Mafiascum.net

Sigh...

I ask again: 0verki11, Chemist1422, Clemency. What do they all have in common?

Lynchbait?

In post 4718, RadiantCowbells wrote:i think that chemist is town
and that clemency is probably not the only scum in the coalition

In post 4719, RadiantCowbells wrote:that's me thinking that OK is town as well btw

Who else then? I really think PB is town. I think if we exclude Creature/Sky from the 2nd coalition, we’re good.

I did dislike Creature’s veto and not including any coalition members but I think only one scum is likely, since I don’t think my reads are that bad. Sky only if there’s a deep wolf, since I obvtown read Taly.

Could be, I’m starting to doubt my OK sr. His D1 BEF push was so scummy but yeah, could definitely be wrong on him.

I think you should remove PB from your veto in any case, especially if you’re convinced on Moon/Mbaki scum

In post 4724, RadiantCowbells wrote:yes i can.

Silly.

In post 4580, Moongrass wrote:I don't believe the aggression NF is pushing. The tone doesn't line up with someone trying to sort the game but rather someone attempting to bend the game to their will through sheer force.

When I eventually flip please remember this one thing and stop letting NF do this.

In post 4722, RadiantCowbells wrote:regardless, UNVOTE:

i'll play once tmck is gone and if i die first tmck can enjoy playing the game without having to deal with spooky unreadable radiantcowbells

That won’t happen unless he replaces out.

In post 4729, Moongrass wrote:

In post 4580, Moongrass wrote:I don't believe the aggression NF is pushing. The tone doesn't line up with someone trying to sort the game but rather someone attempting to bend the game to their will through sheer force.

When I eventually flip please remember this one thing and stop letting NF do this.

You haven’t done a goddamned thing to get me to change my read on you. You’re only argument is you dislike my pushing you. Well guess freaking what? That’s because you’re my #1 sr. It was previously OK but he is currently acting way townier than you.

In post 4729, Moongrass wrote:

In post 4580, Moongrass wrote:I don't believe the aggression NF is pushing. The tone doesn't line up with someone trying to sort the game but rather someone attempting to bend the game to their will through sheer force.

When I eventually flip please remember this one thing and stop letting NF do this.

You want me to change my read on you? Do something to fucking earn it. This kind of broken record bs. is just reinforcing it.

In post 4725, Pink Ball wrote:Sigh...

I ask again: 0verki11, Chemist1422, Clemency. What do they all have in common?

Who do you think is scum in the coalition and what did you think about Ank’s reads?

In post 4731, NanceFloor wrote:

In post 4729, Moongrass wrote:

In post 4580, Moongrass wrote:I don't believe the aggression NF is pushing. The tone doesn't line up with someone trying to sort the game but rather someone attempting to bend the game to their will through sheer force.

When I eventually flip please remember this one thing and stop letting NF do this.

You haven’t done a goddamned thing to get me to change my read on you. You’re only argument is you dislike my pushing you. Well guess freaking what? That’s because you’re my #1 sr. It was previously OK but he is currently acting way townier than you.

You have no reason except I didn't agree with you or bend to your will by following your barked orders.

In post 4726, Moongrass wrote:Lynchbait?

Yes. And right now, those three players are in the most voted veto convo right now.

Who's pushing for that, town or scum?

In post 4732, NanceFloor wrote:

In post 4729, Moongrass wrote:

In post 4580, Moongrass wrote:I don't believe the aggression NF is pushing. The tone doesn't line up with someone trying to sort the game but rather someone attempting to bend the game to their will through sheer force.

When I eventually flip please remember this one thing and stop letting NF do this.

You want me to change my read on you? Do something to fucking earn it. This kind of broken record bs. is just reinforcing it.

Blah blah read my ISO your read is shit.

In post 4733, NanceFloor wrote:

In post 4725, Pink Ball wrote:Sigh...

I ask again: 0verki11, Chemist1422, Clemency. What do they all have in common?

Who do you think is scum in the coalition and what did you think about Ank’s reads?

I don't remember who was in the coalition, and I haven't read anything about Ank.

In post 4734, Moongrass wrote:

In post 4731, NanceFloor wrote:

In post 4729, Moongrass wrote:

In post 4580, Moongrass wrote:I don't believe the aggression NF is pushing. The tone doesn't line up with someone trying to sort the game but rather someone attempting to bend the game to their will through sheer force.

When I eventually flip please remember this one thing and stop letting NF do this.

You haven’t done a goddamned thing to get me to change my read on you. You’re only argument is you dislike my pushing you. Well guess freaking what? That’s because you’re my #1 sr. It was previously OK but he is currently acting way townier than you.

You have no reason except I didn't agree with you or bend to your will by following your barked orders.

If you’re going to continue to be deliberately obtuse and ignore all of my reasoning. - which I’ve stated and restated and you continually refuse to even address, I’m done here.

In post 4735, Pink Ball wrote:

In post 4726, Moongrass wrote:Lynchbait?

Yes. And right now, those three players are in the most voted veto convo right now.

Who's pushing for that, town or scum?

You forget that two were in failed coalition. Do you not think it’s optimal to veto 2 slots from there and if not Chemist/Clemency, who would you prefer?

Who would you switch with Overkill11?

In post 4735, Pink Ball wrote:

In post 4726, Moongrass wrote:Lynchbait?

Yes. And right now, those three players are in the most voted veto convo right now.

Who's pushing for that, town or scum?

Probably scum 0K is finally being established as likely town. Clemency has had unimpressive votes and was in the failed coalition, Chemist is behaving like coasting scum and was also in the failed coalition. If we can put them in a pool to cull them off then it gives scum less LHF to hide behind.

Take a look at the failed coalition and tell me who's scum if not those two.

In post 4737, Pink Ball wrote:

In post 4733, NanceFloor wrote:

In post 4725, Pink Ball wrote:Sigh...

I ask again: 0verki11, Chemist1422, Clemency. What do they all have in common?

Who do you think is scum in the coalition and what did you think about Ank’s reads?

I don't remember who was in the coalition, and I haven't read anything about Ank.

Us, confirmed repicker tmck, RC, your slot, Sky/Taly, Clemency, Chemist. I originally wanted Maria/JE over Chemist but people objected.

Well my read on your slot is obviously heavily influenced by my Ank read as well as any possible associations/lack there of with any other slots. Therefore your view on her reads would be helpful.

In post 4736, Moongrass wrote:

In post 4732, NanceFloor wrote:

In post 4729, Moongrass wrote:

In post 4580, Moongrass wrote:I don't believe the aggression NF is pushing. The tone doesn't line up with someone trying to sort the game but rather someone attempting to bend the game to their will through sheer force.

When I eventually flip please remember this one thing and stop letting NF do this.

You want me to change my read on you? Do something to fucking earn it. This kind of broken record bs. is just reinforcing it.

Blah blah read my ISO your read is shit.

Could say the exact same thing about your Maria read.

In post 4725, Pink Ball wrote:Sigh...

I ask again: 0verki11, Chemist1422, Clemency. What do they all have in common?

They're either LHF or scum, which is the best veto material.

-TL

In post 4740, Moongrass wrote:

In post 4735, Pink Ball wrote:

In post 4726, Moongrass wrote:Lynchbait?

Yes. And right now, those three players are in the most voted veto convo right now.

Who's pushing for that, town or scum?

Probably scum 0K is finally being established as likely town. Clemency has had unimpressive votes and was in the failed coalition, Chemist is behaving like coasting scum and was also in the failed coalition. If we can put them in a pool to cull them off then it gives scum less LHF to hide behind.

Take a look at the failed coalition and tell me who's scum if not those two.

If you think scum is pushing this then why are you agreeing with Clemency/Chemist? Because you know that theory is probably wrong. Having the two least townie coalition slots in veto, is transparently townie and you clearly think that too.

@RC if you think there’s more than one scum in coalition who’s not Chemist than who? Just ISO’d Sky and feel pretty good that my initial Taly tr was probably correct.

In post 4475, Creature wrote:

In post 4474, NanceFloor wrote:I don’t understand why you wouldn’t have anyone in the failed coalition in this list?

If the veto list was Ank's slot, Clem, Chem and me, what do you think would happen?

In post 4478, Creature wrote:

In post 4476, RadiantCowbells wrote:you and {chem/ank} would die

Exactly

This is why Titus wanting to veto 4 coalition slots is bad.

PB I'm getting worried about you.

In post 4746, NanceFloor wrote:

In post 4475, Creature wrote:

In post 4474, NanceFloor wrote:I don’t understand why you wouldn’t have anyone in the failed coalition in this list?

If the veto list was Ank's slot, Clem, Chem and me, what do you think would happen?

In post 4478, Creature wrote:

In post 4476, RadiantCowbells wrote:you and {chem/ank} would die

Exactly

This is why Titus wanting to veto 4 coalition slots is bad.

I happen to think Creature is possible scum, particularly with his reaction to my suggestion. Ank didn't want to play anymore and at least 1 town would die.

Then, we get the strategic benefits later too.

Titus, I am not getting vetoed because I'm not discardable town like this.