Mafiascum.net

If we have a vig that’s 1shot or whatever then they should have shot N_M.
If they are town they should claim. Then we have 5 confirmed town essentially. There’s no way in hell scum would win in that scenario.

In post 4499, Andresvmb wrote:Those points are tied together. If the Vig is 3p, that’s the first execution in ELo with 4 flipped Scum and the game not over. No?

If they make it that far without the Scum shooting them in revenge. Which lets face it, they would. How do I know that? Because I would.

In post 4499, Andresvmb wrote:Those points are tied together. If the Vig is 3p, that’s the first execution in ELo with 4 flipped Scum and the game not over. No?

There can’t be a Vig.

It can only be a serial killer if it’s third party.

Either way i think Vax is a good lim because of how scummy their argumentation has been.

In post 4502, BBmolla wrote:

In post 4499, Andresvmb wrote:Those points are tied together. If the Vig is 3p, that’s the first execution in ELo with 4 flipped Scum and the game not over. No?

There can’t be a Vig.

It can only be a serial killer if it’s third party.

Yeah I mean you get what I mean. You’re like splitting hairs. Fight the logic behind the argument not the way it’s made.

Which as far as I’m aware has compulsive kills

What’s a plausible theory as to how these kills were blocked?

I’m just saying it’s a leap of logic

I’ve been calling for Vax’s execution for a while. So I WILL vote there. It’s just a question of whether enough of the Conf Town want the day to end now. I can also just let Mom take all the glory and vote haha I don’t really care.

In post 4505, BBmolla wrote:Which as far as I’m aware has compulsive kills

What’s a plausible theory as to how these kills were blocked?

This is a valid point actually. I don’t know whether the SK has compulsive kills. I also don’t know how 3p roles are constructed in this forum at all. So I can’t really comment on this.

But if the Vig *doesn’t* have to claim, and they want to take more shots, then that would be a good reason not to out.

In post 4509, Andresvmb wrote:But if the Vig *doesn’t* have to claim, and they want to take more shots, then that would be a good reason not to out.

Yep that is a reasonable assumption and I’ve never disputed it

In post 4505, BBmolla wrote:Which as far as I’m aware has compulsive kills

What’s a plausible theory as to how these kills were blocked?

What do you mean.
Not even mafia has compulsive kills.

In post 4510, BBmolla wrote:

In post 4509, Andresvmb wrote:But if the Vig *doesn’t* have to claim, and they want to take more shots, then that would be a good reason not to out.

Yep that is a reasonable assumption and I’ve never disputed it

Well that makes it easy.
Vote Vax/Hayker/Molla to win the game.

In post 4511, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 4505, BBmolla wrote:Which as far as I’m aware has compulsive kills

What’s a plausible theory as to how these kills were blocked?

What do you mean.
Not even mafia has compulsive kills.

In my experience SK kills are compulsive but it doesn’t look hard enforced so I guess if we’re under the assumption kills aren’t compulsive I can see the leap in logic

If it’s Hayker/Vax than obviously I’m content I just doubt that

In post 4512, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 4510, BBmolla wrote:

In post 4509, Andresvmb wrote:But if the Vig *doesn’t* have to claim, and they want to take more shots, then that would be a good reason not to out.

Yep that is a reasonable assumption and I’ve never disputed it

Well that makes it easy.
Vote Vax/Hayker/Molla to win the game.

This is false. Not even just false, it's bad. I'm busy I'll be on later, or hammer me and find out.

In post 4212, Vaxkiller wrote:

In post 4210, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 4207, Vaxkiller wrote:Damnit. My theory is titus flips TOWN. SCum stayed off the wagon.

If she's town, why would scum avoid that wagon?

Because they wanted to keep her around because she was off target. If she was on target she would have been NK'd

In post 4213, Vaxkiller wrote:

In post 4212, Vaxkiller wrote:

In post 4210, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 4207, Vaxkiller wrote:Damnit. My theory is titus flips TOWN. SCum stayed off the wagon.

If she's town, why would scum avoid that wagon?

Because they wanted to keep her around because she was off target. If she was on target she would have been NK'd

Hell, maybe shes ON TARGET, but no one believes her.

This was before Titus flipped yeah? That second post looks like a big giveaway to me. Like you couldn’t have known at that stage that Titus was way off. Right? So this looks like one of those times where you get self-conscious about the first theory you threw out there (because it reveals too much) and you correct it with a follow up post that basically goes against the first one (I’ve done this as Scum, I know the feeling). Which now that I read it back is just like saying well anything could happen with Titus but they’re Town so whatever reason you can think of as to why Scum stayed off, that’s why. But we know now that actually the first post was entirely true based on the flips and information we have.

I guess what I’m trying to say is, if you’re going to say that a particular solve is false or bad, you might want to actually explain what you’re thinking. Because just being like well hammer me then and find out isn’t convincing.

In post 4400, Vaxkiller wrote:EE or andres

Like you are strictly at Norwegian at this point in a game with clearly more Scum than that. So please, elaborate.

It’s quite obvious that scum were on the sidelines for the Titus elimination and now they are harping on the: "town can’t all be on a wagon. Impossible lol" false reasoning to secure more mislims.

Vax was blatantly trying to paint Gamma’s defense of me like he was my scum partner for gods sake.

In post 4471, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don’t have more to say so i’m fine with it.
Yeet Vax.

Why do you keep on doing this? You keep wanting to but in on every conversation to be relevant or something

UNVOTE:

I need a moment

In post 4521, Momrangal wrote:

In post 4471, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don’t have more to say so i’m fine with it.
Yeet Vax.

Why do you keep on doing this? You keep wanting to but in on every conversation to be relevant or something

That's just me wanting to get my five cents out.
I'm a bit hyperactive ok.

In post 4492, NorwegianboyEE wrote:To argue that i’m insane to believe it could be third party is literally TMI’ing that there are 4 scum.

I aefued the same thing but sure, ok. I probably have too much information myself