↑ThunderHog wrote:Post 424 is a big one, IMO. It builds an entire case against BT with only a single sentence
Problem with that Thunderhog is that 424 isn't a case - it only interprets my moves in a particular way so of course it'd "make sense" but only that.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:15 am
by BT
Faraday I don't think the reason is shitty at all.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:15 am
by DeltaWave
fyi on weekdays I tend to post in the evenings and for a small window of time mid-afternoon
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:16 am
by Pretentiousdra
note to any vigs/etc in this game:
GOOD SHOTS:
01. Nobody Special
02. DeltaWave
04. Iecerint
05. zoraster
07. whispersilk
09. dramonic
18. Om of the Nom
20. JacobSavage
22. BT
Iece comes right off the list the second he posts. Bonus points for hitting scumoraster the lurking scumbag who always lurks his balls off as scum, or dramonic who does the same.
Shots outside of this pool will result in heavy objects being thrown at your head.
Delta, don't try to get into an argument with me. Go post content instead. Sound good? Dealio then.
Pedit: If you have time to post bullshit you have time to post real content
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:19 am
by DeltaWave
Frankly your reaction is so priceless that I want to continue provoking you.
You think Om is scum or what? He's on your list.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:21 am
by Pretentiousdra
That's a list of fuckaduck lurkers and Om of the nom, because despite not lurking he doesn't provide CONTENT.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:22 am
by Sir Elton Hercules John
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:22 am
by kuribo
↑ThunderHog wrote:In my opinion, Kuribo and Vollkan over reacted to his actions - and thus 3 pages of this thread were spent trying to build a case against someone for something small. I've noted this by the way, and because of this I have scum leans on both Kuribo and Vollkan.
I wasn't "trying to build a case," I presented to him a line of questioning regarding questionable behavior, and I felt he was talking me in circles. If I wasn't (presently) satisfied with the responses I (eventually) got, I'd be voting him.
And honestly, you wouldn't know scum-me even if you were a mason and I counter-claimed you with my scum buddy.
Just look at the post. I could take anyone's voteswitch + other suspect and make the same post about them.
Do it, go.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:25 am
by zoraster
oh good. the game hasn't even been open 24 hours yet has 18 pages worth of catchup to do, which will take a while, and I'm being set up for a shot because I'm "lurking."
I have read very little of this game (page 1 and pages 18-20), but vig directing after not even a full day smacks of trying way too hard.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:26 am
by DeltaWave
↑Pretentiousdra wrote:That's a list of fuckaduck lurkers and Om of the nom, because despite not lurking he doesn't provide CONTENT.
What's the purpose of posting this list at this point in time? The game literally started yesterday and you're already calling vig targets? It's a large theme, we're probably going to ride this day out until near deadline. So I don't see any reason to start throwing this kind of thing around so goddamn early unless you're looking to score townpoints or to seem like you're pro-town by riding on people who haven't posted that much. It just doesn't make sense.
↑kuribo wrote:And honestly, you wouldn't know scum-me even if you were a mason and I counter-claimed you with my scum buddy.
isn't that sorta what scum you does?
scum me kills off strong players, flips wagons around onto the people that suspect him, pushes wagons to collect L-1 claims, then claims early so I can later change the claim several times and eventually devolve the town into such jibbering madness that they keep me alive despite having a near-universal scum read on me because they're too busy arguing with one another
not that I don't scream at people as town, but a well-trained eye can tell when I'm doing it out of legitimate annoyance or when I'm doing it to distract the town
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:30 am
by Pretentiousdra
↑zoraster wrote:oh good. the game hasn't even been open 24 hours yet has 18 pages worth of catchup to do, which will take a while, and I'm being set up for a shot because I'm "lurking."
I have read very little of this game (page 1 and pages 18-20), but vig directing after not even a full day smacks of trying way too hard.
↑Pretentiousdra wrote:That's a list of fuckaduck lurkers and Om of the nom, because despite not lurking he doesn't provide CONTENT.
What's the purpose of posting this list at this point in time? The game literally started yesterday and you're already calling vig targets? It's a large theme, we're probably going to ride this day out until near deadline. So I don't see any reason to start throwing this kind of thing around so goddamn early unless you're looking to score townpoints or to seem like you're pro-town by riding on people who haven't posted that much. It just doesn't make sense.
Boy that sure got you into the thread fast, Zor. I'll happily take you off the vig list and move you over to the lynch list, once you provide some scummy content
oh and DW here's my long and elaborate reply to you:
lol
Pedit: was making a joke about your mason claim in the last gay mafia son.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:31 am
by DeltaWave
↑Pretentiousdra wrote:
oh and DW here's my long and elaborate reply to you:
You can see what I mean without an example. So no.
↑Ythan wrote:
It reads as confirmation biased cake icing but it's still what it is.
Well it's still wrong. And a
case
would explain why that behavior is the correct behavior. Which is the point.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:32 am
by Zoidberg
Catching up. Chronologically:
I wasn't prepared to vote BT based on 2 posts but his 3rd post in the game was basically just defending himself instead of scumhunting, and piggybacking on other peoples' cases. VOTE: BT
As much as it pains me to say I think Pretentious is town. I wish they (and others) would post less, though
Ythan is a straight-up douche but I'm leaning town on him
Kuribo probably town too.
Null on Drench and Vollkan
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:34 am
by Pretentiousdra
Make a case on someone based on someone based on their actions? Go?
Your post where you voted Quilford I saw nothing he posted quoted, period. Make a case based on just someone else's actions, rather than quoting someone else's take on it, and then complaining about the same tactic when it's done to justify a scumread on you.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:34 am
by Ythan
We disagree about the meaning of the word case but there's nothing else here for us to discuss imo.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:35 am
by Ythan
↑Zoidberg wrote:Ythan is a straight-up douche but I'm leaning town on him
