Mafiascum.net

ie. How about instead of just shaming us for being wrong/going "You're gonna regret it!" you like, actually propose and push alternative avenues

In post 2282, borkjerfkin wrote:pook

Hm. Does Bork put his buddy in here or not knowing unwnd flips red

Fucking

I was using find on page to skim for Pooky interactions

???? It literally will never get used given that it flips red, he can put anyone there. This is like reading tea leaves.

Maybe I'm just tired and irritable but Jesus Christ the last few pages are irritating

And it's literally a person quote of the wagon itself, not even a bork list

petapan quote, thanks phone

Well yes, I am trying to read the tea leaves of borks interaction with my pool of suspects to narrow it so I don’t have to sit through another 72 hour night lol

I'm saying that bork quoting an entire wagon and saying he'll look there probably does not mean much about one specific person in that group, especially when the "if" clause never gets activated to begin with.

In post 4008, borkjerfkin wrote:T
ben
noddy, ffery, vax
prism, skitter (in progress), dgb (If scum flips something nasty PRwise I'd be more inclined to town this, or if ben were to somehow flip scum in which case duh)
pooky
S

still kinda where i'm at

I feel like that’s a very interesting modifier on the dgb read given the flips on the table

He has an interesting trajectory re dgb

Null/idk how to read her
Dgb weigh in on Pooky
Dgb scum!!!
Cabd said dgb pr
Dgb PR needs more flips to back it up

In post 4700, Prism wrote:ie. How about instead of just shaming us for being wrong/going "You're gonna regret it!" you like, actually propose and push alternative avenues

Everytime I suggest someone there's a always a reason why I'm wrong.

In post 2650, unwnd wrote:If you don't think I'm scum Bork then do you agree with DGB's post in the sense you think the scum also

Doesn't know what the fuck they're doing? Which is why you think this is more in line with what Peta said about town just ripping into each other?

This post becomes even more hilarious if dgb is scum

In post 4712, notscience wrote:

In post 2650, unwnd wrote:If you don't think I'm scum Bork then do you agree with DGB's post in the sense you think the scum also

Doesn't know what the fuck they're doing? Which is why you think this is more in line with what Peta said about town just ripping into each other?

This post becomes even more hilarious if dgb is scum

It would be LOL

look DGB.

Let's say I believe you are an actual Town Odd Night Rolecop

and let's say I believe your results are useful and take NotSci/Vaxkiller off the board.

Where does that leave me?

I know I'm town

I'm pretty sure Prism is town because:
1) interactions with bork
2) utter lack of interest in the game at times that make sense with apathetic I don't even care anymore town.

I can write like more reasons but I just don't see Prism being scum.

So what's that leave? Fiery would literally be the only option. So if you really believe in you being a useful TPR then it pretty much has to be Fiery, then you would have to make a case for Fiery being the last scum.

UNVOTE:

I'm tired as fuck but I will at least look into ffery tomorrow instead of skimming through the 600s and calling it a day. I don't see a real need to review Pooky. I might review Vax for the all goon theory but I figure that's just going to be coinflip city either way.

In post 4714, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:look DGB.

Let's say I believe you are an actual Town Odd Night Rolecop

and let's say I believe your results are useful and take NotSci/Vaxkiller off the board.

Where does that leave me?

I know I'm town

I'm pretty sure Prism is town because:
1) interactions with bork
2) utter lack of interest in the game at times that make sense with apathetic I don't even care anymore town.

I can write like more reasons but I just don't see Prism being scum.

So what's that leave? Fiery would literally be the only option. So if you really believe in you being a useful TPR then it pretty much has to be Fiery, then you would have to make a case for Fiery being the last scum.

I <3 fferyllt, why must this game be so haaaaaaard

In post 3060, fferyllt wrote:Riviting

In post 3089, fferyllt wrote:

In post 3075, Cabd wrote:36 hour prod timers are truly cursed.

Wanna talk?

skitter30 wrote:Like i dont even get why we're wagoning him

The game stagnating while wagoning him feels like scum are 100% fine with this

Who fits this?

In post 3101, fferyllt wrote:

In post 3091, Cabd wrote:Yeah Ffery think you can stay awake this evening. Like ten my time or so?

I slept most of the day, so probably! dnd tonight, wrapping up around 10:30 or so your time.

In post 3351, fferyllt wrote:I'm back.

In post 3359, fferyllt wrote:

In post 3354, Cabd wrote:

In post 3351, fferyllt wrote:I'm back.

Lol you're fucked. Have fun catching up.

What happened to the hydra pt?

In post 3379, fferyllt wrote:

In post 3259, Cabd wrote:I don't actually hate the DGB wagon, hmm.

I expected to, but I don't.

In post 3264, Cabd wrote:After I settle my other reads? I may well subscribe to your product and or service.

Although I kinda want to skip the hullabaloo and run-up and just ask DGB if their softing was actually something or I'm reading empty tea leaves and oh hey, I just did.

These two posts so close together don't make sense to me.

In post 3381, fferyllt wrote:

In post 3373, Cabd wrote:Elements was blocked night one though.

I guess the elements partner shot peta in the face in a scum elements world. But it can't be elements and vax. Its unlikely to be elements and Ben. I don't think notsci or Ffery are scum in any world.

Can you explain this?

In post 3385, fferyllt wrote:

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Blood sacrifice?

Explain that too.

In post 3386, fferyllt wrote:

In post 3383, Cabd wrote:Explain what. Why I know elements was blocked?

I went looking for crumbs and didn't see whatever you saw.

In post 3392, fferyllt wrote:

In post 3387, Cabd wrote:

In post 3386, fferyllt wrote:

In post 3383, Cabd wrote:Explain what. Why I know elements was blocked?

I went looking for crumbs and didn't see whatever you saw.

Do you ACTUALLY want me to do that?

You're stating it like a fact in evidence.

If you think it's better not explained then no.

In post 3394, fferyllt wrote:

In post 3390, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 3385, fferyllt wrote:

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Blood sacrifice?

Explain that too.

R u saying cabd sacrificed syr?

No.

In post 3397, fferyllt wrote:

In post 3393, Cabd wrote:I explicitly don't want to explain why. And it'll be super obvious why later.

But I will if my townreads feel it would help them somehow to know. It absolutely is a fact in evidence.

I don't need to know.

Waiting is.

In post 3400, fferyllt wrote:my eyes are watering. I'll get over it.

In post 3405, fferyllt wrote:They're a cloud of probabilities.

In post 3407, fferyllt wrote:No answer?

In post 3415, fferyllt wrote:

Hang in there.

In post 3420, fferyllt wrote:Elements what does your reads list look like now?

In post 3431, fferyllt wrote:dat reactivity

In post 3433, fferyllt wrote:

In post 3432, Cabd wrote:You claiming catalyst to this chemical reaction or wat

Nope!

If anyone, the catalyst has been vax.

In post 3446, fferyllt wrote:

In post 3444, Cabd wrote:Ffery, unless you're taking your afternoon nap, now's the time to realtime interact with me, but you won't get the deep analysis.

Too few spoons :/

awake-ish now.

probs going to vote Elements.

at least some of your pookie thoughts hit the game yesterday. pookie and elements were my question marks from your 2999(?) post.

stuff can marinate until you have more spoons.

In post 3448, fferyllt wrote:Solid enough for now!

I'm always skittish about vca. my main source of hives atm.

In post 3463, fferyllt wrote:my devices are all rebelling at once. it's awe inspiring.

my skitter read is flickering some.

Talk about bork?

In post 3527, fferyllt wrote:

In post 3502, Cabd wrote:I hate it when my townreads don't love each other :~(

Can we murder elements yet?

Your self-trust levels have gone way up.

In post 3561, fferyllt wrote:this game

In post 3585, fferyllt wrote:I hate how I feel about this game.

I'm waiting to see what Elements posts next.

and a vc. waiting for that too.

In post 3623, fferyllt wrote:I don't discount that possibility.

In post 3633, fferyllt wrote:

In post 3627, DrippingGoofball wrote:UNVOTE:

Just to avoid a surprise hammer, we still have some discussion left re:Elements

Who do you think would do this?

I could post enough quotes like like to make you all scroll for eternity but is it normal that fferyllt never actually says anything?

Asking short dead end, no follow up questions with the regularity of a cricket stuck in my garage? Interspersed with RL trivia that has nothing to do with the game?

Pooky, how am I doing?

dgb, gth who's your pick for last scum?

It's gonna have to be you?

In post 25, fferyllt wrote:Greetings, Gentlebeings!

I love the word "gentlebeings" so so much...

Just confess and we can hug.