Page 183 of 237

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:38 am
by Yukari Yakumo
VC 4.02
GoodCop_BadCop (L-4):
Jaqen Hghar | Saki | ActionDan
Saki (L-6):
GoodCop_BadCop
bubbajack8 (L-2):
pieguyn | Varsoon | Sakura Hana | Katarina LeBlanc | bubbajack8

Not Voting:
zMuffinMan, DisCode, Nachomamma8, Mac

With 13 alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.

The deadline is March 1st, 10:45 AM EST.
Deadline: (expired on 2014-03-01 10:45:00)

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:42 am
by GoodCop_BadCop
Bubba, whats your theory on why Jaqen got a SK result from investigating you?

~GC

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 am
by pieguyn
Prohawk get Cabd in here

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 7:33 am
by GoodCop_BadCop
Already sent the word back when you asked about our claim

~GC

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:02 am
by Yukari Yakumo
notscience replaces Mac.

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:04 am
by notscience
5 word explanation of bubba wagon go

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:05 am
by zMuffinMan
IC rolecopped him - got SK

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:17 am
by notscience
Why are there light and dark green names in the OP

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:26 am
by zMuffinMan
gif worst mod?

the dark green names are last night's deaths - it could just be an error on his part - at least i don't think it has special meaning

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:45 am
by Yukari Yakumo
In post 4557, notscience wrote:Why are there light and dark green names in the OP
Recently I learned that "green" is shorter to type than "#00bf00". There is no special meaning behind it.

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:53 am
by Sakura Hana
OMG notscience! <3

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:55 am
by Saki
omg notsci
</3

jk

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 10:26 am
by Jaqen Hghar
In post 4556, zMuffinMan wrote:IC rolecopped him - got SK
A man is less than confident about those results as noted previously. The amount of frustration from bubba causes more doubt.

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 10:31 am
by zMuffinMan
mm, but what i don't get about the frustration is this

there's 2 flipped scum - bubba is screaming that he's "solved" the game by calling AD and i scum - that would imply he either thinks the setup is 17:4 or he's (for lack of a better term) flailing here <- i also think this is possibly a SK slip

also, this response to your claim made no sense to me:
bubba wrote:That's pretty funny. I'm glad you're wary about that. Maf doesnt want to risk killing me so ta-da they do this to me
what would mafia do to him that would make you get a SK result? and why, with a rolecop dead, would they do whatever it is they did to him on the off chance you'd target him?

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 10:47 am
by Katarina LeBlanc
In post 4562, Jaqen Hghar wrote:
In post 4556, zMuffinMan wrote:IC rolecopped him - got SK
A man is less than confident about those results as noted previously. The amount of frustration from bubba causes more doubt.
You copped him.

Why are you doubting it, unless you just flatout lied about it.

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 10:52 am
by notscience
In post 4560, Sakura Hana wrote:OMG notscience! <3
<3 HI SAKURA
In post 4561, Saki wrote:omg notsci
</3

jk
/wrists
In post 4564, Katarina LeBlanc wrote:
In post 4562, Jaqen Hghar wrote:
In post 4556, zMuffinMan wrote:IC rolecopped him - got SK
A man is less than confident about those results as noted previously. The amount of frustration from bubba causes more doubt.
You copped him.

Why are you doubting it, unless you just flatout lied about it.
WHY DIDNT I GET A HI FROM YOU

I also skimmed some early stuff and I've decided I'm ignoring the IC if that's good with everyone. k? k

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 10:56 am
by ActionDan
Lol I totally missed that Waynegg claim

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 10:58 am
by notscience
Hi Dan

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 11:25 am
by ActionDan
Hi new friend

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 11:40 am
by Jaqen Hghar
In post 4564, Katarina LeBlanc wrote:
In post 4562, Jaqen Hghar wrote:
In post 4556, zMuffinMan wrote:IC rolecopped him - got SK
A man is less than confident about those results as noted previously. The amount of frustration from bubba causes more doubt.
You copped him.

Why are you doubting it, unless you just flatout lied about it.
A man sees how roles can be messed with this game. It would be oh so clever to give a man a gift so he could let know someone was guilty, only to have had those results somehow manipulated. A man takes such a gift with a grain of salt.

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 11:41 am
by Katarina LeBlanc
Hi notscience I thought we agreed that we had no relation outside of our
business
.

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 11:42 am
by Katarina LeBlanc
In post 4569, Jaqen Hghar wrote:
In post 4564, Katarina LeBlanc wrote:
In post 4562, Jaqen Hghar wrote:
In post 4556, zMuffinMan wrote:IC rolecopped him - got SK
A man is less than confident about those results as noted previously. The amount of frustration from bubba causes more doubt.
You copped him.

Why are you doubting it, unless you just flatout lied about it.
A man sees how roles can be messed with this game. It would be oh so clever to give a man a gift so he could let know someone was guilty, only to have had those results somehow manipulated. A man takes such a gift with a grain of salt.
So the Kise is scum inventor giving out flawed gifts?

That's actually a possibility.

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 11:44 am
by notscience
In post 4568, ActionDan wrote:Hi new friend
o/
In post 4570, Katarina LeBlanc wrote:Hi notscience I thought we agreed that we had no relation outside of our
business
.
Oh shit, sorry

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 11:54 am
by ActionDan
Seriously though if you got an sk result from the use of your gift, it's much more likely you got the sk than a defective gift. Or at least the guilty should be lynched first because 95 percent of the time he'll really be guilty

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 11:54 am
by Katarina LeBlanc
It's okay baby, I like it when you break the rules.