Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2022 10:35 pm
I am refering to your tendency to not listen to other people and only care about your own reads.In post 406, Masquerader Olive wrote:I realize that I’m probably being unfair because none of you have access to our pt and perhaps if I didn’t, I maybe wouldn’t know what to think of purple but I do and no way does intruder purple make the posts in our pt that they are. I am not being pocketed in there and if cyan and yellow were still in the game, I wouldn’t care but I know I’m not wrong here but you need to pay attention the most to what’s happening in your pts because intruders cannot fake the degree of genuine solving that both me and purple are doing in ours. So, I will just straight out let the cat out if the bag. I know who purple is and that is my strongest reason for invitee reading them and unfortunately that’s all I can post about that in the main thread. If you either wrongly think I’m intruder or I don’t know what I’m talking about then I don’t know what to tell you but purple doesn’t make the kinds of posts in our pt as intruder. They just don’t. I’m kicking myself also but it was me who stupidly got cyan and yellow wrong, not purple.
Okay I can agree with that point. I am not sure it applies to blue because only new new blue has been playing in that slot since you entered, but I can accept a similar point in that olive has had a much longer time to establish a pocket on me than blue has had on you. I will say that if olive is intruder and successfully pocketed me then this is potentially the best performance they've ever given and far above their usual range.In post 442, Masquerader Red wrote:A pocket is much harder to maintain with multiple people coming and going.In post 437, Masquerader Purple wrote:I don't understand what this is referring to, there is logically no reason to assume olive and I are any less susceptible to being pocketed than either you or blue.In post 433, Masquerader Red wrote:Also, Blue and I are not the same slots so a strategic pocket is unlikely.
This is a lie, blue is unable to guess my identity as are the majority of players on this site. I would not be surprised if they are able to guess olive as I feared they would be findable to a number of intruders. I also doubt that blue is sincere about not caring whether they win or lose this game, I assume they prefer to win as would the majority of players.In post 454, Masquerader Blue wrote:I do not care about being right or winning this game. I know who each of you are and what each of you is willing to accept and do. I am accepting your solution because I do not have the energy to argue with you.
I'm assuming this is the transaction you're referring to and will review this until I receive confirmation I am mistaken.In post 128, Masquerader Purple wrote:I don't know if the moderator accepts retractions:In post 125, Masquerader Olive wrote:Why don’t you just retract the invites you’re less sure of then?
I’m not entirely sure I understand the automan mechanic but I would strongly advise you to retract your invite to magenta.
What about what Yellow said about you using the word “mask”? Are you saying you know who I am? I really want to trust you but I’m scared.
Rescind offer to magenta
Rescind offer to teal
The automaton mechanic means that after pairs form, if the intruders can guess both of the identities correctly in that pair then both players will die instantly. Intruders have two chances at this.
Yellow is arguing that I slipped which is not likely to lead to good results in any circumstances I have witnessed. I also didn't use the word mask exactly, I used masqué, which this setup is named and one of the first words we all see when we click on this setup. I assumed the factions were masqué and intruder which I now know is inaccurate. I don't fully understand how yellow is perceiving that I slipped but yellow's conviction in it makes me think they might be an invitee who I upset earlier. And yes, that's what I'm implying.
In post 421, Masquerader Red wrote:Purple's first offer happens to be every player left alive in the game. That would be an odd coinicidence.In post 85, Masquerader Purple wrote:In post 76, Masquerader Green wrote:VOTE: Masquerader Yellow
This is where my suspicions point me currently. I do not trust the way they took Purple's post out of context.In post 82, Masquerader Green wrote:oh I thought this was just gonna be a regular game, huh
UNVOTE: Masquerader Yellow, and yellow is an intruder; therefore I am deducing that the intruders are green and yellow. Olive was my red herring and teal was red's red herring.Green doesn't want to appear aligned with yellow
Offer hand: Red
Offer hand: Olive
Offer hand: Blue
Offer hand: Teal
Offer hand: Magenta
Their acceptance might be coordinated. Based on their own admissions
1) Purple did an about face on Olive.
2) Olive originally wanted to pair with red supposedly but changed his mind.
3) Purple wanted hard to identify people to pair with easy to identify people but currently rests on meta knowledge for Olive town.
4) Olive asks Purple to retract invites and Olive accepts 4 minutes later. The rationale is the thought process looked invitee.
5) The awkward you were right I was town.
VOTE: Purple/Olive
I think I want to see this through.
How can you know anyone, including Olive, so well and be unidentifiable to most members on this site?In post 456, Masquerader Purple wrote:This is a lie, blue is unable to guess my identity as are the majority of players on this site. I would not be surprised if they are able to guess olive as I feared they would be findable to a number of intruders. I also doubt that blue is sincere about not caring whether they win or lose this game, I assume they prefer to win as would the majority of players.
OuchIn post 452, Masquerader Blue wrote:I am refering to your tendency to not listen to other people and only care about your own reads.In post 406, Masquerader Olive wrote:I realize that I’m probably being unfair because none of you have access to our pt and perhaps if I didn’t, I maybe wouldn’t know what to think of purple but I do and no way does intruder purple make the posts in our pt that they are. I am not being pocketed in there and if cyan and yellow were still in the game, I wouldn’t care but I know I’m not wrong here but you need to pay attention the most to what’s happening in your pts because intruders cannot fake the degree of genuine solving that both me and purple are doing in ours. So, I will just straight out let the cat out if the bag. I know who purple is and that is my strongest reason for invitee reading them and unfortunately that’s all I can post about that in the main thread. If you either wrongly think I’m intruder or I don’t know what I’m talking about then I don’t know what to tell you but purple doesn’t make the kinds of posts in our pt as intruder. They just don’t. I’m kicking myself also but it was me who stupidly got cyan and yellow wrong, not purple.
I do not care about your accuracy.
It is unfun to play with regardless of whether you are right or wrong.
In post 453, Masquerader Blue wrote:I am literally voting to get you what you want.
I don't know if your solution is right. I hope for your sake it is.
My current strongest intruder read is still teal. I don’t think that they haven’t shown much interest in solving either me or purple. Don’t you find it extremely odd that they are content to votepark us and make absolutely no effort to reacess?In post 454, Masquerader Blue wrote:I do not care about being right or winning this game. I know who each of you are and what each of you is willing to accept and do. I am accepting your solution because I do not have the energy to argue with you.
I obviously only know for sure I am but if they’re actually intruder, then they’re doing one helluva a job pocketing me both in the main thread and our pt.In post 459, Masquerader Red wrote:Olive, how do you know Purple is town?
I will respond to this later. I’m extremely upset by blue’s recent posts to me but I promise to do my best to address all of your questions to the best of my ability once I calm down.In post 467, Masquerader Red wrote:@Olive, you didn't at all get suspicious when they told you their identity? Did you take steps to verify it? Can you address post 460?
In post 458, Masquerader Blue wrote:my current plan is to vote out teal/magenta and then leave the dance to give you two the solution you think is correct
but sure keep saying I am lying scum. that totally makes so much sense
It’s this specific post that I literally cannot deal with not after what one of the players has not only put me through during the game but even afterwards. I seriously cannot cope with anything like this.In post 452, Masquerader Blue wrote:I am refering to your tendency to not listen to other people and only care about your own reads.In post 406, Masquerader Olive wrote:I realize that I’m probably being unfair because none of you have access to our pt and perhaps if I didn’t, I maybe wouldn’t know what to think of purple but I do and no way does intruder purple make the posts in our pt that they are. I am not being pocketed in there and if cyan and yellow were still in the game, I wouldn’t care but I know I’m not wrong here but you need to pay attention the most to what’s happening in your pts because intruders cannot fake the degree of genuine solving that both me and purple are doing in ours. So, I will just straight out let the cat out if the bag. I know who purple is and that is my strongest reason for invitee reading them and unfortunately that’s all I can post about that in the main thread. If you either wrongly think I’m intruder or I don’t know what I’m talking about then I don’t know what to tell you but purple doesn’t make the kinds of posts in our pt as intruder. They just don’t. I’m kicking myself also but it was me who stupidly got cyan and yellow wrong, not purple.
I do not care about your accuracy.
It is unfun to play withregardless of whether you are right or wrong.
Your questions and concerns are completely valid and reasonable and you won’t have to repeat any of it.In post 470, Masquerader Red wrote:I can wait. I appreciate you acknowledging my posts and the fact you haven't answered them wholly. It drives me mad to ask the same thing five times over and not get a response. Makes me automatically think scum. If I know a limitation, I can factor that in. Don't take that as me trusting you. I think this posting is growth as a player, regardless of your alignment.
Also, your speech patterns and thoughts processes are obvious.
I don’t understand why you would do that unless you have reasons to intruder read red and you have made it clear so far that you don’t.In post 473, Masquerader Blue wrote:I am going to leave after we vote out Teal/Magenta
We do not have to talk about anything else