Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:29 am
↑ SleepyKrew wrote:It looks naked without a 'The' to me.
No takers?
Page 20 of 173
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:29 am
No takers?
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:31 am
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:33 am
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:36 am
There are several titles on this site that were never implemented because there were some really good ones, but people could not stop making new (worse) titles and arguing over the good ones.
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:41 am
So the problem is obviously that we weren't rushing them through fast enough.
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:43 am
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:51 am
↑ animorpherv1 wrote:
All I was doing was saying that more time =/= better title, like you suggested.
How does that make less time = better titles valid?
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:00 am
That's not what I was saying either. A good title will come independent of time. Time never has, and never will, be a factor in good titles.
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:08 am
That's a ridiculous thing to assume Ani.
Time is relevant so far as other suggestions are concerned.
If you prevent other suggestions from being suggested by power confirming a popular title then those suggestions won't be posted and potentially better titles (good titles as you say) will not be heard or critiqued.
I mean this isn't a problem if Button is willing to just wave his
Time is relevant so far as other suggestions are concerned.
If you prevent other suggestions from being suggested by power confirming a popular title then those suggestions won't be posted and potentially better titles (good titles as you say) will not be heard or critiqued.
I mean this isn't a problem if Button is willing to just wave his
dick
wand around and redo titles. But...Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:17 am
This is a greatly superior method to the prior one. Speed titling is perfectly fine. And if you really think of a better one, we now have a title fairy that will change old titles. Perfection is the enemy of good.
ani is mostly right here, and you guys are being ridiculous.
ani is mostly right here, and you guys are being ridiculous.
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:03 pm
*sigh*
Overuse will become a problem.
Overuse will become a problem.
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:27 pm
↑ animorpherv1 wrote:
Pretty certain I was suggesting that less time == bad titles.
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:29 pm
Also wrong. Good titles will come up when they come up, regardless of how much time was spent on an individual title.
↑ SleepyKrew wrote:Goddammit kdowns, you already have a title.
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:33 pm
On a semi-related note, because Flameaxe said to re nominate Om for a spam finder related title in two months if he's still finding spam (and it's been more than that):
EDIT: Althought 'Spam? No Thank you' or something like that may work better.
Nominate Om of the Nom for 'Spam? Not For Me.'
EDIT: Althought 'Spam? No Thank you' or something like that may work better.
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:38 pm
Spam? Had Some, Thanks
might be more appropriate.Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:52 pm
↑ animorpherv1 wrote:Also wrong. Good titles will come up when they come up, regardless of how much time was spent on an individual title.
I don't know how you can actually think this is true given the context of our discussion but you'll grow out of it eventually I'm sure.
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:23 pm
So um lyk I totally think I should be nominated for a title and anyone who says otherwise is a dumbshit.
Just kidding, I'll shut up this time, except to agree or disagree to a title. For example, I prefer Flay's title to ani's.
Just kidding, I'll shut up this time, except to agree or disagree to a title. For example, I prefer Flay's title to ani's.
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:38 pm
↑ xRECKONERx wrote:
Because this was a bad suggestion and also Umbrage hasn't done anything title worthy
There is no such thing as title worthy other than being a member of the site, and somebody suggesting a title for you that is considered to fit well enough by what essentially amounts to a kangaroo court of internet friends and gangsters. get the fuck with the program
nth Dolorous
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:52 pm
Om of the Nom: What about
Maybe not so good.
Eats ham and jam
Maybe not so good.
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:59 pm
Spambot Stopper
would be another idea considering the amount of spam he reports and I think spam commonly comes from bots.Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:04 pm
Mehdi that's not a great title because it's for something he does on the side, not about who he is and who people recognize him as.
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:07 pm
Doesn't reference spam as well as I'd like.
This only has a single meaning, what happened last time is that the titles were also referencing the fact that I tend to spam in my games too.