Mafiascum.net

In post 4485, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 4029, DkKoba wrote:unless i did indeed hit scum pr(which i hope i didnt bc it means my reads are garbo lol)

Missed this last night, but didn't Koba later claim that DGB verified the message in her early posts? If DGB did, then koba would know at that point they had not hit a power role.

This means Mark is more likely to flip town here and DGB looks scummier if so.

In post 4512, VP Baltar wrote:Lemme guess, FL will claim he tried to confirm to Andres

In post 4500, VP Baltar wrote:VOTE: Koba

In post 4501, DkKoba wrote:oh fuck off

In post 4502, DkKoba wrote:im town

In post 4503, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 4485, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 4029, DkKoba wrote:unless i did indeed hit scum pr(which i hope i didnt bc it means my reads are garbo lol)

Missed this last night, but didn't Koba later claim that DGB verified the message in her early posts? If DGB did, then koba would know at that point they had not hit a power role.

This means Mark is more likely to flip town here and DGB looks scummier if so.

I did confirm by following the instructions DKKOBA gave me.

In post 4504, DrippingGoofball wrote:VOTE: Marky Mark

In post 4505, Glitch wrote:

Official Vote Count 3.02

Resourcefulness is a key to all schools of bending.

---

Official Vote Count 3.02

With 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to eliminate someone.

Marky Mark: 5

(ELIMINATED)

(Andresvmb, Not_Mafia, Flavor Leaf, DkKoba, DrippingGoofball)

DkKoba: 3

(JacksonVirgo, Marky Mark, VP Baltar)

Not Voting: 1

(Almost50)

Deadline

: (expired on 2020-12-02 00:26:14)

Mod Notes: An elimination has been achieved.

[/area]

In post 4506, Glitch wrote:

MARKY MARK HAS BEEN ELIMINATED!

He was a

Town Role Watcher

.

---

Day 3 has ended and Night 3 will now begin.
Night 3 will end in (expired on 2020-11-21 00:21:23).

In post 4507, Glitch wrote:

ANDRESVMB HAS BEEN ELIMINATED!

He was a

Vanilla Townie

.

---

Night 3 has ended and Day 4 will now begin.
Day 4 will end in (expired on 2020-12-05 00:18:05).

In post 4508, Glitch wrote:

Official Vote Count 4.00

Fire Lord Ozai was the second firebender to demonstrate his ability to fly using his firebending. The unprecedented technique had only been demonstrated once before by his prodigy daughter, Princess Azula. In this scene, the power of Ozai's firebending is multiplied tenfold, as Sozin's comet, a comet that passes through Earth's atmosphere once per century, neared. This comet gave firebenders unbelievable strength. It is unknown whether Ozai's ability to use his firebending was restricted to the time when the comet was near and boosting the firebenders' bending, or if it was a skill he simply developed close to the end of the timeline of the show's history and was able to use outside of that time. Regardless, the answer would never be discovered as Avatar Aang used a new technique of bending the energy within himself and others to take away Firelord Ozai's firebending permanently.

---

Official Vote Count 4.00

With 7 votes in play, it takes 4 to eliminate someone.

Not Voting: 7

(Almost50, Not_Mafia, Flavor Leaf, DkKoba, DrippingGoofball, JacksonVirgo, VP Baltar)

Deadline

: (expired on 2020-12-05 00:18:05)

Mod Notes: Day 4 has begun!

[/area]

In post 4509, JacksonVirgo wrote:Sup

VOTE: Koba

In post 4510, JacksonVirgo wrote:Infinity's and all detective checks are useless to us now that we know Koba would have done the kill every night up 'til now.

In post 4511, VP Baltar wrote:VOTE: Koba

New town squad is me and Jackson. FL is probably scum too, but we will see if anyone backs his FN claim now.

In post 4512, VP Baltar wrote:Lemme guess, FL will claim he tried to confirm to Andres

In post 4513, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 4512, VP Baltar wrote:Lemme guess, FL will claim he tried to confirm to Andres

That's what I'm expecting yeah.

FL looks even worse when they were softing Loyal when they weren't

In post 4403, Not_Mafia wrote:VP/Marky/Andres

In post 4406, Not_Mafia wrote:

In post 4401, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 4396, Flavor Leaf wrote:Not Mafia is trolling VP before your eyes, how is he not agreeing?

I wouldn't say trolling so much as not answering why he wouldn't suspect mark immediately on D2 given it would be a direct conflict with his own claimed role. Also, why not protect Infinity last night since he was town reading them and scum reading me?

I respect the temerity of swimming against the inevitable tide

In post 4408, Not_Mafia wrote:

In post 4405, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 4404, DkKoba wrote:you think town!NM ever does the optimal move?

that's some pretty shit play though. As opposed to a Marky-NM scum pair, which makes a lot more sense.

I don't have experience with NM though.

lol now he's trying to tie me to Marky instead

In post 4409, Not_Mafia wrote:I'm enjoying VP flailing too much to hammer right now

In post 251, Marky Mark wrote:Thank you mod for the birthday wishes, it is my honour to spend the dying minutes of it catching up with all of you and this game.

So after trying to catch up with everything and filter out all the meta discussion for games I haven't played in, Geraint hasn't given me any reason to stop voting him - I can understand the busyness on his part and hopefully we will get a chance to hear his take on things soon.

In post 226, Andresvmb wrote:Alright I’m just going to put this out there. @Koba I’m not getting Townyvibes from you. I really didn’t like your attempt at a derp clear with the Scum not having Day Talk. In fact, anybody who made a direct reference to that should be under some suspicion (I don’t really have a read on VPB but I also noticed a reference there from him). Until it was highlighted, I didn’t even check whether this was the case. Yes, I initially assumed that Scum could speak privately during the day. But the Scum are far more likely to have wanted to communicate and strategize early, only to realize that they couldn’t (as included in the rules). So anybody who realized this probably felt it would be something they could use to clear themselves by making a point out of it. Paranoid? Perhaps. But something to think about.

I don't think this logic really works and I think you're reading way too much into this. I do think that dk seems to be going pretty strong on shelly on earlier pages based on her posts in

this

game - I'll leave the meta assessments for people who know her better - but the angle andres takes over the whole daytalk thing seems fairly contrived.

TBQH I've skim-read the thread today after a long day at work but will go through people's ISOs etc more methodically when time allows - probs my day off on Monday. I did, however, enjoy the runescape meme. Have a good night all

In post 348, Marky Mark wrote:Afternoon all, got off work early

Ref people asking why Geraint wagon is a thing:

In post 254, shellyc wrote:sup whats the gerain wagon all about

catching up now

btw the andres SR was kinda a meme so UNVOTE: Andres

In post 331, shellyc wrote:oh wait i misunderstood that

you're telling me to stop saving gerain
gerain's iso is basically the same as all the other lurker isos, i completely don't get this cw at all
confidence in scumflip when we're 48 hours into d1 cant plausibly come from town imo

In post 346, geraintm wrote:

In post 256, shellyc wrote:the gerain wagon seems to be of someone whos low activity + made a weird maths thingy in rvs

don't get how that is scummy at all
this is a trash cw

I am amused that people find my method of generating a random vote, which i have done in many previous games including games which people in this have been in, has caused such a fuss.
I vote whomever posts that many number posts after mine

I'm not gonna speak for others who find him scummy (still have not seen a justification from VP for his vote and would like to see one) but its the following from me:

In post 105, geraintm wrote:

In post 73, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 36, NDMath wrote:VOTE: shelleyc

In post 33, Marky Mark wrote:VOTE: NDMath

<insert hilarious quip here about the moral and grammatical superiority of British English 'maths' to the Americanism of 'math'>

<'Englishes'. Math is sometimes considered a language, and one doesn't pluralize languages.>

In post 35, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 34, geraintm wrote:Hello all. I can do maths. 2+1+7+3=13

Is this a soft?

Probably. 7*7-7=42

In post 34, geraintm wrote:Hello all. I can do maths. 2+1+7+3=13

I would eliminate this slot if all I had was the information we have right now.

Why? Are you jealous of my addition abilities?

The jokey brush-off of the suspicion rather than engaging more meaningfully is a classic deflection move. Furthermore, have not had anything meaningful from the slot since in terms of content/analysis/reads so that's why my vote went there and is still very happily there.

In other news...

I'm not sure what DK's posting frequency has been like in other games - there's a decent amount of proactivity in there but also a lot of fluff. Scum me is all about stacking the post count high to make it more of a faff for the town to pick up the important stuff, so I could totally see someone pulling this as a scum move.

In post 248, DkKoba wrote:VOTE: jackson ill explain in a bit when i can type it up. I believe i hinted at this move earlier but i was hoping to see more info before i transitioned over

I don't think you ever did explain this - yes, you've mentioned the "scumclaim" in #296 but that was way after this post so clearly not the original reason for the post.

Of what we've had so far, Infinity sticks out as a TR for generally solid analysis in their posts.

Stating the obvious, but excited to see what our replacement's take on all of this is and hopefully hear more from TayTay and Maths too I appreciate how rich this is coming from me with my equally low levels of activity

In post 350, Marky Mark wrote:Which particular part of the above do you feel is being misrepped?

Also interesting format of response - if I was factually incorrect in what I was saying about you surely the more straightforward thing to do would be to disprove/correct me rather than just throw words like misrep my way and see what sticks?

In post 367, Marky Mark wrote:

In post 365, DkKoba wrote:

In post 350, Marky Mark wrote:Which particular part of the above do you feel is being misrepped?

Also interesting format of response - if I was factually incorrect in what I was saying about you surely the more straightforward thing to do would be to disprove/correct me rather than just throw words like misrep my way and see what sticks?

What are you on about? U said something untrue idc if u wanna believe it or not its on u if you trust me lmao??

You were saying that I was misrepping you without giving explaining how. You still haven't explained what I've actually said that you think is a misrep - I'd like to know please as currently you are just throwing unsubstantiated shade .

I just find all of this a bit odd because if it was the other way around and you were saying that I said XYZ and I hadn't, then my default reaction would be to just correct you rather than making some opaque statement.

In post 4514, DkKoba wrote:HELLO ALL I AM TOWN I WILL PROVE IT SHORTLY