Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2021 6:31 am
Whats the point?? Ur never dying this game always unless a scum whos spewed you town flips - there's 0 drawback here. And if you and i get spewed town you die anyways bc im unkillable
Whats the point?? Ur never dying this game always unless a scum whos spewed you town flips - there's 0 drawback here. And if you and i get spewed town you die anyways bc im unkillable
Okay, how about this.In post 451, SCP 999 wrote:Losing is fairly unfun, i agree.
I'm just going to ignore your emotional manipulation because the constsnt complaints dont tell me your alignment only that my claim that you're scum frustrates you.
i guess, weirder things have happened thoughIn post 450, SCP 999 wrote:Whats the point?? Ur never dying this game always unless a scum whos spewed you town flips - there's 0 drawback here. And if you and i get spewed town you die anyways bc im unkillable
You don't get to be the arbiter of this. I think you do have decent scum equity this game. Even if you turn out to be town, it's fine that I'm wrong, but the things I saw don't just go away either.In post 454, SCP 999 wrote:My play hadn't been scummy.
Why is me going under the radar after shooting a policy elimination bait not towny? I'm pushing the person I think is scum, they're the leading wagon, and I'm giving less info to the scum.In post 457, SCP 999 wrote:You have demonstrated a good awareness of whats gone on thus far this game - which suggests up until i started to shine a light youve tried going under the radar.
That's definitely not towny.
you do this regardless of alignmentIn post 362, SCP 999 wrote:thats always true about koba - koba is always scum when they're mad and say a lot of words and put pressure on people - literally 100% read rate guys
honestly even if it's not a slip I don't like the reaction anywaysIn post 365, Infinity Zero wrote:you're acting like it's a weird stretch to think that you're accusing me of being scum pushing dwlee. and i was one of two slots pushing dwlee. i don't get how this can be considered a slip at all. same thing @dunnIn post 356, SirCakez wrote:ok and?
i also feel like gamma's vote on dwlee was pretty clearly not trying to elim them right away but whatever
-infinity
why?
what game was that even?In post 382, SCP 999 wrote:I agree - and i will ellaborate that SC has shown no higher thought process in pursuing these pushes when as town they do - when i faced them as scum when they were on fire as town(and i got them mislimmed by saying they bussed xD) -> it was a cakez that could parse stuff. paragraph level stuff.
this is 1 sentence cakez.
2 words and a vote cakez.
this is not town cakez thought process being shown.
y'all chill out this is ridiculousIn post 384, Infinity Zero wrote:God fucking dammit
I never would have thought the day would come where infinity felt like a burden but it’s here and I feel like shit for thinking that way but I’ve had a very minimal role in how things have played out so far so I feel like this doesn’t fall on me
We’re I playing alone in this situation I’d probably do something rash and spiteful but I’m trying to not let my friend down here. Instead, I’m going to fight this elim with every fiber of my being so that even if I don’t succeed maybe after the flip you idiots will WAKE THE FUCK UP and push ACTUAL SCUM!!!!!!!!
Dunn, I know what you’re playing at here, and you’re having a very uncharitable view of my meta. I don’t know what “small thing” you think I overreacted to but I assure you you’re taking a bad sample, which is fucking ironic given how delusional I made myself that game! As for why I thought SM reacting like marcistar was voteworthy, maybe because I wanted to probe further and try to get more out of SM + people familiar with Tarot UPick? And instead it got speedlimmed, which while I’m not happy about it I also am with Ceph that SM wasn’t exactly doing herself any favors by being so abrasive (which is why I find his SR on us remarkably stupid).
As for me saying you hadn’t justified your vote on us, I’d only skimmed the posts in the thread since I last posted when I said that. I actually saw your case when I saw Cakez’s quoting it when I responded to that post.
-Gamma
I have, once. It was just to get a CC though.In post 426, Dwlee99 wrote:I don't know if I've ever seen scum fake claim vigilante
also @Koba I agree with thisIn post 433, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Koba has yet to provide a reasonable explaination for their tinfoil on me and continues to push this narrative despite being told why it is unreasonable.
can you think of any reason why you have this ability? i can'tIn post 424, SCP 999 wrote:Theres only 1 unaccounted for dclass and i am already a town protective - and for me to DISABLE my ability is 2 dclass so I'm having trouble believing this vig claim - especially since its 1 shot and so gated supposedly.
Towniness isn't based on actions for me, galron and dunn both didn't have bad vibesIn post 293, Infinity Zero wrote:why is galron as high as dunn?
Wasn't ready for a full push on you, and Cakez hadn't posted much yetIn post 294, Cephrir wrote:why aren't you voting for me thenIn post 292, Zyla wrote:I won't be around for the rest of the night, so here's a readslist
Cephrir - Scum
I don't follow, I'm not aware of anyone else directly acknowledging cakez, and cakez hadn't even reached 5 posts at the time you brought up how little they were posting and I concurred.In post 390, SCP 999 wrote:like i think cakez and zyla are tied in terms of partner equity from how they are treating eachother - zyla basically ignoring cakez while cakez subtly defending zyla on top of their very jarring leaps between thoughts and for cakez, refusal to allow us to examine their thought process.
Again not following this logic. Aren't there plenty of reasons a town player might not want to be in the spotlight, particularly early game?In post 457, SCP 999 wrote:You [SirCakez] have demonstrated a good awareness of whats gone on thus far this game - which suggests up until i started to shine a light youve tried going under the radar.
That's definitely not towny.