Page 20 of 26
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 11:48 am
by quadz08
Ummmmm.... I did last page.
Recap: I'm Martin the Warrior, rolecop, Spirit. Ability name is "discerning the soul." It shows me all unique abilities a player has in their role PM. I targeted Korlash last night; I got that when he dies, it will show that he is a spirit, and that during confirmation, he was able to choose between being nightkill-immune and returning 'redwall-aligned' to any alignment checks.
I'm getting on a plane to Cleveland in about 4 minutes, so I'm going to be more or less mia for about 6 hours. (I do have one layover, but I don't think I"ll have much time.)
I'm rather hoping I come back to a scumflip.
P-EDIT: Thank you, Zdenek, for making sense. Jeebus. If I'm lying then shoot me tonight / lynch me tomorrow. My action is confirmable, AND since Korlash's role implies that there is an alignment investigator, they can target me tonight too if they feel it's necessary. Don't be stupid.
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 11:56 am
by Junpei
unvote
quadz you're saying that you're unlimited shot then?
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:00 pm
by quadz08
Oh god dammit....
fuckety fuck fuck.
I am, in fact, one-shot. I missed that every time I read my damned role PM until right now when you asked about it specifically. I didn't read carefully enough, and that's entirely my fault. fuckfuckfuck.
Welp. So much for my action being confirmable. :/
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:02 pm
by hiplop
die quadz die
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:11 pm
by PeregrineV
↑ PeregrineV wrote:
@Quadz- You need to use your rolecoppiness on a random person, who will verify that you correctly named their abilities. This won't completely clear you as town, but it will help verify the veracity of your ability.
If the same person you cop dies, I will suspect you as scum who killed them so your results could not be verified.
This only applies if Korlash flips scum.
↑ quadz08 wrote:Oh god dammit....
fuckety fuck fuck.
I am, in fact, one-shot. I missed that every time I read my damned role PM until right now when you asked about it specifically. I didn't read carefully enough, and that's entirely my fault. fuckfuckfuck.
Welp. So much for my action being confirmable. :/
dude....
unvote
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:16 pm
by Zdenek
Qudaz's botching his claim is depressing, but I'm still not voting for him.
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:19 pm
by quadz08
(Phone posting from taxi-ing plane.) Lynch me if you must, but Korlash needs to die. If not today, then tonight/tomorrow. He's scum, I guarantee it 100%. If you lynch me, DO NOT FORGET MY GUILTY. Don't do it.
We already fucked things up once by not lynching yesterDay; don't fuck it up again.
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 1:00 pm
by Korlash
Z-Something wrote:Anyone voting for Quadz needs to take a hard stance on Korlash in their next post and needs to say exactly what they think Quadz' scum motivation is for claiming the guilty on Korlash
I outed you and had posted potentially the best attacks/case on Quadz slot, I was at the time a claimed 'X-Shot investigation role', and I'm rather hard to get rid of... Your RBer can hold my power at bay but you can't really kill a claimed investigation role while the possibility of a doctor still existed, and after yesterday my mislynch might not appear super easy to you two. And if left alone to do my thing, you know I'm bringing the heat your way, so all in all, sacing one of you to get rid of me and possible out a cop/vig sounds like a rather good plan given the situation.
I still think you should have told him to wait and make sure I wasn't getting lynched first though. That was a dumb move on his part.
Quad wrote:P-EDIT: Thank you, Zdenek, for making sense. Jeebus. If I'm lying then shoot me tonight / lynch me tomorrow. My action is confirmable, AND since Korlash's role implies that there is an alignment investigator, they can target me tonight too if they feel it's necessary. Don't be stupid.
So a miislynch and a wasted investigation... Naw, can we have any other, hopefully I'm not the only one, investigation roles target someone besides the outed scum please? Z-Something perhaps... Pere if you feel the need... Just don't bloody waste it on Quad.
Quadz wrote:We already fucked things up once by not lynching yesterDay; don't fuck it up again.
You all notice that both Z and Quadz are pulling this stick now? Trying to brow beat the town over our supposed 'failure yesterday' and push the lynch through fear. "Don't fuck it up again guys! remember last time" blah blah blah, that never works mate.
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 1:04 pm
by hiplop
You all notice that both Z and Quadz are pulling this stick now? Trying to brow beat the town over our supposed 'failure yesterday' and push the lynch through fear. "Don't fuck it up again guys! remember last time" blah blah blah, that never works mate.
if thats the case then why do people go to church??? >_>
i think quadz is pretty blatantly scum here, idk why we're stalling
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 1:26 pm
by Zdenek
Hiplop- views on Korlash and scum motivation for Quadz to have fake claimed.
Go.
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 1:31 pm
by Korlash
Hiplop wrote:if thats the case then why do people go to church??? >_>
Wine, crackers, singing, and giving money away. It's got all the makings of a rave party with none of the fun. Who doesn't want that?
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 2:05 pm
by hiplop
i guess im just in the minority here korlash
I'm pretty sure korlash is town, plus hes a pretty cool guy.
is the second part real? have you never seen a scum fakeclaim before? its an amazing strategy
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 2:46 pm
by pappums rat
I am really torn right now over who to vote for. On one hand, it does look like both players for Quadz slot breadcrumbed their role, but Quadz botching the claim and then making poor excuses afterwards does not look good to me, and the flavor justification for the role is wonky. I also think his choice and reasoning for choosing Korlash is bad. As far as Korlash goes, I've had a strong town-read on him all game long and I think his defense against Quadz has been good. The only reasons I can find why I would vote him would be that it would theoretically be good play to lynch the person with a "guilty" (if you can call it that) verdict claimed on him, and that lynching him would pretty much put us in the same situation as if he had been lynched day 1 (except that the scum would get their kill in tonight, so we would be down an extra townie). Either way, we would pretty much have to lynch the other person tomorrow because they would be almost-confirmed scum. As it stands right now, I am going to take a little more time to decide on who I think should be the lynch for today, but I'm leaning towards putting my vote on Quadz.
Also, I'd like to say that I dont like all this vig speculation. I have never liked NK-analysis, it is far too WIFOM-based, and I think assuming there is a vig in the game would be a bad idea.
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 2:54 pm
by Korlash
rat wrote:Either way, we would pretty much have to lynch the other person tomorrow because they would be almost-confirmed scum.
Whoa, red flags... Either way? Are you saying you know for a fact we're both town?
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:22 pm
by quadz08
I'm frustrated with myself for fucking up my claim and misreading my role PM. I'd understand a lynch on me today if it's necessary, but Korlash needs to be the next death.
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:33 pm
by Junpei
vote Korlash
Ah well quadz has convinced me.
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:47 pm
by Korlash
Just promise me you'll go after Z once he's dead, eh Jun?
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:58 pm
by Junpei
Once you're dead?
How about this: If you flip town, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and fully look into Zedenek's actions. I'll analyze his play as much as I analyzed everyones' play in Ninja Mafia at LYLO; and my reads were pretty nice afterward.
In other words, I'll do my best to have no regrets, and to make you satisfied in the dead QT with my work.
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 6:08 pm
by Korlash
Once he (Quadz) is dead.
Why do I need to flip town for you to 'fully look into Z-something's actions'? Come on Jun, I didn't know you looked into people based on situational circumstances... Tsk tsk, disappointing man. =D
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 12:15 am
by iStark
Are you saying you're not town?
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 4:55 am
by DarthYoshi
Day Two, Vote Count the Second
Korlash (4): quadz08, Zdenek, iStark, Junpei
quadz08 (3): Korlash, hiplop, riceballtail
Not Voting (2): pappums rat, PeregrineV
With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch and 5 to no-lynch.
The deadline is currently set for noon PDT (GMT-7) on Thursday, April 19.
As ever, any questions or concerns, please let me know.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:36 am
by Korlash
Starky-boy wrote:Are you saying you're not town?
*shakes head* Nothing of the sort. merely questioning Jun's phrasing.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:37 am
by iStark
Why would you bother to do that if you know you're town?
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:43 am
by Korlash
Because Jun's phrasing suggests he isn't currently looking at Z-Something, nor would in the hypothetical situation in which I did flip town. It means he is limiting his 'suspects' which is something I find strange for him to do.
And why would I bother to questions strange phrasing from another player if I were town? *looks at you* Come on mate, that should be an easy one...
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:44 am
by Korlash
Sorry sorry, didn't bother to preview that one, Should read "in the hypothetical situation in which I flip scum". I was staring at Starky-Boys post while writing and miswrote that.