Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 9:42 am
Could just be salty scum here.In post 4715, Titus wrote:Game's unbalanced anyway.
Could just be salty scum here.In post 4715, Titus wrote:Game's unbalanced anyway.
In post 4724, Brian Skies wrote:I don't understand why I should care about her 'soft' when she hasn't said what it is.
Also, I don't care about claims that are brought up while under pressure. She could literally just be doing it for self-preservation.
Why are you automatically assuming it's town and not just to buddy you?
/:In post 4725, Brian Skies wrote:Could just be salty scum here.In post 4715, Titus wrote:Game's unbalanced anyway.
Why should I give a shit about your 'soft' when you've only introduced it under pressure?In post 4726, Titus wrote:Why haven't you actually attempted to sort my soft? First you ignore it, but then you shade it as scum.
You once proclaimed Bell was scum, but you treat him here like town with zero transistion from your vote.
You don't care what my soft is. You haven't even acknowledged my Beam it over post because it doesn't fit your narrative.
Let's be real here, Bell.In post 4728, Bell wrote:/:In post 4725, Brian Skies wrote:Could just be salty scum here.In post 4715, Titus wrote:Game's unbalanced anyway.
What a shocking revelation.In post 4729, Titus wrote:He's deflecting from the fact he doesn't care what my soft is. He just wants me dead.
Titus if you are town please really try to take in and respond to the followingIn post 4705, Titus wrote:Far enough. The further this goes on, the less I want to read because it's that obvious Brian is scum. I could be discounting the evidence but I am not.
I legit don't want to read 200-300 posts an hour when scum is obvious, game is unbalanced, and we're going to miseliminate one of the only PRs that can stop it.
In post 3442, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Titus the first time we played after I did what I did to you in Machina mafia, you were paranoid and I just kind of swallowed it and took it. I figured it was natural, gotta get it out of the system.In post 2056, Titus wrote:@LLD, What can I do, aside from dropping my scumread on you, to make the game more enjoyable for you? We all play to have fun and I want you to have fun even if you think I'm a dumbass.
We're 2+ years later now and you're doing the same fucking play pattern, pretending you have a solid way to read me and using some kind of authority you have not earned from our prior experiences to speak on how i play as if you know that at all.
what frustrates me titus, is that you're not actually even scumreading me, you're scumreading the ghost of a player i'm not, and i can't really fucking argue with it or you.
you tell me "lld is like this, lld is liek that so she's scum here" and then i have to come in here and go "that's not true, that's patently false here is the evidence" but by then you've moved on to make more equally wrong but loud statements.
It's a tactic called "Never play defense" and I know you're a lawyer but i wish you'd stop literally playing like one.
you have yourself convinced of a truth, so now you're putting together a case to make it work, not the other way around is waht it feels
and that's hyper frustrating, because it's not even somehting i can make you stop. you go "oh look lld is playing so defensively" but as a townie i'm not going to let misinformation about me circulate and go unchecked because then people believe it's credible and the truth.
doing the same thing with unwnd. post an untruth, get checked.
so maybe, if you wanna know what i want, start taking your own fucking advice and decide who you are gonna kill in your own thread and stop talking out your ass as an expert on a player you have never successfully read even once from my recollection.
and my memory for mafia games is pretty fucking good
I very clearly moved my vote to Titus and have been pushing her and clearly said I think the mechanics discussion was unconvincing.In post 4734, Bell wrote:I really could have appreciated you registering that rather than keeping that shift under your hat Brian.
Wrong. A, I'm not under pressure.In post 4731, Brian Skies wrote:Why should I give a shit about your 'soft' when you've only introduced it under pressure?In post 4726, Titus wrote:Why haven't you actually attempted to sort my soft? First you ignore it, but then you shade it as scum.
You once proclaimed Bell was scum, but you treat him here like town with zero transistion from your vote.
You don't care what my soft is. You haven't even acknowledged my Beam it over post because it doesn't fit your narrative.
I only voted Bell because I thought he was crumbing his role and then changed it to an even night modifier. HP brought up the point that the post we all think he was crumbing Even Night could just as easily be interpreted as him claiming Not Even, and that it was a stupid argument anyway.
You also haven't acknowledged you could be wrong on your read on me despite being told all your reasons are wrong, so why should I care?
In this context is she complaining about balance? Is that the crux of her argument? Is that post attached to a larger context? You’re saying she assumption slipped, but hear me out, wut if based just on what we know so far and what she knows about just her role and mine, and all the claims and stuff over in the other thread plus other stuff plus the comments by isis in cakes thread plus, well, a bunch of other stuff.In post 4733, Brian Skies wrote:Let's be real here, Bell.In post 4728, Bell wrote:/:In post 4725, Brian Skies wrote:Could just be salty scum here.In post 4715, Titus wrote:Game's unbalanced anyway.
Do you think it's more likely for town to be complaining about lack of balance on Day 2 when we don't even know the majority of the setup, or scum that at least knows what they have?
I very do care about your perspective, but your perspective is built on a house of cards and I already knocked it down.In post 4739, Titus wrote:Again, do you even care about my perspective at all to sort me? No.
That’s fine. But can you scootIn post 4740, Annie Edison wrote:I will not be voting for Brian sorry to disappoint
Bolded is why I SR Brian. If he has a choice between losing his buddies to death or by turnstyle, which does he pick? Turnstyle. That's literally the crux of my case.In post 4736, Spiffeh wrote:Titus if you are town please really try to take in and respond to the followingIn post 4705, Titus wrote:Far enough. The further this goes on, the less I want to read because it's that obvious Brian is scum. I could be discounting the evidence but I am not.
I legit don't want to read 200-300 posts an hour when scum is obvious, game is unbalanced, and we're going to miseliminate one of the only PRs that can stop it.
I think Brian's case on you was super town
Idon't agree that Brian/Pooky/pisskop is the scum team on this side because Brian played a big part in turnstiling the other two AND offered his role to help accomplish that. That would just leave him over here with plenty of town players that are familiar enough with him to catch him and it risks clearing this thread before N2 which is scum's worst nightmare
Your early hesitance to townread me is one of the main reasons I town read you and I feel like you wouldn't be so quick to switch gears without explanation even if you are scum reading Brian Skies independently. It reminds me a lot of your treatment of me in Flying Scumsman, where you pocketed me early and proceeded to vocally hard-town read me so I would stay out of your way. So I would really appreciate if you went into more detail as to how your read on me has progressed. Is a lot of it because you are so certain in the Brian/Pooky/pisskop theory, or is it completely independent from that?
Because Titus is fucking scum.In post 4744, Spiffeh wrote:Brian Skies explain to me why your case can't be explained away simply by: "It's Titus"
Then eliminate me.In post 4740, Annie Edison wrote:I will not be voting for Brian sorry to disappoint