Mafiascum.net

In post 4648, jjh927 wrote:Here it is

In post 4408, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 4390, jjh927 wrote:Okay but that pretty obviously refers to me being able to catch Yume and isn't some cryptic clue

there you go .. you said it yourself.

i already had a confirmation bias knowing it had to be a player....

therefore LIKE I SAID PREVIOSULY i correalted that info with the that post and disregarded the persona of yume but the persona of another person

do u not understand.

There's no point in me engaging in circular arguments on this

Your explanation on your thought process is still an unnatural leap of logic
If we have this argument it's just going to be me telling you that you did not reach the conclusion naturally, and that if the conclusion was not reached naturally but was the 'correct' conclusion you must have been working backwards, while you tell me that you did reach it naturally. Since most players in the game don't care about this argument I wanted to focus elsewhere, particularly since at the time I wanted to elim Victorine before eliming you and abandon the line of reasoning if she were to flip scum. Now, I would go in the reverse order.

In post 4649, jjh927 wrote:

In post 4646, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 4643, jjh927 wrote:Like, your "debunk" of how unnatural it was to assume that Yume was hinting that her flavour was a player that knew both me and Firebringer, for example

U LITERALY SAID "MASTINA" BEFORE I SAID HER NAME AND GUESSED IT

LOOK AT POST 3468

LOOK AT THE FULL INTERAACTION ON PAGE 139 - 140! if u want to anlyaze mroe

And you are proving my point for me.

When I said Mastina, I said it was likely the answer you were leading us to, and the reason you wanted me or Firebringer to say it before you was so you seemed less informed about it

In post 4647, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 4641, jjh927 wrote:I don't think GMo would have information about Vic's role unless both are scum. I also think it's not just the information level but the fact that GMo was actively helping Yume to get her story straight in thread and made a lot of unnatural leaps in order to do it

OMG JUST BECAUSE I WAS ROLEPLAYING DOESN'T MEAN I WAS ACTIVELY HELPING YUME TO GET HER STORY STRAIGHT.


WHY DO THIS IN PUBLIC THREAD, IF I AS SCUM HAVE ACCESS TO SCUM PT!

i really didnt want to say this

but you're are just too dumb to have the same investigating skills as me to come to that conclusion

In post 4651, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 4648, jjh927 wrote:Here it is

In post 4408, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 4390, jjh927 wrote:Okay but that pretty obviously refers to me being able to catch Yume and isn't some cryptic clue

there you go .. you said it yourself.

i already had a confirmation bias knowing it had to be a player....

therefore LIKE I SAID PREVIOSULY i correalted that info with the that post and disregarded the persona of yume but the persona of another person

do u not understand.

There's no point in me engaging in circular arguments on this

Your explanation on your thought process is still an unnatural leap of logic
If we have this argument it's just going to be me telling you that you did not reach the conclusion naturally, and that if the conclusion was not reached naturally but was the 'correct' conclusion you must have been working backwards, while you tell me that you did reach it naturally. Since most players in the game don't care about this argument I wanted to focus elsewhere, particularly since at the time I wanted to elim Victorine before eliming you and abandon the line of reasoning if she were to flip scum. Now, I would go in the reverse order.

the only reason im aruging with you is because ur logic doesn tmake sense and its frustrating

u keep repeating the non based shit that you have no proof.

u arent proving this to me the only thing u are saying is just oh im jumping into conclusions.

post page numbers + post numbers+ discuss the specific interactions with me and vic discuss otehr interactions

u havent done any of that shit but just goes on assumptions.

its okay to make an assumpion once in a time but to make an assumption just to read someone especially two ppl is just bad play.

especailly CONSIDERING I WANTED TO KILL VIC!

In post 4654, jjh927 wrote:

In post 4647, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 4641, jjh927 wrote:I don't think GMo would have information about Vic's role unless both are scum. I also think it's not just the information level but the fact that GMo was actively helping Yume to get her story straight in thread and made a lot of unnatural leaps in order to do it

OMG JUST BECAUSE I WAS ROLEPLAYING DOESN'T MEAN I WAS ACTIVELY HELPING YUME TO GET HER STORY STRAIGHT.


WHY DO THIS IN PUBLIC THREAD, IF I AS SCUM HAVE ACCESS TO SCUM PT!

i really didnt want to say this

but you're are just too dumb to have the same investigating skills as me to come to that conclusion

Because Yume needed help in main thread in order to establish herself and get her story straight

In post 4656, jjh927 wrote:

In post 4651, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 4648, jjh927 wrote:Here it is

In post 4408, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 4390, jjh927 wrote:Okay but that pretty obviously refers to me being able to catch Yume and isn't some cryptic clue

there you go .. you said it yourself.

i already had a confirmation bias knowing it had to be a player....

therefore LIKE I SAID PREVIOSULY i correalted that info with the that post and disregarded the persona of yume but the persona of another person

do u not understand.

There's no point in me engaging in circular arguments on this

Your explanation on your thought process is still an unnatural leap of logic
If we have this argument it's just going to be me telling you that you did not reach the conclusion naturally, and that if the conclusion was not reached naturally but was the 'correct' conclusion you must have been working backwards, while you tell me that you did reach it naturally. Since most players in the game don't care about this argument I wanted to focus elsewhere, particularly since at the time I wanted to elim Victorine before eliming you and abandon the line of reasoning if she were to flip scum. Now, I would go in the reverse order.

the only reason im aruging with you is because ur logic doesn tmake sense and its frustrating

u keep repeating the non based shit that you have no proof.

u arent proving this to me the only thing u are saying is just oh im jumping into conclusions.

post page numbers + post numbers+ discuss the specific interactions with me and vic discuss otehr interactions

u havent done any of that shit but just goes on assumptions.

its okay to make an assumpion once in a time but to make an assumption just to read someone especially two ppl is just bad play.

especailly CONSIDERING I WANTED TO KILL VIC!

You pivoted to wanting to kill Vic literally seconds after I stated you were aligned

In post 4653, Taly wrote:uh

jjh

why did you vote

gypyx

if you still believed

vic/gmo

were aligned

and um

gmo

maybe drop the insults a tad? it reads as AtE

In post 4653, Taly wrote:gmo maybe drop the insults a tad? it reads as AtE

In post 4659, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 4656, jjh927 wrote: You pivoted to wanting to kill Vic literally seconds after I stated you were aligned

that is completely false look at post 3483.

literally 1 minute after u posted that post on 3481.

it was in my pedit

In post 4660, jjh927 wrote:

In post 4653, Taly wrote:uh

jjh

why did you vote

gypyx

if you still believed

vic/gmo

were aligned

and um

gmo

maybe drop the insults a tad? it reads as AtE

We still had time. I wanted to place some more people before the end of the day phase. Also, I was of the opinion that Victorine should be elimed before GMo on this one, and didn't want to immediately elim Vic on the offchance that they actually play on day 2 when there are other viable elims

In post 4662, jjh927 wrote:

In post 4659, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 4656, jjh927 wrote: You pivoted to wanting to kill Vic literally seconds after I stated you were aligned

that is completely false look at post 3483.

literally 1 minute after u posted that post on 3481.

it was in my pedit

Isn't that exactly what I just said? I stated it was scum theatre and you IMMEDIATELY aborted the mission and decided to bus for damage control

In post 4664, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 4662, jjh927 wrote:

In post 4659, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 4656, jjh927 wrote: You pivoted to wanting to kill Vic literally seconds after I stated you were aligned

that is completely false look at post 3483.

literally 1 minute after u posted that post on 3481.

it was in my pedit

Isn't that exactly what I just said? I stated it was scum theatre and you IMMEDIATELY aborted the mission and decided to bus for damage control

i was proving to u that i wasnt pivoting because u said so and i got scared.

i already explained why i didnt like vic and had my vote longer than u ever had urs

In post 4663, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 4660, jjh927 wrote:

In post 4653, Taly wrote:uh

jjh

why did you vote

gypyx

if you still believed

vic/gmo

were aligned

and um

gmo

maybe drop the insults a tad? it reads as AtE

We still had time. I wanted to place some more people before the end of the day phase. Also, I was of the opinion that Victorine should be elimed before GMo on this one, and didn't want to immediately elim Vic on the offchance that they actually play on day 2 when there are other viable elims

omg ik i said i was gonna take a break

but this literally contradicts ur own point

u said u wanted to lim vic before me but then say u want to save vic onto day 2 what??

then why even bringthat point of me being s/s with vic in the first place just nto to question till day 2?

In post 4665, GrandpaMo wrote:u know whats crazy...

@taly

i called jjh town for this btw