Mafiascum.net

Kind of back, but how did this turbo wagon happen on Rude? And Icerint is getting a pass?

I will have to catch up later.

I'm about a billion pages behind. I had an explosion of IRL stuff, but I'm here.....kinda.....I guess. I'm also glad to have some stuff to read because I hope my absence gave some space for others to speak.

Anyways, reading through starting way back around page 152 to the bottom of 160.

Really glad to see the engagement from Grendel.

In post 3778, a2rudeboy wrote:Star- Was it back around 629, where NPOM had dropped a read about A50 based on a current game, and then we talked about modkilling, and he used us trying to get him modkilled as a way to SR? This discussion lasted all the way to post 810 or so by the way.

Yeah, I think it was the modkill discussion that was reminding me of it. Just let the mod do their job.

In post 3795, davesaz wrote:Well, that was very weird. I looked through TD's ISO and specifically tracked the Starbuck progression, and it's basically not a progression. It resembles a garden hose with a high pressure nozzle, on full blast, and not being held down. I honestly don't know what to think about that.

Pedit: He's quite honest about it too. Still don't know what to think about it.

hE cHaNgEs HiS mInD a LoT oR sOmEtHiNg. No, he's a freight train barreling through the tunnel.

In post 3824, Grendel wrote:Reading through Leia Im honestly having a hard time distinishing her real pushes from her jokes.

I thought her entire presence in the game was a joke, so you're in a better place than I was.

In post 3846, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 3836, a2rudeboy wrote:My vote for Lavender is a combination of her lurking, beetlejuicing, prodging, and promising content without delivering (with one notable exception). Are these scum-tells? Not in themselves

In my book, they are scum tells.

+1.

In post 3920, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 3900, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Not to mention DGB self voted and missed the NK. Seems like she's counting on help from her scummates.

I don’t think she really needs that sort of help, she’s a seasoned veteran of mafia

+1


This back and forth between BEF and dave on 158 feels very mountain out of a molehill from dave. I'm still feeling TvT after that, though.


Iec's 3976 is similar to how I've been feeling regarding DGB. He laid it out perfectly. I remember lots of antagonizing and engagement when she's town from games back in my heyday (my join date till like 2014 time frame). It's also interesting that Iec quoted her response (3978) to my question about her game play around this topic. I'm curious to see her retaliation to this dastardly attempt.

In post 3996, Galron wrote:3. Chkflip and pooky are connected somehow. I haven't seen them try to solve each other.

I've been feeling something there, too, and have been meaning to bring it up. I appreciate Chk's quick response to it in 3997. Feels real.

As scummy as Iecerint's explanation of his rudeboy's vote may be, i am still vig'ing NPOM. I trust you'll do the right thing and shred Iecerint before end game.

In post 4495, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:r we supposed to wagon really slowly when we r super close to deadline

We were supposed to hammer Iecerint.

Don't gimme that BS, Pooky.

if you shoot NPOM tonight you will have my vote for Ice Ice Tomm

We spent 4-5 excruciating days trying to extract a vanilla claim from Iecerint, a vanilla claim which was apparently so blindingly amazing and credible that some players stopped dead and their tracks, turned around and started running towards some easy shred bait that they could maul with scant examination, under the guise of a looming deadline.

In post 4504, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:if you shoot NPOM tonight you will have my vote for Ice Ice Tomm

I don't believe you but OK

Iec- In regards to "tunneling" NPOM... When i voted him today, it ramped up a wagon, because a lot of people were not voting NPOM in part because of what I had done D1 and D2. Once that gravy train moved on, I voted elsewhere and haven't gone back (other than saying i would support the wagon if it again looked like it was happening). Explain how I've tunneled NPOM.

In post 4505, DrippingGoofball wrote:We spent 4-5 excruciating days trying to extract a vanilla claim from Iecerint, a vanilla claim which was apparently so blindingly amazing and credible that some players stopped dead and their tracks, turned around and started running towards some easy shred bait that they could maul with scant examination, under the guise of a looming deadline.

I legit had to go back and ISO Iec, because I had even forgotten he claimed. Because the claim was so nothing. And now everyone is apparently super TRing him based off of it.

Iecerint tunneled on NPOM and then tunneled on me, so I would take his accusations with a scummy grain of salt.

Yeah... VOTE: iec

I feel increasingly good about this.

Chkflip RUSHED to flip another wagon based on a super powered up vanilla claim LOL.

Chkflip, who was unphased with my power role hints and claim... was immediately convinced by a vanilla claim.

DGB and Rude being on the iec wagon reinforces iec's towniness.

In post 4505, DrippingGoofball wrote:We spent 4-5 excruciating days trying to extract a vanilla claim from Iecerint, a vanilla claim which was apparently so blindingly amazing and credible that some players stopped dead and their tracks, turned around and started running towards some easy shred bait that they could maul with scant examination, under the guise of a looming deadline.

In post 4508, a2rudeboy wrote:

In post 4505, DrippingGoofball wrote:We spent 4-5 excruciating days trying to extract a vanilla claim from Iecerint, a vanilla claim which was apparently so blindingly amazing and credible that some players stopped dead and their tracks, turned around and started running towards some easy shred bait that they could maul with scant examination, under the guise of a looming deadline.

I legit had to go back and ISO Iec, because I had even forgotten he claimed. Because the claim was so nothing. And now everyone is apparently super TRing him based off of it.

Just to be clear; I'm neutral on the claim. I just think momentum is not in favor of voting out Iecerint, as the struggle to get a claim showed. I still think Iece is scummy but it's not worth my time to try and force that shred imo. I'd rather vote out someone who seems scummy and also whose shred helps the momentum to not skew in a way that I think hurts the game.

In post 4511, DrippingGoofball wrote:Chkflip RUSHED to flip another wagon based on a super powered up vanilla claim LOL.

Chkflip, who was unphased with my power role hints and claim... was immediately convinced by a vanilla claim.

Here we go again.

I sincerely hope one of us is dead tomorrow so I don't have to deal with this bi-polar level posting from you.

He's town

Oh wait he's voting me hes scum

Oh wait he changed his mind and is voting with me hes town

He derailed my preferred wagon! Scumz0rz!

Get a fucking grip on reality.

Everyone will forget about this tomorrow as they walk away from my shredded remains, but iecerint, chkflip, Pooky, will need a closer look. They are super linked. It's almost too much of a scum Dream Team to be true, there has got to be a lurksack in the lot, look again at Lavender who and who is endorsing her as town. By memory it was Pooky and chkflip but I could be wrong. I am sweating a publishing deadline right now and don't have time to check. I shouldn't even be typing this right now

In post 4514, chkflip wrote:

In post 4511, DrippingGoofball wrote:Chkflip RUSHED to flip another wagon based on a super powered up vanilla claim LOL.

Chkflip, who was unphased with my power role hints and claim... was immediately convinced by a vanilla claim.

Here we go again.

I sincerely hope one of us is dead tomorrow so I don't have to deal with this bi-polar level posting from you.

He's town

Oh wait he's voting me hes scum

Oh wait he changed his mind and is voting with me hes town

He derailed my preferred wagon! Scumz0rz!

Get a fucking grip on reality.

Bark bark

Iecerint has more votes, if you want momentum.

Iecerint claim stalled a vanilla claim for crying out loud.

And I will not vote rudeboy.

It's old and I expect more and better from you.

I miss the days when you posted like Empking.

Why do you think you'll be shredded DGB?

In post 4512, NoPowerOverMe wrote:DGB and Rude being on the iec wagon reinforces iec's towniness.

Says the guy who knows I am going to vig him and insists on calling me scum.

In post 4519, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Why do you think you'll be shredded DGB?

I will be nightkilled, duh.

In post 4517, DrippingGoofball wrote:

@GammaEmerald

Iecerint has more votes, if you want momentum.

Iecerint claim stalled a vanilla claim for crying out loud.

And I will not vote rudeboy.

I thought rude's vote put it back even?

I know no such thing. Your chances of actually having a shot are low unless you mean the scum shot.

Top of 161 to Bottom of 168

Digging DGB's Iec case all through this page. Looking at the analysis of Iec's read on me makes me feel like I've been buddy-ed and I'm a not as confident on a town!Iec as I thought. However, I think Iec has good points in regards to DGB, too. One of DGB/Iec might be scum or they are doing a helluva performance of distancing.

In post 4002, Grendel wrote:I think the easiest solution is if in everybody's next post we out a pool of up to three players we are willing to flip, and then place a vote on one of them.

At this point, I could do a TD or rude shred.

Lavender has been more coherent, but the active lurking is what's getting me now. She's paying attention, hence the Beetlejuicing, but choosing not to engage.

In post 4018, Galron wrote:In B4 npom votes iecerint.

TD's OMGUS of Grendel in 4030 shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.


While I think the Iec wagon is worthwhile, the quick hops onto it, on page 162, by rude and BEF feel opportunistic and NPOM's 4048 with his inclination of DGB!scum is curious.

In post 4050, NoPowerOverMe wrote:The only wagons I would join at this point are DGB, TD, and Drew. So stop being rediculous.

Why?

In post 4078, davesaz wrote:I actually like DGB's case more, and I don't disagree with "wanting to have time on a computer" by itself. The timing of when she had time is what's fishy.

Are you really questioning the convenience of when she could find IRL time on a computer? That's NAI and WIFOM AF.

In post 4112, Gamma Emerald wrote:@Galron, Starbuck, pisskop: thoughts on the Iecerint wagon?

I've commented on it during my read, but if you have a specific question, let me know.

In post 4117, Galron wrote:I didn't like how dave came off the last three pages.

Yeah, I'm feeling similarly.

In post 4120, chkflip wrote:Wild concept, I'm aware, but like... how do most players have twice your post count? You, Iec, Galron, and ESPECIALLY Lavender... that's four too many lurkfucks in a game this size.

+ motherfucking 1


And then here comes Iec with 4136, which I think is a pretty solid defense. Not caring for dave's dismissive vote right after.

In post 4140, Gamma Emerald wrote:the amount of scare caps in that iec post is actually annoying

I use caps to emphasize, not scare. I'm not liking your dismissiveness here either.


OOOOOH, CHK'S UNVOTE IN 4144 IS SO TOWN IT FUCKING HURTS.

And suddenly HERE'S LAAAAAAAAAVENDER.

In post 4161, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Do you think gender bias is in play here?

The fuck is this?