow trap wrote:

In post 449, Prism wrote:My flow trap read is based off of my prior experience with them in Newbie 2051: Iceland. It is difficult to explain to others except that I don't think they townread me so easily.

In post 386, Prism wrote:I also am puzzled at that flow trap placement because that read on me from flow trap is deeply troubling from a meta perspective. Flow trap's last game with me they watched me control an entire game start to finish as scum, and turn myself into a UTR the second I felt like being one.

There's being eager to try again but townreading me with this little content is really out there.

I mean, you acted quite different

I addressed this in post 356. If this read is legitimate, you are fortunate that it will go unpunished.

In post 457, Prism wrote:

In post 456, flow trap wrote:

In post 449, Prism wrote:My flow trap read is based off of my prior experience with them in Newbie 2051: Iceland. It is difficult to explain to others except that I don't think they townread me so easily.

In post 386, Prism wrote:I also am puzzled at that flow trap placement because that read on me from flow trap is deeply troubling from a meta perspective. Flow trap's last game with me they watched me control an entire game start to finish as scum, and turn myself into a UTR the second I felt like being one.

There's being eager to try again but townreading me with this little content is really out there.

I mean, you acted quite different

I addressed this in post 356. If this read is legitimate, you are fortunate that it will go unpunished.

Sorry, I was wondering what you meant by that

I want it on record that I hate this Reg wagon

If they flip red, I'll gladly eat my hat, but I strongly suspect there will be no hat eating

In post 455, CheekyTeeky wrote:VOTE: Regrider

Also hate that this vote was made without pointing out that this puts Reg one vote away from elimination

It takes 5 to elim. That would put RegRider at 3

In post 461, MargotRosa wrote:

In post 455, CheekyTeeky wrote:VOTE: Regrider

Also hate that this vote was made without pointing out that this puts Reg one vote away from elimination

You do realize its two not one… right?

I don't know why I thought it was 4 to elim d1. Apologies. I retract my hate

In post 453, Connordragon07 wrote:

In post 451, RH9 wrote:I would say that voting Connordragon07 seems reasonable due to Post 424 where he says that he thought that we miseliminated RegRider. This could be a legitimate slip or he could have been so confident that RegRider was Town, that he thought that it was mislim. However, I am propably going to wait a while for Connordragon07's response and then decide whether or not I should vote him.

Not really sure if Snivy would remember but when I played with them on Mafia.gg, I was extremely against voting without evidence. RVS is fine for me since we're just messing around and nobody's gonna be condemned during it, but unless Cop had info/it was pretty much confirmed townies left I just wouldn't hammer unless I rolled mafia. Just used to ToS logic where it isn't optimal to condemn someone D2 unless somebody had significant info or just outright refused to claim on the stand.

I understand. I probably not going to vote you, for now.

I will be around tomorrow to vote as needed. I'm pretty disappointed by the lack of substantive input from many of the slots as we approach deadline.

In post 452, Prism wrote:I'm curious to hear more from RegRider, especially their thoughts on Connordragon and their reaction to the long sought-after readslist from Cheeky.

I agree. I would like to hear from him as well. To be fair, after reading back by myself, I can see why it was so incorrect of me to vote both you and RegRider at different points without thinking about the evidence. I'm probably going to vote tomorrow too.

Actually, I better vote today before I go to sleep.

And actually, I might vote for Connordragon07 because he seems to want Cop to out if they have info even though this might put Cop in danger. See Post 453. VOTE: Connordragon07

But then, he seems sure that there's a Cop and was not that upset at my PR hunt. See Post 104.

And by the way I'm probably not going to active for the rest of Day 1 (because in my timezone, Day 1 ends while I'm sleeping). And sorry for the short posts.

In post 469, RH9 wrote:And actually, I might vote for Connordragon07 because he seems to want Cop to out if they have info even though this might put Cop in danger. See Post 453. VOTE: Connordragon07

Cop should out if they have a guilty, but this is funny coming from the person who was PR fishing.

Yeah, I know. I'm going to post my reads/observations soon.

And as possibly my last post for Day 1, I'm going to make a table of observations.

RH9's Observations
Player	Notes
Connordragon07	Does not seem concerned about my PR hunt and seems to find it all right for Cop to out if they have info, even. if this could lead to a PR getting killed by Mafia. Seemed to have thought that eliminating RegRider was mislim, though that seems to be because he thinks that we shouldn't vote without evidence, which makes sense. See Posts 104, 424,438, and 453.
DaTacoX	Is very good at being convincing. Made a readslist. See Post 341, and see Post 412, which convinced me to vote RegRider, for a while.
MargotRosa	Also is very good at being convincing. See Post 271 which convinced me to vote Prism, for a while.
RegRider	Seems to be pro-Town, because of reaction to my PR hunt. See Post 472.
camelCasedSnivy	Seems to be helpful and one of the pro-Town. Made a readslist. See Post 384, and 441.
CheekyTeeky	Seems very helpful and pro-Town. Made a readlist. See Post 342.
flow trap	Started a bandwagon on RegRider, then voted Connordragon07, then after MargotRosa voted them, voted her. See Posts 281, 405, and 409
Prism	Seems to be pro-Town and made two readslists. See Posts 244, 279, 280, 427, 428, 429, 430, and 433, to list a few.