Mafiascum.net

OK, I did and it's because pp looked like the only viable alternative but I wasn't happy about it so I switched to tbg shortly after, texcat was never viable yesterday and I didn't even have my sights on them

In post 4523, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 4518, Tchill13 wrote:

In post 4513, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 4511, Tchill13 wrote:@dunn lets move on. Why Texcat over PP or TBG today? When the fake doc claim happened you voted those players. Why no push this day phase?

PP looks like the counter wagon and no I don't remember voting him

TBG was on the scum wagon so I'm not interested in voting him, also it looked like the only non-pp alternative to yesterday

so you'd rather lynch womeone who stalled the wagon than manybe someone who bussed? Did Texcat look like he stalled more so than the others i just listed? Brawler, Scionness...

I'm voting Texcat because I feel like they are scummy

Stalling isn't scummy because they still get lynched in the end

but they tried to stop a scum lynch? How is that not scummy? To try and stop a scum lynch in any form is pretty scummy imo

In post 4525, Dunnstral wrote:OK, I did and it's because pp looked like the only viable alternative but I wasn't happy about it so I switched to tbg shortly after, texcat was never viable yesterday and I didn't even have my sights on them

he's not viable atm but your vote stays now?

you forgot that you made a vote you felt terrible about? Which means you literally voted PP just to vote someone else.

In post 3242, Dunnstral wrote:What's wrong with you guys? I don't remember wheme being so scummy that we ignore good strategy and just lynch him through a doctor claim, I was under the impression that this was basically a lurker/lynchbait day.

Wheme isn't scummy around hammer, why would mafia claim dumb protect targets

If Wheme is mafia he gets caught later and we lynch him over any other doc claim if it comes to it

If we lynch doctor we lose our way to protect all these mason/ic that prematurely claimed (more bad town play but nothing I could do about it)

VOTE: PenguinPower

that last line is the only reason he fake claimed a DOC of all things. I would imagine scum even came together to decide if he should fake claim and what he should fake claim.

So for me to see YOU buy that reasoning so willingly EVEN BRING THAT POINT UP, scramble to vote anyone else, then forget about those 2 pushes the next day phase...

tells me you're probably scum. no matter what your meta is.

I already explained my current stance on voting so no to whatever you're trying to get me to say

In post 4028, texcat wrote:I'm pretty sure scum is going to have to kill Ausuka before endgame.

You know this may be strange but I'm thinking back on this.

I'm probably in conspiracy theory mode here but could this be a slip?

Like, think about Wheme's claim. As soon as he claimed doctor, he was dead. Otherwise they have to leave Ausuka alive until endgame. So I wonder if in Scum chat they decided at some point they had to bus hard BECAUSE the doctor claim actually fucked them if he survived the wagon? If they ever decided they needed to kill Ausuka, wheme gets lynched immediately anyway, so why not bus him hard earlier to gain those "on the wagon" points?

I kinda want to look back at who joined the wagon after the claim.

Why do I have like a 99% thought that Gamma joined the wagon after claim. Need to reread that part in context tomorrow morning.

texcat+gamma anyone?

"stalling isn't scummy because he still go lynched"??? what the heck is that?

It's scummy BECAUSE HE FLIPPED SCUM. The stallers did not want him to flip.

In post 4529, Dunnstral wrote:I already explained my current stance on voting so no to whatever you're trying to get me to say

im not trying to get you to say anything. Your stance on texcat has nothing to do with this next ppoint.

You're vote on PP was so terrible you forgot it and voted someone else. You said it was a vote you felt bad about. Which means you voted PP just to vote someone else other than wheme.

looking like dunn, lalendra, gamma, scionness, vax.

of course idk the names of the lurkers but im sure there's a scum in there too.

I owuldn't be surprised if 2 scum hopped on PP early out of lalendra, wheme, mylo to get that PP wagon growing.

In post 4532, Tchill13 wrote:Your stance on texcat has nothing to do with this next ppoint.

Then don't ask me about my stance on texcat

Which one is the lurker scum?

14. Lovebird Davesaz Frozen Angel Skygazer
17. Andriod18 Ankamius
23. Myloninja13

Is anyone else considered a lurker at this point outside these three?

I have to understand that to know if you're progression from wheme to PP to TBG to texcat is justified


It's not. Clearly you refuse to work with town to achieve a lynch by stating you will remain on texcat regardless. Someone you did not vote when you unvoted wheme. Someone you did not pursue when you stated wheme could protect the claimed masons.

Which was the whole point of the DOC claim. This did not stick at all. Instead this was looked over. The fact you pointed that out so quickly makes me feel better about you being scum.

Wheme claims DOC, dunn points that out immediately... Sounds like teamwork to me.

In post 4536, Krazy wrote:Which one is the lurker scum?

14. Lovebird Davesaz Frozen Angel Skygazer
17. Andriod18 Ankamius
23. Myloninja13

Is anyone else considered a lurker at this point outside these three?

We got enough scum to deal with to worry about lurkers later. An investigative using actions in those slots would be beneficial because imo we have all the info we need based on how so many acted concerning wheme.

In post 4537, Tchill13 wrote:Clearly you refuse to work with town to achieve a lynch by stating you will remain on texcat regardless.

Go back and read where I said I'd vote elsewhere then we can talk, not going to talk in circles though

Well clearly some people disagree since Mylo was a #2 wagon today but the other two weren't. I guess I went through a fair chunk of today kinda going "why Mylo but not FA (now sky)"? One of the reasons that wagon kind of made my skin crawl. I think you were also saying you liked Mylo as a top 2 earlier. Was that just policy and you didn't care which lurker?

In post 4539, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 4537, Tchill13 wrote:Clearly you refuse to work with town to achieve a lynch by stating you will remain on texcat regardless.

Go back and read where I said I'd vote elsewhere then we can talk, not going to talk in circles though

OK don't talk in circles. Dispute the case I just laid against you.

Correct. Policy and I didn't care.

The issue is we actually have enough content here to care. There's 5+ ppl here who are logically suspicious.

In post 4485, JarJarDrinks wrote:

In post 4160, Dunnstral wrote:Also I'm a little interested in a texcat lynch

Dunn what happened between this and now for you to go from a "little interested" to "I will absolutely not move my vote to anyone else unless someone gives me good reason." ???

In post 4486, Dunnstral wrote:You should quote where I said I didn't like lalandra wagon instead

If a viable alternative that I think could be scum pops up I'll vote it, sure

In post 4538, Tchill13 wrote:

In post 4536, Krazy wrote:Which one is the lurker scum?

14. Lovebird Davesaz Frozen Angel Skygazer
17. Andriod18 Ankamius
23. Myloninja13

Is anyone else considered a lurker at this point outside these three?

We got enough scum to deal with to worry about lurkers later. An investigative using actions in those slots would be beneficial because imo we have all the info we need based on how so many acted concerning wheme.

canned response of investigating me is objectively bad etc. etc. yadda yadda yadda

I consider everybody below 200 posts that is not a replacement a luker

Dave/fa/sky are treated sort of like conf town because of Dave's replacement

In post 4545, Scioness Sajj wrote:I consider everybody below 200 posts that is not a replacement a luker

Well that's just not true/the bar is too high to be reasonable

Is it? Idk I consider myself a lurker and so everybody also below my post count is also a lurker

Is really 200 post on day 3 in 25 people game unreasonable?

In post 4533, Tchill13 wrote:looking like dunn, lalendra, gamma, scionness, vax.

Nice. Pretty close to the grouping I posted earlier today.

I think I just have Creature in for Dunnstral.