Page 187 of 257

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 10:57 am
by PeregrineV
In post 4643, Titus wrote:
In post 4636, beeboy wrote:
In post 4633, Titus wrote:
In post 4628, beeboy wrote:
In post 4626, beeboy wrote:Titus was in the game where I was in a scum only neighborhood.
modded by GIF
Oh way was that ny 192?
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=56&t=59516
Tbh neither me nor PV got into that game
Plus I think Nopoint was suspected when we replaced in. That didnt help.

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 11:02 am
by Zachstralkita
I'll contrast this sadness by revealing to you all that Dunnstral's been catfishing this whole time and she's actually a moderately attractive scene girl.

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 11:03 am
by Dunnstral
^untrue

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 11:05 am
by Zachstralkita
In post 4652, Dunnstral wrote:^untrue

Come on, you gotta have higher self-esteem than that.

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 11:09 am
by Dunnstral
Armour or Armor?

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 11:11 am
by Zachstralkita
Obviously armor

What are you insinuating here friend

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 11:19 am
by Zachstralkita
Btw Dunn if you can't see that Wake is blatant town I can't help you


And my soul is going to be mildly furious if you all go for Titus/Dunn lynches tomo

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:40 pm
by Wake1
In post 4656, Zachstralkita wrote: And my soul is going to be mildly furious if you all go for Titus/Dunn lynches tomo
If you're Town you need to stop being so naive.

And if we learn it's MB everything changes.

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:41 pm
by shannon
Awww, I missed the excitement!

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:48 pm
by Titus
In post 4657, Wake1 wrote:
In post 4656, Zachstralkita wrote: And my soul is going to be mildly furious if you all go for Titus/Dunn lynches tomo
If you're Town you need to stop being so naive.

And if we learn it's MB everything changes.
You need to stop straw manning, or claim scum.

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:55 pm
by Transcend
I think i might have fucked up lol.

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:59 pm
by Titus
In post 4660, Transcend wrote:I think i might have fucked up lol.
Better say how now.

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:00 pm
by Transcend
Or maybe there's 2 docs but I've been having thoughts at work all day that Mirhawk has coasted on his and vars' claim.

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:11 pm
by Titus
Mirhawk has coasted.

What we need to do is set aside old biases and look at what is possible.

No one seems to have an odd/even night role. That suggests Mirhawk is lying.

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:12 pm
by Transcend
Oh well.

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:17 pm
by podoboq
Image

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:18 pm
by podoboq
In post 4611, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 4506, podoboq wrote:
In post 4421, kraska77 wrote:Silence, fool
Can you like
pipe down and chair the symposium?
Podo has been crumbling pr for a while now btw
I mean.....no? Sure? Maybe?

I've been claiming
S
O
M
E
T
H
I
N
G
, which gives me reason to not only believe, but expect that there are many town PRs, and that something is based on information unique to my slot.

If we end up wagoning anyone who's claimed a protective role (like Almost50), I plan to explain that.
lol
Good job, kids.

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:21 pm
by podoboq
Not claiming today since what's the point?

I'll claim it tomorrow if it becomes important, or scum can just NK me, and you can figure it out pretty easily after I flip. Either way is fine by me.


Oh, also, Peregrine probably town. Mirhawk is also still probably town.

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:42 pm
by podoboq
In post 4506, podoboq wrote:I've been claiming
S
O
M
E
T
H
I
N
G
, which gives me reason to not only believe, but expect that there are many town PRs, and that something is based on information unique to my slot.

If we end up wagoning anyone who's claimed a protective role (like Almost50), I plan to explain that.
I just realized I misspoke here. Should say
"...which gives me reason to not only believe, but expect that there are many town
protective roles
..."

I apologize for the mistake and apologize if it caused any confusion.

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:45 pm
by Dunnstral
Why do you believe there are town protective roles, as opposed to scum protective roles?

Does your role hint at the difference?

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:48 pm
by podoboq
In post 4611, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 4514, podoboq wrote:Role madness isn't plausible, so I don't know where Dunn's comment came from.
Really? Look at all the random claims

Including yours
The following quotes from the wiki:

"Role Madness refers to a type of game where most or all of the players have power roles; that is, there are few to no true Vanilla Townies."

"The game must contain at least one Vanilla Townie (allowed names include: Townie, Vanilla Townie, Townsperson, Citizen). A sample Role PM for the Vanilla Townie must be included in the rules post."


In my opinion, true role madness requires there be no vanilla town at all, which inherently can't be normal.
It's likely that we have at least two VTs, which I definitely wouldn't consider role madness.

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:49 pm
by Dunnstral
That's pretty much role madness man

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:49 pm
by podoboq
In post 4669, Dunnstral wrote:Why do you believe there are town protective roles, as opposed to scum protective roles?

Does your role hint at the difference?
Town specific. There might also be scum protective roles, but I believe there is definitely an above average number of town protective roles.

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:50 pm
by podoboq
In post 4671, Dunnstral wrote:That's pretty much role madness man
Alright, then it's just a semantic thing and we can drop it.

Regardless, it is required that there be at least one VT. That's all we really know.

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:59 pm
by kraska77
In post 4663, Titus wrote:No one seems to have an odd/even night role. That suggests Mirhawk is lying.
I'm ignorant about this stuff
Do they have to come together?