I'm probably legitimately going to case implosion in the next couple of days.
I'd be happy seeing his slot get lynched and if it means dogging through these 180 some pages to make a convincing case then damn it ima try
1) I townread beeboy. Don't know why. Mostly gut.In post 4351, Dunnstral wrote:podoboq, do you have a special reason to trust beeboy's miller claim as well? Just wondering
I mean.....no? Sure? Maybe?In post 4421, kraska77 wrote:Silence, fool
Can you like
pipe down and chair the symposium?
Podo has been crumbling pr for a while now btw
I'm town. Not sure about implosion.In post 4437, Boem_u_dusi wrote:I want to know implosion and podoboq alignments the most.
That's the idea, yeah. If people want to lynch me, they're dumb, but if that's going to be the trend, then do it so I can claim, you can realize that I'm definitely town, and we still have time to redirect elsewhere.In post 4474, Boem_u_dusi wrote:We have around 5 days left. This vote is probably pointless because he can just pop in and claim some crap.
I was talking about implosion?In post 4508, podoboq wrote:That's the idea, yeah. If people want to lynch me, they're dumb, but if that's going to be the trend, then do it so I can claim, you can realize that I'm definitely town, and we still have time to redirect elsewhere.In post 4474, Boem_u_dusi wrote:We have around 5 days left. This vote is probably pointless because he can just pop in and claim some crap.
By that logic, what wagon isn't pointless? One on somebody's who has already claimed?In post 4509, Boem_u_dusi wrote:I was talking about implosion?In post 4508, podoboq wrote:That's the idea, yeah. If people want to lynch me, they're dumb, but if that's going to be the trend, then do it so I can claim, you can realize that I'm definitely town, and we still have time to redirect elsewhere.In post 4474, Boem_u_dusi wrote:We have around 5 days left. This vote is probably pointless because he can just pop in and claim some crap.
Let's just rope somebody and get on to D3, my patience is running out.In post 4511, podoboq wrote:By that logic, what wagon isn't pointless? One on somebody's who has already claimed?In post 4509, Boem_u_dusi wrote:I was talking about implosion?In post 4508, podoboq wrote:That's the idea, yeah. If people want to lynch me, they're dumb, but if that's going to be the trend, then do it so I can claim, you can realize that I'm definitely town, and we still have time to redirect elsewhere.In post 4474, Boem_u_dusi wrote:We have around 5 days left. This vote is probably pointless because he can just pop in and claim some crap.
Agreed.In post 4512, Boem_u_dusi wrote:Let's just rope somebody and get on to D3, my patience is running out.In post 4511, podoboq wrote:By that logic, what wagon isn't pointless? One on somebody's who has already claimed?In post 4509, Boem_u_dusi wrote:I was talking about implosion?In post 4508, podoboq wrote:That's the idea, yeah. If people want to lynch me, they're dumb, but if that's going to be the trend, then do it so I can claim, you can realize that I'm definitely town, and we still have time to redirect elsewhere.In post 4474, Boem_u_dusi wrote:We have around 5 days left. This vote is probably pointless because he can just pop in and claim some crap.
By the way, that's the third VT claim. Titus and shannon have also claimed VT, just to remind everyone.In post 4360, Boem_u_dusi wrote:I claim Vanilla Townie.In post 4357, Dunnstral wrote:Yeah uh I didn't realize we were in role madness btw; everyone is either a pr or softing one it feels like or some negative utility role
It is, in fact, true.In post 4393, Dunnstral wrote:Or are you saying "named townie isn't explicitely normal"
Because that's just untrue
Where the hell did I say this. I said that there are all three (backup nurse, nurse, doctor). I believe Mirhawk's claim. As I've said, I still think it's possible that he's scum (specifically a mafia doctor) but it's significantly less likely. I honestly have no idea how you got this from what I've posted.In post 4403, Airick10 wrote:This is interesting discussion as this is only speculation it being a closed game, so I don't want to read too much into this and I think it's quite a challenge to try and figure that out blind. But a couple questions.In post 4386, Almost50 wrote:Well, we don't KNOW there isn't a deputy (or a Cop with no deputy for that matter). The former become "already done" in response to your suggestion, while the latter becomes "no can do".In post 4372, implosion wrote:because what moderator in their right mind would conceive of the idea of a backup nurse without a nurse
if they were going for something like that they would just put a nurse without a doctor or a deputy without a cop. Those are sort of standby choices (along with miller) for moderators looking to add a named townie to a setup. They wouldn't think of it.
Now as for the doctor -and precisely for our case here in this game- I guess the setup needed one. So, I'm MERELY SPECULATING- that either a Cop OR a Deputy is in play and thus the mod got cornered between including a Backup Nurse w/o there being a Nurse or adding a Backup Deputy.
Obviously I'm NOT an expert in setup balancing (I only modded one game that had a fixed standard open setup and still somehow managed to slip up to confirm TWO players roles, so I'll just shut up now!)
- Implosion, I agree that adding a backup nurse or deputy without a nurse or deputy is pretty crazy. So are you saying if there is a backup nurse, there can only be a nurse without a doctor? What would a nurse be able to do without a doctor? And with this logic, do you believe Mirhawk's/Varsoon's claims?
This is strictly wrong on mafiascum; miller without a cop is perfectly valid in normal games, specifically so that you can't infer the presence of a cop from the presence of a miller. See the above link. It also happens in practice.In post 4505, podoboq wrote:2) Setup spec on my part. There needs to be a cop to justify Miller, though, so going down this PR rabbit hole has made the claim look a little worse.In post 4351, Dunnstral wrote:podoboq, do you have a special reason to trust beeboy's miller claim as well? Just wondering
Emphasis :3In post 4515, Zachstralkita wrote:Podo according to VC you were already voting Titus? Was that vote for emphasis or did you just want to feel special?
I'm gonna need this Titus wagon to cease and desist
I misspoke. There needs to be a Cop to Justify Miller, but we can have a Miller without that kind of justification, and it can act as just a named townie. I know Millers can exist without cops, (and nurses without docs, etc), but a Miller without a Cop is more suspicious to me, because I think itIn post 4517, implosion wrote:This is strictly wrong on mafiascum; miller without a cop is perfectly valid in normal games, specifically so that you can't infer the presence of a cop from the presence of a miller. See the above link. It also happens in practice.In post 4505, podoboq wrote:2) Setup spec on my part. There needs to be a cop to justify Miller, though, so going down this PR rabbit hole has made the claim look a little worse.In post 4351, Dunnstral wrote:podoboq, do you have a special reason to trust beeboy's miller claim as well? Just wondering
That Titus wagon is fueled by scum.In post 4515, Zachstralkita wrote:Podo according to VC you were already voting Titus? Was that vote for emphasis or did you just want to feel special?
I'm gonna need this Titus wagon to cease and desist