Mafiascum.net

In post 4573, Dwlee99 wrote:Post 44 in our ISOs say SOS across 3 lines. It's some show reference Roden knew

this is lit

In post 4574, Cephrir wrote:

In post 4569, MathBlade wrote:

In post 4568, Dwlee99 wrote:Discussion was:
Me: I want to be Rose instead of Bernard
Roden: okay
Roden: let's make a complicated crumb <plan here>
Me: wow cool crumb let's do it
Me: wow game move fast
Roden: true but you're townie you're fine
Me: oh you had to claim should I claim now
Roden: some kind of response
Me: okay I'll claim cause everyone says I have to even though I don't want to

Is it antitown to share that plan? To demonstrate you had it?

im curious as to why this is important to you, i can't see how it matters but perhaps you have a reason

mathblade is hard at work "sorting" the claimed mason pair because he has to pretend he's doing something

oh are we still pretending they could both be scum

i dont think anyone thinks that

In post 4576, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 4574, Cephrir wrote:

In post 4569, MathBlade wrote:

In post 4568, Dwlee99 wrote:Discussion was:
Me: I want to be Rose instead of Bernard
Roden: okay
Roden: let's make a complicated crumb <plan here>
Me: wow cool crumb let's do it
Me: wow game move fast
Roden: true but you're townie you're fine
Me: oh you had to claim should I claim now
Roden: some kind of response
Me: okay I'll claim cause everyone says I have to even though I don't want to

Is it antitown to share that plan? To demonstrate you had it?

im curious as to why this is important to you, i can't see how it matters but perhaps you have a reason

mathblade is hard at work "sorting" the claimed mason pair because he has to pretend he's doing something

right that is why i asked

In post 4574, Cephrir wrote:

In post 4569, MathBlade wrote:

In post 4568, Dwlee99 wrote:Discussion was:
Me: I want to be Rose instead of Bernard
Roden: okay
Roden: let's make a complicated crumb <plan here>
Me: wow cool crumb let's do it
Me: wow game move fast
Roden: true but you're townie you're fine
Me: oh you had to claim should I claim now
Roden: some kind of response
Me: okay I'll claim cause everyone says I have to even though I don't want to

Is it antitown to share that plan? To demonstrate you had it?

im curious as to why this is important to you, i can't see how it matters but perhaps you have a reason

It’s more that to me it seems there’s still a lot about Roden and Dwlee. So even though they didn’t crumb if evidence of that plan exists then that can serve as the missing crumb.

In post 4569, MathBlade wrote:

In post 4568, Dwlee99 wrote:Discussion was:
Me: I want to be Rose instead of Bernard
Roden: okay
Roden: let's make a complicated crumb <plan here>
Me: wow cool crumb let's do it
Me: wow game move fast
Roden: true but you're townie you're fine
Me: oh you had to claim should I claim now
Roden: some kind of response
Me: okay I'll claim cause everyone says I have to even though I don't want to

Is it antitown to share that plan? To demonstrate you had it?

I suggested referencing the episode SOS in our 44th posts since it was the was the 44th episode. I ended up claiming on post 43 though lol.

In post 4578, Cephrir wrote:

In post 4576, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 4574, Cephrir wrote:

In post 4569, MathBlade wrote:

In post 4568, Dwlee99 wrote:Discussion was:
Me: I want to be Rose instead of Bernard
Roden: okay
Roden: let's make a complicated crumb <plan here>
Me: wow cool crumb let's do it
Me: wow game move fast
Roden: true but you're townie you're fine
Me: oh you had to claim should I claim now
Roden: some kind of response
Me: okay I'll claim cause everyone says I have to even though I don't want to

Is it antitown to share that plan? To demonstrate you had it?

im curious as to why this is important to you, i can't see how it matters but perhaps you have a reason

mathblade is hard at work "sorting" the claimed mason pair because he has to pretend he's doing something

right that is why i asked

bro you literally asking a bank robber why they're looting a vault

In post 4577, Cephrir wrote:oh are we still pretending they could both be scum

i dont think anyone thinks that

It seems that’s still the case so I am trying to demonstrate that Roden+Dwlee is unlikely

In post 4580, Roden wrote:

In post 4569, MathBlade wrote:

In post 4568, Dwlee99 wrote:Discussion was:
Me: I want to be Rose instead of Bernard
Roden: okay
Roden: let's make a complicated crumb <plan here>
Me: wow cool crumb let's do it
Me: wow game move fast
Roden: true but you're townie you're fine
Me: oh you had to claim should I claim now
Roden: some kind of response
Me: okay I'll claim cause everyone says I have to even though I don't want to

Is it antitown to share that plan? To demonstrate you had it?

I suggested referencing the episode SOS in our 44th posts since it was the was the 44th episode. I ended up claiming on post 43 though lol.

I am guessing this has some significance?

Time to make a most likely wolf list
(InB4 I die tonight because it’s very accurate.)

Math
Hook
Dunn
Puppets
Rad
CatScratchFever
Frog

It's Rose and Bernard's first spotlight episode. Before that they were mainly just background characters.

Keep in mind this isn’t a scum team list, this is judging individually.

In post 4581, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 4578, Cephrir wrote:

In post 4576, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 4574, Cephrir wrote:

In post 4569, MathBlade wrote:

In post 4568, Dwlee99 wrote:Discussion was:
Me: I want to be Rose instead of Bernard
Roden: okay
Roden: let's make a complicated crumb <plan here>
Me: wow cool crumb let's do it
Me: wow game move fast
Roden: true but you're townie you're fine
Me: oh you had to claim should I claim now
Roden: some kind of response
Me: okay I'll claim cause everyone says I have to even though I don't want to

Is it antitown to share that plan? To demonstrate you had it?

im curious as to why this is important to you, i can't see how it matters but perhaps you have a reason

mathblade is hard at work "sorting" the claimed mason pair because he has to pretend he's doing something

right that is why i asked

bro you literally asking a bank robber why they're looting a vault

maybe the bank robber is just misunderstood! (or maybe i can tear apart their flimsy explanation and use it against them in court)

In post 4577, Cephrir wrote:oh are we still pretending they could both be scum

i dont think anyone thinks that

I think Math does.

Had to go look up who Math replaced, uhhhh I town read Corwin oops

Did I do that thing again where I town read a bunch of scum because of early vibes

In post 4582, MathBlade wrote:

In post 4577, Cephrir wrote:oh are we still pretending they could both be scum

i dont think anyone thinks that

It seems that’s still the case so I am trying to demonstrate that Roden+Dwlee is unlikely

Is it the case?
Who thinks that?

I am more trying to get people to start talking with each other from a common understanding and from said understanding work outward to a read.

We have too many people trying to slam their specific read.

It’s way too much infighting

You’re doing it with me despite saying you’d give me a day and are doing nothing useful
Bell and Dunn are doing it to an extent

Let’s start from a common framework of what we know and talk with each other.

We know it’s likely Roden and Dunn are masons.
We know Cephrir was wagoned early.

We can use the facts of today to paint a picture versus “gimme gimme”

If the only person is Dunn and maybe Hook.

Don’t even bother.

In post 4571, Roden wrote:

In post 4560, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 4548, Bell wrote:The issue isn’t that he pushed to claim in retrospect, it was that they were scum reading them post claim without thinking through the downsides of claiming Mason D1 as scum.

I too am in the I dunno if dunnstral scum is this silly about a d1 claim.

You need to work on your comprehension here. I didn't say that Roden was scum, I said that he was lying about his claim and gave reasoning. I also gave reasoning for why I thought he was lying about his claim. I

also

gave reasoning for why it was beneficial for him to finish the claim even if he was telling the truth. And it was beneficial; Roden admits they never made that crumb.

???

Are you saying that you thought I was town lying about being Masons? Why push me to claim further then?

No that's not exactly what I'm saying. I didn't push for you to claim because of a scumread, I pushed for you to claim because:

1) I believe the mechanics of the setup would punish us for staggering the claims
2) I believed it was possible that you were lying based on comparing how you treated other people. I still don't understand why you were not town reading your mason partner in your 1 post where you mention them. Do you not understand how that can cause problems further into the game?
3) I believe that once you had claimed mason, you had to have your partner claim either the same day or the day after. In both cases, mafia can kill both masons.

I'll end this by saying that I don't think masons are nearly as important as they are being made out to be, nor do I think that making the person claim here is what is going to cause a mason to die. We probably have stronger roles in this game, and just knowing that you two are claiming mason narrows things down.

Maybe I'll just read Math's ISO

Nevermind he already has over 200 posts...

Hey Roden do you got a read on me yet?

In post 4590, ProfessorDrapion wrote:

In post 4582, MathBlade wrote:

In post 4577, Cephrir wrote:oh are we still pretending they could both be scum

i dont think anyone thinks that

It seems that’s still the case so I am trying to demonstrate that Roden+Dwlee is unlikely

Is it the case?
Who thinks that?

The players who haven’t unvoted Roden yet. There’s a big discussion between Bell and Dunn that seemed like that.

In post 4594, Roden wrote:Maybe I'll just read Math's ISO

Nevermind he already has over 200 posts...

it's a quick skim, wouldn't take more than 10 minutes imo

Why should I townread pooky or frog

In post 4593, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 4571, Roden wrote:

In post 4560, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 4548, Bell wrote:The issue isn’t that he pushed to claim in retrospect, it was that they were scum reading them post claim without thinking through the downsides of claiming Mason D1 as scum.

I too am in the I dunno if dunnstral scum is this silly about a d1 claim.

You need to work on your comprehension here. I didn't say that Roden was scum, I said that he was lying about his claim and gave reasoning. I also gave reasoning for why I thought he was lying about his claim. I

also

gave reasoning for why it was beneficial for him to finish the claim even if he was telling the truth. And it was beneficial; Roden admits they never made that crumb.

???

Are you saying that you thought I was town lying about being Masons? Why push me to claim further then?

3) I believe that once you had claimed mason, you had to have your partner claim either the same day or the day after. In both cases, mafia can kill both masons.
.

So one of the reasons you pushed him was because of salt?