Mafiascum.net

I just almost alt-slipped and I think my heart stopped.

Can't wait to get our PT together. (.❛ ᴗ ❛.)

In post 439, Color Purple wrote:Wait, have you gone up to the part when I scumlean Star for his attacks on Blue and Diamond?

In post 440, Color Purple wrote:And Star's read on Orange feels off to me. I can't explain why. It's probably because I

can't

view anything from Orange as coming from

scum

.

Yeah but dislike the Orange read the most. I feel bad for Orange now because they either get paired with a slot I’m iffy about or a possible headache. I don’t envy their position here.

I'm here, sorry, got distracted by life and all. I'll catch up and post more tomorrow

jst sayin i hv a lfe outsd of gme as wll u kno.

Also i wld rck ur rnts sox off.

Based on this last page I see Blue seems to have paired with Circle. I wish her the best, as I should have tried harder if I really wanted to pair with Circle. Aside from that, been a bit busy, so have only really skimmed things between my last post and now. I do wish to apologize if my actions made Diamond feel unhappy though, because I feel like I did not try to interact with them outside a very shallow engagement. So I would not be surprised if that was a factor in the displeasure they expressed upon coming in a couple days ago.

In post 453, Triangle Shape wrote:jst sayin i hv a lfe outsd of gme as wll u kno.

Also i wld rck ur rnts sox off.

But when you do post you aren't providing much of anything, and your posting style makes it difficult to engage with you.
A reads list would be nice to see where you are with the game

Orange if you had to pair right now who would you pair with and why.
That goes for green too.

In post 443, Circle Shape wrote:i have decided

Pair: Blue

i hope you will accept i think we would make a good team

In post 445, Color Blue wrote:

pair: circle

you had me at hello

A Blue Circle Pair has been formed!



Any further attempted Pairings with or from Color Blue and Circle Shape will be ignored.

In post 455, Color Red wrote:

In post 453, Triangle Shape wrote:jst sayin i hv a lfe outsd of gme as wll u kno.

Also i wld rck ur rnts sox off.

But when you do post you aren't providing much of anything, and your posting style makes it difficult to engage with you.
A reads list would be nice to see where you are with the game

we cld hv entre cnvos tlkin lke ths. I trd 2 engge. nbdy wnna ply.

slv is Red Pnta Str. gg no re.

Why do you think Penta's read flip on Red is scum theatre rather than a natural reaction to 150 ?

i wnt cnsdr nonanon psts or reacts.

reds 313 hd no react from ne1, yet is v smilar 2 my ntry.

pnta sddenly no cmmt or "i spke 2 mod 2 vrify"

buddiez.

lk @ 159 & 162

313 isn't similar to what you said and isn't his entry post.

Red said shapes/colors have nothing to do with roles/alignment.

you said that maybe shapes could pair with shapes and pairs don't have to be color/shape.

Did you just get the wrong post number?

Also I don't see why people would ignore the previous Red's posts even if they were made as non-anon.

huh i msred.

meh. slv nt chngd.

prv psts r scmmy. Crrnt psts nt bettr.

jst ignrin nonanon psts.

ok but why would Pentagon decide to bury Red as "scummiest color" only to completely read flip on the post?

How does that make sense as a planned interaction?

What do you find scummy about the current red posts?


What do you find scummy about Pentagon?

red hs nt sat wll wi me at all thru ths phse.

Pntas intratns wi me were bd. Trd to loop arnd my psts & ddge.

Pnta slms Red. But, is paird. Tht i rd, it ddn't seem rght.

Penta didn't like the way you were talking in the thread because it's difficult to read and interact with, I don't see how that's a scummy interaction?

You are kind of hard to understand/interact with because of the way you write.

Penta already explained the read flip on Red, the speed was actually I think +town for penta because it seemed like an in the moment reaction to Red.

What has red done that hasn't sat well with you?

ovrall feel is off.

Pnta ddnt try 2 intract wi me v well. Yes its a wll, its scalble. Loop argumnt & msdrctin ws usd agnst me.

TmRd ws b4 tht intrctin.

In post 315, Color Blue wrote:

In post 309, Color Green wrote:I think I'm focused way too much on trying to figure out Blue and not enough on sorting the shapes. Refocusing as I type.

Mmm while I am somewhat flattered by the attention, why are you so interested in figuring me out ?

Your posts just kind of stick out, so as I'm trying to solve they just draw my attention? Like, they just seem weird to me coming from a town POV.

Also:

In post 408, Arrow Shape wrote:I've caught up.

Blue seems townie. They're a bit artificial, but I don't find it being used to much advantage other than being inoffensive to reduce scum reads/suspicion.

They don't feel like passive scum to me, due to some of their suggestions.

What does this even mean? Like, if you think it's artificial, why do you think they are being artificial, and why is that townie?

I think I would trust a Diamond/Orange pair more than I would trust some of the other pairs that have already formed.

In post 468, Color Green wrote:Your posts just kind of stick out, so as I'm trying to solve they just draw my attention? Like, they just seem weird to me coming from a town POV.

Which ones and why?

I am happy to talk about my POV to help you understand.

@Color Green, I guess I'll clarify.
People act differently in different settings, arguably they aren't acting like themselves. For example, I'm a heck of a lot less pushy in most real life settings than when I'm playing mafia.
They're acting inoffensive and using spoilers for the edgiest posts they make. For it to be scummy there has to be some sort of advantage to it. I typically expect polite scum to fade into the background, but blue just keeps going, they want to be here.

In post 460, Triangle Shape wrote:i wnt cnsdr nonanon psts or reacts.

reds 313 hd no react from ne1, yet is v smilar 2 my ntry.

pnta sddenly no cmmt or "i spke 2 mod 2 vrify"

buddiez.

i find your posts unreadable and if you’re going to call me scum every other post, I will not be commenting on that because an inexplicable confibias, is something I can’t in good faith engage with.

In post 463, Triangle Shape wrote:huh i msred.

meh. slv nt chngd.

prv psts r scmmy. Crrnt psts nt bettr.

jst ignrin nonanon psts.

Can you please stop with the text speak. It makes your posts extremely frustrating to read. If this is about me, what don’t you like about my posts?

In post 465, Triangle Shape wrote:red hs nt sat wll wi me at all thru ths phse.

Pntas intratns wi me were bd. Trd to loop arnd my psts & ddge.

Pnta slms Red. But, is paird. Tht i rd, it ddn't seem rght.

I switched my read on red because of their predecessor’s post. What is your opinion of that post?